• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • About Us
  • Committees
  • Conveyancing Practice
About Us
Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
  • About Us
  • Bar Council Members
  • Malaysian Bar Secretariat
  • Elections
President's Corner
  • Roll of Presidents
  • Press Statements
Committees
  • * Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Non-Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Conditional Fee Rules (Re Personal Injuries)
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Contempt of Court
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Corporatisation of Law Firms and Multi-Disciplinary Practice
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Legal Services Blueprint
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Personal Data Protection
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Prison Reforms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Sectoral Law and Practice Integration
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Sectoral Law and Practice Integration
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Statelessness
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Touting
  • Ad Hoc Pandemic Response
  • Ad Hoc Parliament Liaison Committee
  • Ad Hoc Peer Support Network
  • Ad Hoc Waqf Committee
  • Advocacy Training
  • AMLA Training Committee
  • Animal Rights Committee
  • Anti-Touting Committee
  • Arbitration
  • Art and Law Committee
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • Building
  • Child Rights
  • Civil Law and Law Reform Committee
  • Committee on AMLA
  • Committee on Orang Asli Rights
  • Committee on Persons with Disabilities
  • Committee on Reform to the Legal Sector
  • Constitutional Law Committee
  • Construction Law
  • Conveyancing Practice
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Court Liaison
  • Criminal Law
  • Cyber and Privacy Laws Committee
  • Cyberlaw
  • Digital and Communications Committee
  • Enforcement Committee
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • Family Law
  • Finance
  • Human Rights
  • Industrial and Employment Law
  • INSAF Committee
  • Integration
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2026 Organising Committee
  • International Policy and Practice Committee
  • Islamic Finance
  • Joint Committee on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)
  • Joint Working Committee on ELEVATE
  • Joint Working Task Force to Reform the Healthcare Dispute Resolution System
  • Law Reform and Special Areas
  • LAWASIA Conference 2024 Organising Committee
  • LawCare
  • Legal Databases Liaison
  • Legal Profession
  • Legal Profession Practical Course Committee
  • Legal Tech, AI and Sandbox Committee
  • Mediation
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
  • MyBar Academy
  • MyBar Ageing Rights Advisory ("MBARA") Committee
  • MyBar Carnival Organising Committee
  • National Legal Aid Committee
  • National Young Lawyers and Pupils Committee
  • Personal Injury Claims and Awards
  • Professional Indemnity Insurance Committee
  • Professional Standards and Development
  • Publications
  • Risk Management
  • Shipping and Admiralty Law
  • Small Firms Practice
  • Solicitors' Remuneration Enforcement
  • Sports
  • Sports and e-Sports Law Practice Committee
  • Strategic Litigation Committee
  • Syariah Court Liaison Committee
  • Syariah Law
  • Task Force on Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission ("IPCMC") and Police Accountability
  • Tax and Customs Committee
  • Tender Review Committee
  • Trade in Legal Services Committee
  • Trade in Legal Services Committee
  • Women's Rights
  • Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan Committee
Previous Committees
  • * Previous Committees | Introduction
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Amendments to the LPA
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Anti-Money Laundering
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Benchmarking Law Firms
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Commission
  • Ad Hoc Committee On National Legal Aid Foundation
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Quality and Standards
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Rules and Regulations
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Gender Issues & Equal Opportunities (2005-2007)
  • Institutional and Law Reform
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2012
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2014
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2018
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2020
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2022
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2023
  • LawCare Fund Management
  • Library
  • Malaysian Law Conference 2007
  • Malaysian Law Conference 2010
  • Motor Insurance Review Ad Hoc Committee
  • No-Fault Liability Scheme
  • Practice Management Support
  • Safer Malaysia
  • Standing Committee for the Promotion of Best Practices by Detaining Authorities (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Court Rules (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Eliminating Discrimination (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee to Review LPA 1976
  • Study Loan
  • Task Force on Combined Rules of Court
  • Task Force to Review the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards
Contacts
  • Web Administrator
  • Complaints
  • Legal Aid Centres
  • State Bar Committees
  • Malaysian Bar Secretariat
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council
Advertising
  • Advertise with Bar Council
Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Go back to list
Significance of Share Units in Strata Development (Part One) 4 Nov 2019 1:09 pm

©The Star Online (Used by permission)
by Andrew Wong Fook Hin
 
Much has been said recently about rates of charges for strata properties. In relation to that, share units of such properties have featured prominently.
 
This article (part 1) seeks to trace the history and to demystify the concept of share units and how it applies to the management of strata properties.
 
Purpose of share units
 
Share units are important to strata property owners for three reasons:
 
> They determine the amount of charges payable;
 
> They determine the number of votes on a voting by poll; and
 
> In respect of an owner of two or more parcels, they determine the number of individuals that may be nominated by him for election as a committee member, subject to a threshold.
 
The importance of share units is based on the concept that the more share units you have, the more you pay, the more voting rights you have and the more representatives you may nominate to be elected as committee members.
 
Determining the amount of charges payable by a strata owner for the maintenance and management of the common property is nothing new for housing accommodation. On April 1,1989, when the Housing Developers (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 (1989 Regulations) came into force, the sale and purchase agreement for strata properties between a housing developer and a purchaser was regulated by a prescribed contract of sale under Schedule H (Schedule H SPA).
 
In that first Schedule H SPA, it was provided that from the date the purchaser takes vacant possession of his parcel, he shall pay a fair and justifiable proportion of the costs and expenses for the maintenance and management of the common property, and the amount payable shall be determined according to provisional share units assigned to the parcel by the developer's architect. In a 2007 amendment to the Schedule H SPA, the word "architect" was replaced by "licensed land surveyors".
 
Commercial strata properties
 
There are no laws or regulations regulating the sale by a developer of non-housing or commercial strata properties, and in such cases, the determination of charges payable by a commercial strata owner was governed by contractual provisions, until April 12,2007 when the Building and Common Property (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007 (BCPA) came into force.
 
The BCPA was legislated to provide for proper maintenance of building and common property in respect of strata properties (housing and commercial).
 
Under the BCPA, the purchaser and the developer (in respect of unsold parcels) are required to pay charges for the maintenance and management of the common property and the apportionment of charges shall be determined in proportion to the share units assigned to each parcel by the developer's licensed land surveyor (the allocated share units).
 
On June 1,2015, the BCPA was repealed and replaced by the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA). The SMA continued to provide that the amount of charges payable by a strata owner shall be determined by share units.
 
Formulas for assigning share units
 
There are many formulas used for assigning share units. We will look at some of these which are used in Malaysia.
 
In drafting the provisions of the SMA, appropriate authorities were well aware that in many development areas no share units have been assigned to each parcel by the developer's licensed land surveyor at the time of sale and that is the reason for the SMA to make a provision that in such a case, the share units for each parcel shall be assigned by any person or body who has a duty or is responsible under the SMA to maintain and manage any building and the common property in accordance with the formula set out in the First Schedule of the SMA (First Schedule Formula).
 
Assigning share units using the First Schedule Formula
 
The First Schedule Formula is as follows:
 
Allocated share unit of parcel = (area of parcel x WF1 x WF2) + (area of accessory parcel x WF3).
 
In calculating the share units, basically three weightage factors have to be taken into consideration:
 
> the type of parcel (e.g. whether for apartments or office complexes or retail complexes or hotel complexes or industrial complexes or car parks or shop-houses, shop-apartments and shop-offices (WF1);
 
> whether it is a whole floor parcel (WF2); and whether there are accessory parcels (outside or within the building) (WF3).
 
In assigning share units for each type of parcel (WF1), additional factors to be taken into consideration are whether or not there is air-conditioning to common areas of corridors, lobbies and foyers and whether or not there is benefit of common lift or escalator facilities.
 
In general, taking all weightage factors into consideration, an apartment parcel would be assigned fewer share units than a retail parcel or a hotel parcel.
 
It is pertinent to note that the First Schedule Formula is only to be used or applicable, in a development area where no share units have been assigned to each parcel at the time of sale before June 1 2015.
 
SiFUS
 
For any new sale by a developer after June 1 2015, the SMA requires a developer to file with the Commissioner of Buildings, a schedule of parcels showing the proposed share units of each parcel or proposed parcel.
 
The formula for calculating share units shall be stipulated in a Certificate of Share Unit Formula (SiFUS) issued by the Land and Mines director (PTG) of each state.
 
All applications for the SiFUS in each state shall follow the formula prescribed in the relevant strata title rules of each state, which came into force on various dates in each state in 2015 and 2016 (STR).
 
However, the PTG may exempt an applicant from using the prescribed formula in the STR, i.e. an applicant may propose a different formula and it will be for the PTG to determine whether the proposed share units are equitable.
 
The formula stipulated in the STR is similar to the First Schedule Formula, except that the First Schedule Formula did not provide for assignment of share units in respect of land parcels, presumably because at the material time there were no development areas where vacant possession of land parcels have been delivered by a developer to purchasers where no share units have been assigned to each land parcel.
 
Calculation of share units before the First Schedule Formula and the STR
 
Before Oct 31 2008, share units were calculated principally based on the area of the parcel.
 
On Oct 31, 2008 the Land and Mines director-general issued a "Buku Panduan Permohonan Hakmilik Strata: Akta Hakmilik Strata 1985" (KPTG Guidelines) which provided guidelines for proposing share units to be assigned to a parcel in an application for subdivision of a building into parcels each to be held under a separate strata title.
 
The KPTG Guidelines provids a common method for calculation of share units, as follows:
 
> In accordance with the market value of the parcel, in that a parcel with a higher market value will be assigned more share units than a parcel with a lower market value;
 
> in accordance with the selling price of the parcel, in that a parcel with a higher selling rice will be assigned more share units;
 
> in accordance with the value of the parcel as determined by the local authority, that is the value of the parcel for the purpose of payment of assessment rates;
 
> in accordance with the type of parcel, in that a commercial parcel will be assigned more share units that a residential parcel;
 
> in accordance with the location or position of the parcel, in that a luxury apartment at a higher floor will be assigned more share units than a luxury apartment at a lower floor, or in the case of a low cost apartment, a parcel at a lower floor will be assigned more share units than a low cost apartment at a higher floor.
 
The KPTG guidelines also provided certain weightage factors to be taken into consideration in the calculation of proposed share units, e.g:
 
> for a non-mixed development -- share units shall be assigned either based on floor area or on a proportion of the floor area;
 
> for a normal mixed development (shop-house) -- weightage factors of between 1 to 1.5 will be considered to accommodate the different usage of the parcels;
 
> for a mixed complex development (comprising residential, office, commercial, vehicle parking area-commercial, or industrial) -- weightage factors of between one to five5 will be considered to accommodate the different usage of the parcels; and
 
In respect of all the above different types of development, accessory parcels shall be taken into consideration.
 
The writer is of the view that the First Schedule Formula and the formula in the STR are more equitable formulae to assign share units than the KPTG guidelines as more weightage and other additional factors are taken into consideration.
 
In Part 2, the writer will examine the impact of the recent Court of Appeal decision in the JMB Menara Rajawali case, on determination of different rate of charges for different types of parcels and whether one common rate should apply.
 
Andrew Wong Fook Hin, a lawyer practising at Messrs Andrew Wong & Co, is a member of the Conveyancing Practice Committee, Bar Council, Malaysia. This column does not constitute legal advice and the views expressed are solely that of the writer.


Please click here to read part two of the article.

© Copyright Reserved 2025. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a