News
Bar News/Berita Badan Peguam
Malaysian Bar convenes meeting to discuss ICC | Malaysian Bar convenes meeting to discuss ICC |
|
|
|
| Contributed by Rajen Devaraj (Director) | |
| Wednesday, 14 February 2007 08:58am | |
|
Ambiga began the meeting by explaining that the International Criminal Court (ICC), set up in the Hague on 1 July 2002, is an independent, permanent court that is meant to try persons accused of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. She said the Malaysian Bar called the meeting because it believed the ICC to be an important international institution deserving the support of all Malaysians. She said that it was important that civil society raise awareness about the ICC and advocate that Malaysia become a signatory to the 1998 international treaty that created the ICC, the Rome Statute. Towards this end the Malaysian Bar had recently become a member of the international coalition for the ICC (http://www.iccnow.org/). After this brief introduction highlights of the DVD "In Search of International Justice" was screened. The DVD outlined the background to the formation of the ICC, how the ICC differed from the ad hoc tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and briefly touched on the US opposition to the formation of the ICC. K. Shanmuga then made a power point presentation outlining key characteristics of the ICC. He explained that the jurisdiction and functioning of the ICC was governed by the Rome Statute. He said that Malaysia is not among the 139 countries that have signed onto the Rome Statute. Shanmuga also made several points on why he felt it would be in Malaysia's own best interests to ratify the Rome Statute and become a full participant in the ICC. Following Shanmuga's presentation there was a free flowing discussion where questions were raised and clarifications made regarding the ICC. Shanmuga explained that the ICC has jurisdiction in three different situations: (1) When the crime was committed by a citizen of a state that had ratified the ICC; (2) When the crime was committed on the territory of a state that had ratified the ICC and (3) When the matter was referred to the ICC by the Security Council. He also clarified that the ICC was not meant for ordinary criminals but reserved for very serious crimes like genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, all of which were carefully defined in the Rome Statute. He said that the ICC had no jurisdiction over crimes that were committed before 2002. In response to a query whether signing on to the ICC would threaten our sovereignty, Shanmuga explained that the ICC will only act if the national court of the accused is unwilling or unable to act. Ambiga said that the Malaysian Bar hoped to form a Malaysian Coalition and mount an awareness campaign about the ICC as well as to take steps to encourage the Malaysian government to sign the Rome Statute. Several organisations present expressed an interest to be part of such a Coalition but others said that they would have to take the matter back to their respective organisations. Ambiga said that if necessary members of the Malaysian Bar would be willing to provide briefings to groups and other interested individuals about the ICC. It was decided that the Malaysian Bar would convene a meeting in about a months time to allow organisations to discuss the matter and come to a decision. The ICC will not prevent the occurrence of crimes against humanity. An effective ICC will however compel individuals to account for the "most serious crimes of concern to the international community". The ICC will also ensure that those who commit war crimes receive a fair trial in accordance with the highest standards of justice. International Criminal Court - Recent Developments by K Shanmuga Comments (5)
![]()
Bar Council initiative to set up CICC most welcome
written by Zainur Zakaria, Wednesday, February 14 2007 11:22 am
My compliment to the Bar Council and particularly the Vice-President, Ambiga Srenevasan, for the initiative to set up the Coalition for the International Criminal Court. I wish the Coalition every success. Well done!
Malaysian Bar convenes meeting on ICC
written by Nik Elin Nik Abd Rashid, Wednesday, February 14 2007 12:04 pm
Dear Zainur,
UNCLE SAM NOT A SIGNATORY
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Wednesday, February 14 2007 08:18 pm
If a numerical majority of State Parties sign and ratify this international law statute, then it becomes the norm, derogation from which is not allowed. However, modification by a subsequent nporm of geneeral international law have the same character is allowed.
US BIAs written by Shanmuga Kanesalingam, Thursday, February 15 2007 12:46 pm
Quite right, Steven. The US is not a signatory. Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|








KUALA LUMPUR: On February 8 the Malaysian Bar convened a meeting to discuss the establishment
of the Malaysian Coalition for an International Criminal Court (ICC). About
a dozen NGOs and political parties attended this meeting chaired by Ambiga
Sreenevasan, vice-president of the Malaysian Bar.


















You can join a moderated mailing list on latest developments on the ICC by emailing mailto:icc-info-subscribe@yahoogroups.com