• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • About Us
  • Previous Committees
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
About Us
Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
  • About Us
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Elections
President's Corner
  • Roll of Presidents
  • Press Statements
Committees
  • * Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Non-Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Contempt of Court
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Legal Services Blueprint
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Personal Data Protection
  • Ad Hoc Pandemic Response
  • Advocacy Training Committee
  • Arbitration
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • Building
  • Child Rights
  • Civil Law
  • Committee on AMLA
  • Committee On Orang Asli Rights
  • Committee on Reform to the Legal Sector
  • Common Bar Course
  • Constitutional Law Committee
  • Construction Law
  • Conveyancing Practice
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Court Liaison
  • Criminal Law
  • Cyberlaw
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • Family Law
  • Finance
  • Human Rights
  • Industrial and Employment Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2022
  • International Professional Services (formerly known as Trade In Legal Services)
  • Islamic Finance
  • IT, Innovation and Future in Technology
  • Law Reform and Special Areas
  • LawCare
  • Legal Databases Liaison
  • Legal Profession
  • Mediation
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
  • National Legal Aid
  • National Young Lawyers and Pupils
  • Personal Injury Claims and Awards
  • Professional Indemnity Insurance
  • Professional Standards and Development
  • Publications
  • Risk Management
  • Shipping and Admiralty Law
  • Small Firms Practice
  • Solicitors' Remuneration Enforcement Committee
  • Sports
  • Syariah Law
  • Task Force on Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission ("IPCMC") and Police Accountability
  • Women's Rights
  • Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan Committee
Previous Committees
  • * Previous Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Amendments to the LPA
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Anti Money Laundering
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Benchmarking Law Firms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Commission
  • Ad Hoc Committee On National Legal Aid Foundation
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Quality and Standards
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Rules and Regulations
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Gender Issues & Equal Opportunities (2005-2007)
  • Institutional and Law Reform
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2012
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2014
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2018
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2020
  • LawCare Fund Management
  • Library
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2007
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2010
  • Motor Insurance Review Ad Hoc Committee
  • No-Fault Liability Scheme
  • Practice Management Support Committee
  • Safer Malaysia
  • Standing Committee for the Promotion of Best Practices by Detaining Authorities (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Court Rules (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Eliminating Discrimination (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee to Review LPA 1976
  • Study Loan
  • Task Force on Combined Rules of Court
  • Task Force to Review the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards
Contacts
  • Web Administrator
  • Complaints
  • Legal Aid Centres
  • State Bar Committees
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council
Advertising
  • Advertise with Bar Council
  • Go back to list
IMLC 2016 | Investment Arbitration: The Asian–Pacific Landscape 22 Sep 2016 12:00 am

The Bar Council's International Malaysia Law Conference 2016 ("IMLC 2016") was held at The Royale Chulan Kuala Lumpur from 21 to 23 Sept 2016.

By Louis Liaw

The first breakout session of IMLC 2016 under the Business Law stream, entitled “Investment Arbitration”, focused on Investor State Dispute Settlement (“ISDS”), also known as treaty arbitration. Associate Professor Michael Ewing–Chow, WTO Chair of National University of :Singapore, began by first stating that ISDS has been used as a major point of criticism against international trade agreements, including the TPPA. It is because it is included in these trade agreements that when there are disputes, including when states are sued by corporations ie for failing to fulfil the corporation’s legitimate expectation when it invested in the state, the dispute shall be resolved through ISDS, which is adjudication through an international arbitrator as opposed to the normal court system. Considering the high stakes involved, for example the precedents of countries being ordered to pay billions out of these suits, ISDS does not use a precedent system as courts do, and thus lacks the predictability and certainty of outcome. Furthermore, the supranational nature of ISDS also leads to the possibility of a suit against a government that lost in national courts getting a second bite of the cherry through ISDS.

However, Mr Ewing–Chow argued that ISDS is necessary for various reasons such as the lack of confidence in a states’ Judiciary, especially among those of the Asian countries, and the perception of bias when a suit against the government of a particular state is heard before the judiciary of the state.

Lucy Reed, Professor and Director at National University of Singapore, was the second to speak and began by saying she was surprised at the criticisms towards ISDS. Ms Reed argued that ISDS has improved greatly since it first started and is now a much more balanced and fair adjudication system that takes care of the interest of the state, the corporations, and the public. Furthermore, trade agreements have also improved by including clauses that allows self–judging. Finally, Ms Reed also argued that the jurisprudence for treaty arbitration has matured so much, and that there is now consistency and predictability.

In addition to what Ms Reed said, Avinash Pradhan from Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP reminded delegates that governments will only be sued and resort to ISDS when they breach minimal standards such as failing to provide fair and equitable treatment towards investing corporations. Therefore, the provision of ISDS should not cause a fear as being a supranational adjudication system, but instead be treated as an incentive for governments to behave. He urged a focus on the improvement of ISDS instead of its elimination.

The last speaker was Kamraj Nayagam from Mah–Kamariyah & Philip Koh, who stated that investment arbitration is a growing sector in the Malaysian legal industry, as more companies and individuals are only beginning to recognise this  form of dispute resolution, as well as due to the increasing international trade agreements that countries enter into, including Malaysia.

The panel then concluded by stating that if there is international trade and there are trade agreements, there are bound to be disputes, which are best resolved through an independent mechanism like ISDS.

This session was moderated by Philip Koh of Mah–Kamariyah & Philip Koh.

This session was sponsored by Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration ("KLRCA").

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Click here for more news about IMLC 2016.

© Copyright Reserved 2022. Bar Council Malaysia.
 

I'm a