• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • MyBar Pro Bono Hub
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • About Us
  • Committees
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
About Us
Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
  • About Us
  • Bar Council Members
  • Malaysian Bar Secretariat
  • Elections
President's Corner
  • Roll of Chairmen / Presidents
  • Press Statements
Committees
  • * Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Non-Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Contempt of Court
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Corporatisation of Law Firms and Multi-Disciplinary Practice
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Legal Services Blueprint
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Personal Data Protection
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Prison Reforms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Sectoral Law and Practice Integration
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Sectoral Law and Practice Integration
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Statelessness
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Touting
  • Ad Hoc Pandemic Response
  • Ad Hoc Parliament Liaison Committee
  • Ad Hoc Peer Support Network
  • Ad Hoc Waqf Committee
  • Advocacy Training
  • AMLA Training Committee
  • Animal Rights Committee
  • Anti-Touting Committee
  • Arbitration
  • Art and Law Committee
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • Building
  • Child Rights
  • Civil Law and Law Reform Committee
  • Committee on AMLA
  • Committee on Orang Asli Rights
  • Committee on Persons with Disabilities
  • Committee on Reform to the Legal Sector
  • Constitutional Law Committee
  • Construction Law
  • Conveyancing Practice
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Court Liaison
  • Criminal Law
  • Cyber and Privacy Laws Committee
  • Cyberlaw
  • Digital and Communications Committee
  • Enforcement Committee
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • Family Law
  • Finance
  • Human Rights
  • Industrial and Employment Law
  • INSAF Committee
  • Integration
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2026 Organising Committee
  • International Policy and Practice Committee
  • Islamic Finance
  • Joint Committee on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)
  • Joint Working Committee on ELEVATE
  • Joint Working Task Force to Reform the Healthcare Dispute Resolution System
  • Law Reform and Special Areas
  • LAWASIA Conference 2024 Organising Committee
  • LawCare
  • Legal Databases Liaison
  • Legal Profession
  • Legal Profession Practical Course Committee
  • Legal Tech, AI and Sandbox Committee
  • Mediation
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
  • MyBar Academy
  • MyBar Ageing Rights Advisory ("MBARA") Committee
  • MyBar Carnival Organising Committee
  • National Legal Aid Committee
  • National Young Lawyers and Pupils Committee
  • Personal Injury Claims and Awards
  • Professional Indemnity Insurance Committee
  • Professional Standards and Development
  • Publications
  • Risk Management
  • Shipping and Admiralty Law
  • Small Firms Practice
  • Solicitors' Remuneration Enforcement
  • Sports
  • Sports and e-Sports Law Practice Committee
  • Strategic Litigation Committee
  • Syariah Court Liaison Committee
  • Syariah Law
  • Task Force on Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission ("IPCMC") and Police Accountability
  • Tax and Customs Committee
  • Tender Review Committee
  • Trade in Legal Services Committee
  • Trade in Legal Services Committee
  • Women's Rights
  • Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan Committee
Previous Committees
  • * Previous Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Amendments to the LPA
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Anti-Money Laundering
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Benchmarking Law Firms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Commission
  • Ad Hoc Committee On National Legal Aid Foundation
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Quality and Standards
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Rules and Regulations
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Gender Issues & Equal Opportunities (2005-2007)
  • Institutional and Law Reform
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2012
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2014
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2018
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2020
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2022
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2023
  • LawCare Fund Management
  • Library
  • Malaysian Law Conference 2007
  • Malaysian Law Conference 2010
  • Motor Insurance Review Ad Hoc Committee
  • No-Fault Liability Scheme
  • Practice Management Support
  • Safer Malaysia
  • Standing Committee for the Promotion of Best Practices by Detaining Authorities (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Court Rules (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Eliminating Discrimination (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee to Review LPA 1976
  • Study Loan
  • Task Force on Combined Rules of Court
  • Task Force to Review the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards
Contacts
  • Web Administrator
  • Complaints
  • Legal Aid Centres
  • State Bar Committees
  • Malaysian Bar Secretariat
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council
Advertising
  • Advertise with Bar Council
Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Go back to list
Lawyer: Immigration liable for contempt for deporting against court order 24 Feb 2021 5:41 pm

This article was first published in Malaysiakini, and is reproduced with permission.

 

by Annabelle Lee
17 May 2020

The Immigration Department's move to go ahead with its deportation exercise despite a court order against it could amount to contempt of court, said the Bar Council's M Ramachevam.

In a comment to Malaysiakini, the Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee chairperson said the deportation should have been held off.

"The action taken to deport the Myanmar nationals despite the stay order may amount to contempt of court.

"Status quo should have been maintained until 10am tomorrow pending further orders from the court in respect of the court proceedings that have commenced," he said.

Immigration director-general Khairul Dzaimee Daud said this evening that 1,086 Myanmar nationals - all undocumented - were sent home on three Myanmar navy ships today.

This morning the Kuala Lumpur High Court granted an interim stay against the department's plan to deport 1,200 Myanmar nationals until 10am tomorrow (Feb 24).

Ramachelvam said immigration would have been aware of the court order.

"The defendants would have been aware of the interim stay as they were represented by the Attorney-General's Chambers," he said.

He added that it was up to the applicants - NGOs Amnesty International Malaysia and Asylum Access Malaysia - to apply to the court to commence contempt proceedings.

The immigration department has yet to respond to Malaysiakini's request for comment over the deportation exercise.

Khairul insisted today that none of the 1,086 were ethnic Rohingya or asylum seekers.

However, UN refugee agency UNHCR said it could not verify this as it was not given access to the deportees. It previously urged Putrajaya to stop its deportation plans, concerned that women and children may be involved.

The deportation comes after the Myanmar military seized power from its civilian government.

Putrajaya had previously expressed "serious concern" over the coup.

Malaysia does not recognise refugees and regards the latter as undocumented migrants.

Despite the non-recognition, the country is home to an estimated 154,000 refugees from Myanmar, apart from the larger number of undocumented migrant workers.

Meanwhile, Amnesty International Malaysia executive director Katrina Jorene Maliamauv expressed shock over the government's move to deport the Myanmar nationals despite the court order.

"The Malaysian government's decision to deport people in defiance of an order from the High Court today was inhumane and devastating. We believed that with a court order, those due to be deported would be safe, and so we are shocked that the government went ahead with the deportation.

"It appears the authorities railroaded this shockingly cruel deportation before any proper scrutiny of the decision, and in spite of week-long calls for a proper assessment of the people on the list," she said in a statement.

She added that the deportation "undertaken in secrecy", and without access for the UN to the vulnerable people must not be allowed to happen again.

"Authorities must restore UN access to detention centres and allow it to carry out its life-saving work.

"Detention solely for immigration control should not be allowed to continue, and the government must work towards the release of those detained for this reason," she said.

Amnesty's lawyer Lim Wei Jiet said the immigration's action today speaks volumes of its respect towards the law.

"We are shocked at the authorities' disregard for a specific court order to stop the deportation.

"It was merely to stop the deportation for less than 24 hours. This conduct speaks volumes of their respect towards the law," Lim said.

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) executive director Sevan Doraisamy pointed that the Immigration Department should be held responsible for defying a court order.

"Since the Attorney-General had dragged Malaysiakini to court for contempt of court proceedings because of five readers’ comments, we expect him to remain consistent and immediately begin proceedings to hold both the Home Ministry and Immigration Department liable to contempt of court – for they have done far more damage to our judiciary system and serve to undermine the public's view about court orders," he said in a statement.

© Copyright Reserved 2026. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a