• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Legal and General News
  • Legal News
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Go back to list
Decision over 10–day notice stands 13 May 2015 12:00 am

©The Star (Used by permission)
by QISHIN TARIQ


PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal’s landmark decision – that it is unconstitutional to make it an offence not to give the police 10 days’ notice of a gathering under the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 – stands.

Yesterday, the Federal Court struck out the Attorney–General’s Chambers (AGC) appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision last year that the charge levelled against PKR lawmaker Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad under the Act was unconstitutional.

The panel did this after deputy public prosecutor Manoj Kurup, head of Appellate and Trial Division at AGC, applied to withdraw the appeal.

The Federal Court coram comprised Court of Appeal president Justice Md Raus Sharif, Chief Judge of Malaya Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin, Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Richard Malanjum and Justices Abu Samah Nordin and Zaharah Ibrahim.

Citing case law, DPP Manoj told the panel a matter could only be brought up twice from the originating trial court.

As Nik Nazmi’s case started in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court, the Court of Appeal would be the apex court in this case.

On May 17, 2013, Nik Nazmi was charged with violating the 10–day notice requirement to inform the police of the Black 505 rally, held at the Kelana Jaya Stadium nine days earlier.

On Nov 1, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed his application to strike out the charge, saying the notice was constitutional. However, five months later, the Court of Appeal reversed that position and declared Section 9(5) of the Act null and void as it was unconstitutional to criminalise the fundamental right to gather.

Nik Nazmi said he was relieved by the decision as it did not just affect him but any other person who took part in an assembly.

His lawyer N. Surendren said the AGC’s withdrawal of the appeal put to rest any doubt about the permanence of the Court of Appeal declaration.

“Now people are free to gather without submitting a 10–day notice. This will affect the way future assemblies are managed," claimed Nik Nazmi, who is Seri Setia assemblyman.

© Copyright Reserved 2025. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a