KUALA LUMPUR: In a seminar held at the Auditorium of the Bar
Council on Friday, 4 April 2008 and jointly organised by the Bar Council and the
International Bar Association [IBA] with the kind support of the MacArthur
Foundation entitled “Seminar on the International Criminal Court - The
Relevance of ICC Proceedings to Malaysian Lawyers: What can be gained?”, the
Vice President of the Malaysian Bar, Ragunath Kesavan expressed his hope that
this seminar would be a first step towards Malaysia ratifying the Rome Statute.
He stated categorically the Bar Council’s strong support for
the Rome Statute and urged the Government to ratify, whilst also expressing his
hope that Malaysian lawyers would make themselves more aware of the ICC with a
view to developing their careers.
SUHAKAM Commissioner Tunku Datuk Nazihah Tunku Mohamed Rus in
her opening remarks pointed out that SUHAKAM had hosted a talk by Justice
Phillipe Kirsch, President of the International Criminal Court where she pointed
out that there was a lively discussion amongst invited guests. Calling this
seminar a “timely catalyst” for efforts in Malaysia to create greater awareness,
Tunku Nazihah pointed out that concerns as to national sovereignty were not
insurmountable citing the example of Japan, amongst others, as a country
traditionally very concerned about protecting its national sovereignty that had
nevertheless ratified the ICC recently.
It is hoped that the convening of this seminar and future events on the role of
the ICC will raise civil society awareness and support of the ICC. Indeed K.
Shanmuga, who spoke on behalf of the Bar Council’s Human Rights Committee which
is spearheading the ICC initiative in Malaysia, in his talk “The relevance of
the ICC to Malaysia; nothing to lose, everything to gain”, espoused clearly that
the principle of complementarity safeguards the sovereignty of every State
Party. He also clarified that the ICC was reserved for “serious crimes” as
defined in the Rome Statute. It would be a noble act on the part of this
Government to ratify and accept its goals and aspirations.
In an overview of the ICC, Paolina Massida, the ICC's Principal Counsel for
Victims, pointed out that the beauty of the ICC was that lawyers practising all
over the world are on its Register of lawyers. The victims and aggressors alike
have a right to the register to select their lawyers from the list.
Rupert Skilbeck, the Principal Defender in the Defence Office of the
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia [ECCC], brought by way of
similarities and differences the ECCC experience and its current works under the
auspices of the United Nations. This is a Court for a specific conflict meant to
complete its work within a specific time-frame with specific goals.
It becomes hugely transparent and entirely obvious that the ICC being a
permanent Court is revolutionary in concept and theory! The ICC has evolved from
the United Nations concept of specific ad-hoc tribunals acting after the event
of catastrophe into a permanent hands-on court dealing with serious crimes as
and when it arises. It only now remains for the Security Council’s 60-year right
of veto to also evolve to allow for serious aggression to be addressed almost
immediately, and to prevent civilian casualties in its current magnitude.
Opportunity for Malaysian lawyers
Lawyer N. Sivananthan who is on the list of counsel for the ICC states that
despite the long labourious process of the application, he has found a new
challenge in the international arena. Liliana De Marco informed us that a total
236 lawyers are registered with 4 from Asia. Experience in criminal law is a
must. Every application is vetted and screened. Lawyers are then placed on the
Register according to experience in handling international criminal trials.
Ratify!
Liliana rounded up by stating that the IBA aims to give technical assistance and
create awareness among lawyers about the ICC. Dato' Muhammad Shafee, a SUHAKAM
Commissioner, echoed this sentiment in his closing remarks by emphasising that
the Rome Statute should be seriously looked into because it is the way forward.
There should be more focused movements towards Malaysia ratifying the Statute.
Andrew Khoo, who was the master of ceremonies for the whole event, gave his
concluding remarks as the Deputy Chair of the Bar Council’s Human Rights
Committee by thanking all the speakers and stated we should all look forward to
the next steps ahead.
It is noted that since the Nazi Nuremberg trials in Germany and the Tokyo trials
of World War II, the evolution of an international permanent Court is timely.
The Court acts a deterrent and allows the international community to react more
rapidly to a conflict when it happens.
Malaysia’s international stature and standing in the world today as a nation
that brokers peace and offers peacekeeping troops to troubled countries would be
enhanced by her ratification of the Rome Statute immediately.
Still encouraging although response from lawyers poor. written by Shanmuga Kanesalingam,
Wednesday, April 09 2008 03:45 pm
Although the aim of the seminar was to expose members of the Bar to the ICC and also to show that the ICC is something that could be part of our career development plan, very few actually attended, which was a pity.
However, a number of Judges, members of the AG chambers, civil servants and SUHAKAM staff did attend which was most encouraging. Many of them are directly involved in advising the Malaysian government on whether or not to ratify the Rome Statute.
They participated quite actively in the discussions, and from the questions asked, it seems that the following are still the main concerns of the Government:-
i) sovereignty concerns
ii) the impact ratification would have on our domestic system, particularly vis a vis our continued use of death penalty and some of the more archaic (but pro-prosecution) aspects of our criminal justice system
iii) some suspicion of the effectiveness of the ICC i.e. whether the ICC really is as effective as campaigners for ratification make it out to be
It looks like the Bar Council can really make a difference in this arena, and hopefully more lawyers who are involved in these issues will step forward to assist the Human Rights Committee lobby the government to ratify the Rome Statute.
Shanmuga Kanesalingam
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
2012 Hotel Corporate Rates Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
Talk on Intellectual Property Law (10 Feb 2012) Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, the talk on “Intellectual Property Law” will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 10 Feb 2012 (Friday). The talk will feature Bahari Yeow Tien Hong. Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings (21 Feb 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, the seminar on “The Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings”, featuring Sanjeev Kumar Rasiah, will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 21 Feb 2012 (Tuesday). Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Conveyancing (24 Feb 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, this seminar featuring Jeremiah R Gurusamy will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 24 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Mediation Skills Training Course (29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012) Organised by Bar Council, the Mediation Skills Training Course will take place at 8:30 am to 5:30 pm, at Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012 (Wednesday to Sunday). Deadline for registration and payment is 17 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Talk on “Land Fraud: An Australian Perspective” (13 Mar 2012) Organised by IGIL, GSGSG and UUM COLGIS, this free talk featuring Quintin George Rozario of Delta Law, Brisbane, Australia, will take place at 9:00 am, at Dewan Seminar A, Pusat Konvensyen, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, on 13 Mar 2012 (Tuesday). To RSVP, contact Mr Abutt (04-928 4397; abutt@uum.edu.my).
Although the aim of the seminar was to expose members of the Bar to the ICC and also to show that the ICC is something that could be part of our career development plan, very few actually attended, which was a pity.
However, a number of Judges, members of the AG chambers, civil servants and SUHAKAM staff did attend which was most encouraging. Many of them are directly involved in advising the Malaysian government on whether or not to ratify the Rome Statute.
They participated quite actively in the discussions, and from the questions asked, it seems that the following are still the main concerns of the Government:-
i) sovereignty concerns
ii) the impact ratification would have on our domestic system, particularly vis a vis our continued use of death penalty and some of the more archaic (but pro-prosecution) aspects of our criminal justice system
iii) some suspicion of the effectiveness of the ICC i.e. whether the ICC really is as effective as campaigners for ratification make it out to be
It looks like the Bar Council can really make a difference in this arena, and hopefully more lawyers who are involved in these issues will step forward to assist the Human Rights Committee lobby the government to ratify the Rome Statute.
Shanmuga Kanesalingam