• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • MyBar Pro Bono Hub
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Press Statements
  • Press Statements
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Go back to list
Press Release | Third-Party Funding, Arbitral Integrity and Lessons from Recent International Arbitration Developments 13 Jan 2026 9:35 am

The Malaysian Bar recognises that third-party funding has become an established feature of modern international arbitration.  When properly regulated, it can enhance access to justice, allow meritorious claims to be pursued despite financial constraints and strengthen confidence in arbitration as a credible and feasible dispute resolution mechanism.

The Parliament’s enactment of the Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2024, which came into force on 1 January 2026, reflects a conscious policy choice to legitimise third-party funding in arbitration while embedding safeguards intended to preserve ethical standards, procedural fairness and the integrity of the arbitral process.  The statutory abolition of the common law rule against maintenance and champerty for arbitration, coupled with mandatory disclosure obligations and the introduction of a code of practice for third-party funding, demonstrates a balanced approach that accepts funding as a reality but subjects it to transparency and oversight.

Recent international arbitration developments, including high-profile investor-state disputes, have prompted public debate on whether third-party funding encourages speculative or abusive claims.  The Malaysian Bar is of the view that such cases do not establish that funding itself is unethical or improper.  Rather, they highlight the risks that arise where funding operates in an environment that lacks clear disclosure requirements, effective tribunal oversight or early scrutiny of jurisdictional and procedural issues.

Third-party funding does not create weak claims.  It can, however, expand the scope of disputes and prolong proceedings if underlying jurisdictional or procedural weaknesses are not identified and addressed promptly.  The ethical concern, therefore, lies not in the existence of funding, but in the absence of robust institutional checks to ensure independence of arbitral decision-making, manage conflicts of interest, and prevent undue influence over the conduct of proceedings.

The Malaysian framework addresses these concerns directly.  Mandatory disclosure of the existence and identity of funders promotes transparency, allowing arbitrators to assess potential conflicts at an early stage.  The code of practice provides a structured mechanism to regulate funder conduct, including issues of capital adequacy and control over proceedings.  It does so while preserving flexibility for tribunals to respond proportionately through procedural directions, including orders for security for costs, adverse costs orders, or other appropriate procedural sanctions, in instances of non-compliance.  The new framework also reinforces the principle that funders must not direct the conduct of the arbitration, including decisions on strategy, evidence or settlement, and that counsel’s professional duties remain owed exclusively to the client and the tribunal.

The Malaysian Bar emphasises that arbitration derives its legitimacy from fairness, neutrality and respect for the rule of law.  Third-party funding must operate within these boundaries.  When used responsibly and regulated effectively, it supports access to justice and reinforces confidence in arbitration.  However, when used without transparency or accountability, it risks undermining the very system it seeks to support.

The Malaysian Bar recognises that the effectiveness of this framework will ultimately depend on consistent enforcement, judicial support and principled application by arbitral tribunals.  Ongoing vigilance by all stakeholders will therefore be essential to ensure that the objectives of transparency, fairness and integrity are realised in practice.

The Malaysian Bar, therefore, supports the new statutory framework governing third-party funding in arbitration and calls on all stakeholders, including counsel, funders, arbitrators and institutions, to uphold both the letter and the spirit of the law.  Ethical funding, grounded in transparency and disciplined by oversight, is not a threat to arbitration.  It is a tool that must be handled with care, integrity, and responsibility.

Mohamad Ezri b Abdul Wahab
President
Malaysian Bar

13 January 2026

© Copyright Reserved 2026. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.

Type “Hi” to begin your chat.

Do not share confidential or sensitive information. Verify any AI-generated content independently.

Disclaimer

This pilot chatbot service only provides information for general reference. The information provided does not constitute legal or professional advice. By continuing, you acknowledge that your input will be processed by AI, and you understand that AI-generated information may be inaccurate or incomplete and should be independently verified. Do not disclose confidential or sensitive information.

The Malaysian Bar is not liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any of the information provided. By using this service, you accept the applicable Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a