feed
Home arrow News arrow Members' Opinions and Comments arrow Why do Malaysians march?
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Why do Malaysians march? PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 03 August 2009 10:20am

Image©The Sun (Used by permission)
by Yeo Yang Poh

WHY march, when the government has said that it will review the Internal Security Act? Why march, when there are other very cosy ways of giving your views and feedback?

One would understand if these were questions posed by nine-year-olds. But they are not. They are questions posed by the prime minister of this nation we call our home. Answer we must. So, why?

Because thousands who died while in detention cannot march or speak any more. That is why others have to do it for them.

Because persons in the corridors of power, persons who have amassed tremendous wealth and live in mansions, and persons who are in the position to right wrongs but won’t, continue to rule our nation with suffocating might. And they certainly would not march. They would prevent others from marching.

Because the have-nots, the sidelined, the oppressed, the discriminated and the persecuted have no effective line to the powerful.

Because the nice ways have been tried ad nauseam for decades, but have fallen on deaf ears.

Because none of the major recommendations of Suhakam (including on peaceful assembly), or of the commissions of inquiry, has been implemented. Because the proposed Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) is not in sight, while corruption and insecurity live in every neighbourhood; and (despite reasoned views expressed ever so nicely in opposition) Rela (people’s volunteer corps) is being brought in to make matters even worse.

The proponents in “Su Qiu” (remember them?) were not marchers. In fact it is hard to find nicer ways than “su qiu”, because the term means “present and request” or “inform and request”. In terms of putting forward a view or a request, it is the height of politeness. Yet they were labelled “extremists” – they who did not march.

And now you ask, why march?

Because you gave non-marchers a false name! You called them the “silent majority”, who by virtue of their silence (so you proudly argued with twisted logic) were supporters of government policies since they were not vocal in raising objections. You claimed to be protecting the interest of the “silent majority”. Now some of them do not want to be silent anymore, and you are asking why?

Yes, because double standards and hypocrisy cannot be covered up or explained away forever; and incompetence cannot be indefinitely propped up by depleting resources.

Because cronyism can only take care of a few people, and the rest will eventually wake up to realise the repeated lies that things were done in certain ways purportedly “for their benefit”.

Because the race card, cleverly played for such a long time, is beginning to be seen for what it really is – a despicable tool to divide the rakyat for easier political manipulation.

Because it does not take much to figure out that there is no good reason why Malaysia, a country with abundant human resources and rich natural resources, does not have a standard of living many times higher than that of Singapore, an island state with no natural resources and that has to import human resources from Malaysia and elsewhere.

Because, in general, countries that do not persecute marchers are prosperous or are improving from their previous state of affairs, and those that do are declining.

Because Gandhi marched, Mandela marched, Martin Luther King marched, and Tunku Abdul Rahman marched.

Because more and more people realise that peaceful assemblies are no threat at all to the security of the nation, although they are a threat to the security of tenure of the ruling elite.

Because politicians do not mean it when they say with a straight face or a smile that they are the servants and that the people are the masters. No servant would treat his master with tear gas, batons and handcuffs.

Because if the marchers in history had been stopped in their tracks, places like India, Malaysia and many others would still be colonies today, apartheid would still be thriving in South Africa, Nelson Mandela would still be scribbling on the walls of Cell 5, and Obama would probably be a slave somewhere in Mississippi plotting to make his next midnight dash for the river.

And because liberty, freedom and dignity are not free vouchers posted out to each household.

They do not come to those who just sit and wait. They have to be fought for, and gained.

And if you still want to ask: why march; I can go on and on until the last tree is felled. But I shall
obviously not.

I will end with the following lines from one of the songs sung in the 1960s by civil rights marchers in the US, without whom Obama would not be able to even sit with the whites in a bus, let alone reside in the White House:

“It isn’t nice to block the doorway
It isn’t nice to go to jail
There are nicer ways to do it
But the nice ways have all failed
It isn’t nice; it isn’t nice
You’ve told us once, you’ve told us twice
But if that’s freedom’s price
We don’t mind ...”

Yeo Yang Poh is a former Bar Council president. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com.
Comments (4)Add Comment
Thousands died in detention
written by Zainur Zakaria, Monday, August 03 2009 03:03 pm

I am shocked to learn from Yeo Yang Poh that thousands have died while in detention. Is he referring to those who died in detention in Malaysia or in other parts of the world? Is the claim true or merely a wild emotional statement. Can Yang Poh please clarify or substantiate his claim.

Zainur Zakaria

Singapore is no shining example of democracy
written by Zainur Zakaria, Monday, August 03 2009 03:10 pm

By the way when we talk of democracy, please stop looking at Singapore as an example. Singapore is no shining example of a democracy. Does singapore allow protest marches?

Zainur Zakaria

Answering Zainur
written by Yeo Yang Poh, Tuesday, August 04 2009 12:20 am

Dear Zainur,

1. On 24/3/09, the Star reported that Home Minister Syed Hamid said that a total of 2,571 detainees died between 1999 and 2008. The figure I suspect would be much higher if one goes back further in time. But then it could have been a wild emotional statement by the Minister.

2. I do not know how you obtained the impression that I had used Singapore as a shining example of democracy. Nothing in my article suggests that at all. Singapore is cited (in one of the many reasons discussed) when making a comparison with regard to the management of economy (with an implied inference of the relative absence of corruption there).

Yeo Yang Poh

Why we want to march?
written by Tan Pean Khoon, Tuesday, August 04 2009 11:28 am

Obviously, the Government is still drafting policy in the comfort of the air-con office/home. Ask them to be watered by water canon together with the amount of tear gas shoot at them and they will never ask this quwstion again. The battle of freedom is not won in the comfort of the air-con room but in the open field.

If they have consider our various request, no one will one to walk on the street and suffer the "punishment". It is YOU that made US walk.

PK Tan


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Talk on Intellectual Property Law (10 Feb 2012)
Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, the talk on “Intellectual Property Law” will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 10 Feb 2012 (Friday). The talk will feature Bahari Yeow Tien Hong. Click on the link above for more details.
Your Login


We have 67 guests and 1 member online

Teoh Beng Hock's family gets leave to appeal

Kamal Hisham Ja'afar



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View Full Calendar
January 2012 February 2012 March 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4
Week 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 9 26 27 28 29
Google