• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • About Us
  • Previous Committees
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
About Us
Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
  • About Us
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Elections
President's Corner
  • Roll of Presidents
  • Press Statements
Committees
  • * Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Non-Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Contempt of Court
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Legal Services Blueprint
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Personal Data Protection
  • Ad Hoc Pandemic Response
  • Advocacy Training Committee
  • Arbitration
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • Building
  • Child Rights
  • Civil Law
  • Committee on AMLA
  • Committee On Orang Asli Rights
  • Committee on Reform to the Legal Sector
  • Common Bar Course
  • Constitutional Law Committee
  • Construction Law
  • Conveyancing Practice
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Court Liaison
  • Criminal Law
  • Cyberlaw
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • Family Law
  • Finance
  • Human Rights
  • Industrial and Employment Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2022
  • International Professional Services (formerly known as Trade In Legal Services)
  • Islamic Finance
  • IT, Innovation and Future in Technology
  • Law Reform and Special Areas
  • LawCare
  • Legal Databases Liaison
  • Legal Profession
  • Mediation
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
  • National Legal Aid
  • National Young Lawyers and Pupils
  • Personal Injury Claims and Awards
  • Professional Indemnity Insurance
  • Professional Standards and Development
  • Publications
  • Risk Management
  • Shipping and Admiralty Law
  • Small Firms Practice
  • Solicitors' Remuneration Enforcement Committee
  • Sports
  • Syariah Law
  • Task Force on Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission ("IPCMC") and Police Accountability
  • Women's Rights
  • Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan Committee
Previous Committees
  • * Previous Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Amendments to the LPA
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Anti Money Laundering
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Benchmarking Law Firms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Commission
  • Ad Hoc Committee On National Legal Aid Foundation
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Quality and Standards
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Rules and Regulations
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Gender Issues & Equal Opportunities (2005-2007)
  • Institutional and Law Reform
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2012
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2014
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2018
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2020
  • LawCare Fund Management
  • Library
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2007
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2010
  • Motor Insurance Review Ad Hoc Committee
  • No-Fault Liability Scheme
  • Practice Management Support Committee
  • Safer Malaysia
  • Standing Committee for the Promotion of Best Practices by Detaining Authorities (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Court Rules (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Eliminating Discrimination (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee to Review LPA 1976
  • Study Loan
  • Task Force on Combined Rules of Court
  • Task Force to Review the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards
Contacts
  • Web Administrator
  • Complaints
  • Legal Aid Centres
  • State Bar Committees
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council
Advertising
  • Advertise with Bar Council
  • Go back to list
IMLC 2016 | The Hague Convention: Beacon of Light in a Dark Tunnel 23 Sep 2016 12:00 am

The Bar Council's International Malaysia Law Conference 2016 ("IMLC 2016") was held at The Royale Chulan Kuala Lumpur from 21 to 23 Sept 2016.

By Goh Siu Lin

The distinguished speakers at the session on the Hague Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction — The Right Honourable Justice Dato’ Dr Hj Mohd Na’im Hj Mokhtar, Chief Syarie Judge of Selangor; Anselmo Reyes, Professor of Legal Practice at Hong Kong University; Malathi Das from Joyce A Tan & Partners LLC, Singapore; and Kiran Dhaliwal of Y N Foo & Partners — shed light on the fraught area of international child abduction. The session was moderated by Goh Siu Lin of Shook Lin & Bok.

Mr Reyes provided a global overview of the experiences of Hague and non–Hague Convention signatory countries. He spoke about the longterm effects and child trauma caused by parental child abduction, and the urgent need to have a cross–border mechanism to speedily return children. Some countries have held back from becoming signatories on the misunderstanding that changes in domestic law are involved. Hague laws operate to return the child to the jurisdiction of habitual residence. The issues of custody, access and maintenance are to be decided by the courts of the home country.

Mr Reyes explained that the Convention has been working well and is constantly being fine–tuned. The Central Authority acts to smoothen the process of child recovery to assist the left–behind parent who may lack the resources and finances.

Ms Kiran spoke from the civil practitioner’s perspective, illustrated by two case studies. First, the Gillespie case which posed the legal quandary caused by Malaysia’s dual system. The mother was non–Muslim, and the children, Muslims. The issue arose as to which court was to have jurisdiction over the custodial dispute.

The second case involved a 10–year–old Malaysian child who was removed to Singapore in defiance of a Malaysian custody order obtained by the father. The matter was resolved amicably through the cooperation of lawyers. If Malaysia had been a Hague signatory country, an administrative application could have been filed for the child’s immediate return. This would prevent forum shopping.

Finally, she spoke about the practical problems when a parent seeks the return of an abducted child. Regrettably, as a non–Hague signatory country, Malaysia is viewed with suspicion, resulting in reluctance to order a return, which is exacerbated by the issue of unilateral conversions to Islam.

Justice Dato’ Dr Mohd Na’im said there have only been two reported cases of international child abduction handled by the Syariah Courts: the Gillespie case and Ismail Arifin (Lepat). The Judge opined that the court represents the ruler and the civil/Syariah court is to show obedience to an order for custody. If the return of the child cannot be materialised without using certain instruments, then the Hague Convention can be used as a basis of returning the child to the custodial parent. The Judge acknowledged that existing domestic laws are insufficient, and felt it was timely for Malaysia to consider acceding to the Convention.

Ms Malathi spoke on the Singapore experience as a new Hague signatory party in 2010, and the application of the Convention in the first local case, which was litigated up to the Court of Appeal.

She also looked into the principles adopted by the Singapore courts in cases involving non–Convention countries and concluded with how the Hague laws in Singapore apply uniformly to Muslims and non–Muslims. She said that the success of the Convention would ultimately depend on the re–education of the government, judiciary and child welfare authorities to abandon the practice of using the child’s interests to justify retaining the child in the country of abduction.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Click here for more news about IMLC 2016.

© Copyright Reserved 2022. Bar Council Malaysia.
 

I'm a