• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Malaysian Bar Library
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • MyBar Pro Bono Hub
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Legal and General News
  • General News
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Go back to list
Don’t let anger cloud judgment 5 Mar 2008 12:00 am

©The Star (Used by permission)
Comment by Wong Chun Wai

Urban voters are angry. But they have to vote wisely or risk throwing the baby out with the bathwater. 

LET’S be frank. If you are living in Kuala Lumpur, Penang or Perak, there is a high possibility that you are an angry voter who wants to put a cross on the ballot paper for the Opposition.

Some are so upset with the Government, that it doesn’t really matter whether the candidate is from the DAP, Parti Keadilan Rakyat or PAS as long as he or she is in the Opposition. 

But this is what democracy is all about. Elections are about making a choice and essentially, in Malaysia, the voter votes for either Barisan Nasional or for the Opposition.  

In middle–class urban Malaysia, it would seem that the fastest way to be popular these days is to ride the anti–establishment mood.  

As for a journalist, he is deemed credible, courageous and objective when he takes a swipe at the leadership and backs the Opposition. 

Those who talk about freedom of speech can be incredibly intolerant of contrasting viewpoints. Some resort to name–calling and personal attacks instead of trying to convince or debate a point. 

Let’s put it this way. We know the current system is flawed. Many of us are unhappy with our institutions and certainly much more should be done. 

The system needs an overhaul and much of the mismanagement and inefficiency is intolerable, but the question is whether there is a better alternative.  

But when non–Muslims talk about wanting to vote PAS, which has no qualms about changing our way of life, then we need a serious re–think. 

For the past two weeks, statements by PAS leaders have shown that they have not changed, not that they ever promised that they would change in the first place. 

PAS spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat told his listeners at Nikko Hotel that those who vote for PAS would go to heaven. I guess that will not include many non–believers like me. 

Turbaned PAS president Datuk Abdul Hadi Awang said it was perfectly acceptable to character assassinate political rivals. Before that, he refused to shake the hand of his Barisan Nasional challenger on Nomination Day.  

But that’s nothing unusual.  

In 2003, I had my first taste of Hadi’s wrath when my colleague crime desk editor Lourdes Charles and I wrote about the meeting that the fiery PAS leader had with radical Indonesians like Abubakar Ba’asyir and Agus Dwikarna. 

These figures are classified as terrorists by many countries because of their links with al–Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiah. 

Agus, who heads the militant Laskar Jundullah (Army of Allah) in Makassar, Sulawesi, is known for targeting American tourists in hotels. He is serving a 17–year jail term for illegal possession of explosives and suspected involvement in bombings in Manila and Jakarta. 

The meeting, according to Indonesian academicians Dias Pradadimara and Burhan Junedding in the respectable magazine Inside Indonesia (October–December 2002), was a follow–up meeting of mujahidin in Yogjakarta to “integrate the aims and actions of all mujahidin to implement Islamic law.”  

According to the writers, quasi–military groups from all over south Sulawesi were present.  

The report irked Hadi, who admitted being at the meeting but said the Indonesian and Malaysian governments were aware of the three–day meeting and there was nothing sinister about it.  

That’s fair enough. 

But at a stadium in Terengganu, in front of thousands of supporters, he decreed that Charles and I were “anti–Islam” and “infidels”. 

We subsequently received death threats and police reports had to be made. To be labelled “anti–Islam” is certainly serious. The police traced some of these calls but we decided not to pursue the matter, even though the culprits (PAS members) were identified. 

Fast forward to 2008. Have things changed? No. There is still no place for non–Muslims in PAS, not even as associate members. 

Incredibly, there are non–Muslims who are shamelessly contesting as members of the so–called PAS Supporters Club, not realising they have joined in to advocate the orthodox Islamic system being pursued by PAS. 

That would mean more gender segregation in supermarket checkout lines, concerts and, of course, at swimming pools.  

Yes, that would also mean watching movies with the lights on. If that is fine with you, then go ahead and vote for PAS. 

Today, there are well–intentioned but misguided non–Muslims who are helping to campaign for PAS. Some even endorse the party even though it has a long history of criticising other religions. 

The only excuse given by those who back PAS is that in Kelantan, there are temples and churches. What a pathetic argument because these places of worship exist in other states, too! 

The PAS government removed deer statues in a Kota Baru roundabout when it took over Kelantan because it was unIslamic. Next, Hadi ordered the statue of the giant leatherback turtle in a Kuala Terengganu roundabout removed. 

Yes, Kelantan has one of the biggest Buddha statues at Wat Machimaran in Tumpat but it has remained untouched because it has been there for a long time. Still, we remember how PAS cheered when the Taliban destroyed the giant Buddha carvings in Bamiyan, Afghanistan, deemed a World Heritage Site by Unesco. 

True, there are local authorities in states controlled by the Barisan that have been unfair to many temple and church groups. Certainly, no one can deny that many of us cannot accept the ban on Christian books in Bahasa Indonesia. 

But the action of certain extremist officers, at the lower level, should not be lumped as a policy endorsed by the Government. In these cases, the Government has intervened to put things right.  

But we agree that these stop–gap measures cannot continue. There must be a clear and firm policy against officers who put non–Muslim religious groups in a fix. 

And, yes, the local authorities should know better than to demolish a Hindu temple before Deepavali. It is simply wrong, and there are no two ways about it, even if it sits on illegal land, as Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has conceded. 

When such things happen, the Government gets the blame. These officers can only be regarded as saboteurs. 

From supporting the blasting of the Buddha statues in Afghanistan to calling Umno “infidel” for working with non–Muslim political parties and to the late Shahnon Ahmad’s book, SHIT, PAS has consistently demonstrated what it wants to pursue. 

There are new and moderate leaders like Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar and Datuk Husam Musa, but unfortunately, they are outnumbered by the likes of Hadi. 

Let’s not send the wrong message to PAS by giving the impression that we endorse its agenda.  

At a time when there is increasing conservatism in this country, with Muslim–based parties competing to show their religious fervour, it would be strategically wrong to endorse an Islamist party, simply to punish Umno.  

The fact that PAS has stopped talking about implementing syariah law, for political expediency, doesn’t mean they have given up.  

We must keep our liberal way of life. This is Malaysia, not the Middle East.  


PAS’ Controversial Statements

Aug 15, 1997: Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was labelled murtad (apostate) for his remarks over three Muslim contestants prosecuted by the Syariah Court in Selangor for taking part in a beauty contest. 

July 16, 2002: PAS reportedly distributed posters depicting Dr Mahathir as a Catholic priest, labelled “Mahathir Paderi Besar Gereja”.  

Aug 1, 2002: Former PAS MP Bunyamin Yaakob was investigated by police for alleging that Dr Mahathir had watched a pornographic video with his grandchildren. 

Aug 12, 1999: The late PAS president Datuk Fadzil Noor allegedly linked Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's family name with taking care of pigs. Fazdil later said he had no intention of insulting Abdullah but maintained his remarks were factually right. 

March 3, 2004: PAS reportedly questioned Abdullah's integrity as a man of religion and attacked his late wife, Datin Seri Endon Mahmood, for not wearing the tudung. 

July 7, 2006: PAS Dewan Ulama chief Datuk Harun Taib labelled Umno as kafir (infidels). He said he was merely following PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang's fatwa (decree) on April 7, 1981, that Umno was an infidel party. 

Feb 18, 2008: PAS spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat said Umno members were orang utan as they did not know Islam or anything about the law. 

© Copyright Reserved 2026. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.

Type “Hi” to begin your chat.

Do not share confidential or sensitive information. Verify any AI-generated content independently.

Disclaimer

This pilot chatbot service only provides information for general reference. The information provided does not constitute legal or professional advice. By continuing, you acknowledge that your input will be processed by AI, and you understand that AI-generated information may be inaccurate or incomplete and should be independently verified. Do not disclose confidential or sensitive information.

The Malaysian Bar is not liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any of the information provided. By using this service, you accept the applicable Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a