• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Press Statements
  • Press Statements
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
  • Go back to list
Press Release: Use of Emergency Ordinance and Internal Security Act proves Government lacks commitment to the rule of law 1 Jun 2011 2:52 pm

The Malaysian Bar remains opposed to the use of the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 (“EO”) and the Internal Security Act 1960 (“ISA”) by the police as a means of apprehending those suspected of having committed criminal offences.

In recent days, the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs has signed orders restricting the residence of three youths allegedly involved in motorcycle thefts.  Muhamad Arif Abu Samah, 20, has been placed under restricted residence in Mersing, Johor pursuant to the EO.  Two brothers – Mohamed Ramadan Mohamed Ali, 22, and Mohamad Rafe, 20 – were placed under restricted residence pursuant to the EO in Chemor, Pahang and Kulim, Kedah respectively.  All three are suspects involved in alleged motorcycle thefts in the district of Gombak, Selangor.

In addition, it was reported in the press earlier this week that the police have also detained three persons in Sabah for alleged involvement in human trafficking.

These detentions under the EO and ISA raise serious questions, such as why action has not been taken under the Penal Code and the Anti–Trafficking in Persons and Anti–Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007.  Instead, the authorities have chosen to rely on preventive detention legislation that is devoid of any proper regard and safeguards for human rights.  The EO and the ISA are convenient tools for the police, as their use means that no evidence need be produced in a court of law to support the police’s allegations.  This entirely sidesteps adherence to the due process of the law. 

Proper police investigations should be conducted to prove the necessary ingredients of an offence. What is worse is that incompetence and inadequacies in police investigations may be covered up, including false arrests and instances of corruption, by recourse to the EO and the ISA.  This is because there is no transparency or accountability in the use of these laws.

The EO and ISA, together with other preventive detention legislation, are archaic laws whose “use by” date is well past.  Their continued use is repugnant to civil society.  No less a person than the Prime Minister himself announced that preventive detention legislation would be reviewed, in order to make them more “human rights friendly”, in a speech given in April 2009.  More than two years on, we have yet to see anything forthcoming.

The Malaysian Bar calls on the government to declare its respect for the due process of the law and to charge those recently detained in open court, and disclose the evidence against them so that they may receive a full and fair hearing.  Otherwise the police should release them. 

The government must display, through action, its commitment to the rule of law.
 
Lim Chee Wee
President
Malaysian Bar

1 June 2011 

© Copyright Reserved 2022. Bar Council Malaysia.
 

I'm a