website statistics
feed
Home arrow News arrow Letters & Others arrow PDRM's Media Statement on the ISA arrests
Advertisement
PDRM's Media Statement on the ISA arrests PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 15 September 2008 08:10pm

Deputy IGPIn recent weeks, there has been an escalation of racially insensitive, seditious and disparaging acts and remarks by individuals and organisations bringing about a state of unrest and religious tension in the country.

When the police decided to invoke the ISA, the decision was based on intelligence and observation that certain acts by the individuals concerned were detrimental to the calm, peace and harmony of the country.

These acts if not curtailed would cause public disorder and be a threat to national security. An arrest under the ISA is only made when the police strongly believes that certain acts by individual can pose a serious threat to public order and national security.

These are the grounds in which the police based their decision on.

When there are reasonable ground the police will act accordingly under the provisions of Section 73(1) of the ISA. An arrest under the Section provides the police with means to investigate and verify whether the intelligence received can be substantiated.

In the case of the Sin Chew Daily news reporter, she was released as soon as the police had verified the intelligence and found no grounds to detain her further.

In the case of Raja Petra Kamaruddin and Teresa Kok, the police need time to investigate further on their alleged involvement in acts that can be considered as prejudicial to the security of the country.

We have 60 days under the ISA to investigate. As soon as we can establish that we have no firm grounds to substantiate our believes that they pose a threat to national security, we will release those persons.

But at any time within the 60 days, we find that our beliefs are substantiated, we will subject the case to the Minister with the recommendation that the person be detained under the Minister’s order of detention under Section 8(1) of the ISA.

In so far as the investigation is concerned, the police will conduct the investigation professionally and expeditiously, as it would not be in the public interest for the police to act otherwise.

The public are hereby advised not to take matters into their own hands except in accordance to law.

Let the police work within the system and laws of the country. Racial and religious unrest can be triggered over small matters and can escalate into situations that are damaging and irreversible.

We cannot allow the May 13, Kg Medan and Kg Rawa incidents to repeat and destroy the country.

The police will have to take pre-emptive measures in order to prevent the situation from getting out of control.

As such, the public must allow the police to act within the perimeters of the law in this country, including the ISA, which is a swift mechanism for effective action.

The police are continuously monitoring the situation and will not hesitate to take action against anyone who continues inciting racial and religious issues which are detrimental to the calm, peace and harmony of the country.

In the interest of the nation’s peace and harmony, the police will act without fear or favour. The police wish to reiterate and affirm that at the current moment, the situation in this country is calm and under control.

Tan Sri Ismail Omar Deputy Inspector General of Police

Comments (5)Add Comment
Oh really.....?
written by Siti Zabedah Kasim, Monday, September 15 2008 09:35 pm

Why then the man who uttered the most racist statement in public and need no further investigation as the evidence of that statement is overwhelming is still free to run about?

Please explain that Tan Sri.

In the interest of the nation's peace and harmony, do what is right for the country, not what is right for the ruling party.

Siti Zabedah Kasim

WHITHER THE TRUTH?
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Monday, September 15 2008 10:56 pm

The Royal Malaysian Police Department won the world's first-ever fight against the armed communist insurrection because the officers at that time fought for the truth.

Their struggle was based on the truth. The people supported the struggle because it was truth that all were upholding.

Today, can we say the same thing about some of our police officers?

It is hard for any self-respecting Malaysian to believe that Teresa Kok poses a threat to national security. What has this seasoned Member of Parliament for His Majesty's Loyal Opposition done to deserve such a grave charge?

As for Raja Petra, I have been reading most of his articles and I have not read any article where he has committed the alleged insult to Islam. Can someone in authority please explain?

The days of the Internal Security Act (ISA) have seen more misuse and abuse than any other Act. It is time we repeal this unconscionable, reprehensible and obnoxious statute.

This country is built on the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

It must create the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It must never use such an unconscionable, reprehensible and obnoxious statute to force the physical separation of families. We want happy families in Malaysia, not dysfunctional ones.

I call on all police officers to return to and observe always their oath of serving the Malaysian nation.

Stephen Tan Ban Cheng

Why under ISA and not under other laws?
written by William Wong Sang Eng, Tuesday, September 16 2008 12:13 am

I hate to repeat this (of what others have said repeatedly). Failure to grasp that ISA is not, I repeat, is not, the proper resort in respect of the arrests and detentions in question((detention for investigation under ISA could be and in Teresa Kok's case (going to be 28 days), is actually longer than ordinary suspected offenders)) would mean that YB Zaid Ibrahim's submission for resignation and other Ministers' objections are either in vain or less intelligent.

For probing into Teresa Kok's alleged involvement in the "Azan" issue, road signages with Jawi Script and another regarding the Selangor Religious Department (JAIS) (as just published here, reported by Teresa's father), (and also Raja Petra K.'s blogs)could there be no other laws under the Penal code or Sedition Act be called in aid for investigation (for which remand is 14 days maximum)? I repeat: could there be no other laws save this draconian terrorising ISA? Are they going to abscond or have they already posed a threat to national security? Are not that all relevant materials that need to be considered, already in the public dormain? Is not the answer to the above question seems obvious?

William Wong Sang Eng

What Kind Of Intelligence?
written by Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul Gafoor, Tuesday, September 16 2008 12:21 pm

The Deputy IGP said this:

'When the police decided to invoke the ISA, the decision was based on intelligence and observation that certain acts by the individuals concerned were detrimental to the calm, peace and harmony of the country.'

Remember during the last General Elections.....the decision to use ink the indelible ink was shelved because there was some intelligence report that some people had bought large quantity of the ink and were planning to disrupt the elections. It was also reported certain arrests were made and people were remanded.

These two excuses which were made public goes on to show how unintelligent can the intelligence be! It is an affront to common sense.

On the other hand i feel miserable to think how many more innocent people became victims of police action based on similar intelligence report.

Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul Gafoor

Insult to my common sense
written by Mohd Yazid Bin Zul Kepli, Tuesday, September 16 2008 03:02 pm

Selective prosecution is one thing. Using ISA on opposition is taking everything to a new level...

Mohd Yazid Bin Zul Kepli


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Username Password
Remember Me | Register | Lost Password?

PKR wants to restore immunity of monarchy



show last 4hrs - 24hrs