• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • MyBar Pro Bono Hub
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Legal and General News
  • Legal News
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Go back to list
Stakeholders slam bill to check police conduct as watered down, lame 27 Aug 2020 8:43 am

@ Free Malaysia Today (used by permission)
by Imran Ariff
 
PETALING JAYA: Stakeholders have condemned the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) Bill tabled in Parliament yesterday, which replaces the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill proposed by the former government.
 
M Ramachelvam, chairman of the Bar Council task force for the IPCMC, called the bill “deeply flawed”, and said Parliament “should not proceed” with its passing.
 
“It has watered down the powers that were given under the previous bill,” he said.
 
Ramachelvam took issue with the bill’s removal of investigative and preventative powers that were in the IPCMC, and said it looked as though the commission now being proposed would only be able to take action when instances of misconduct were referred to it.
 
He also said previous restrictions on current and former members of the police force being part of the commission had been removed in the IPCC.
 
“Potentially, a serving or retired member of the police force could be on the commission, which impinges on its independence and impartiality,” he said.
 
Sevan Doraisamy, executive director of rights group Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram), said they were “appalled” by the bill, and called it “merely a bid to sidestep the consultation and recommendations made by the parliamentary select committee (which had studied the IPCMC).”
 
He called it an example of the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government “wasting public resources, funds and time,” and added that the bill had “fatal flaws that would undermine the functions of IPCMC/IPCC and render it completely irrelevant and be a waste of public funds”.
 
These include provisions allowing police officers to refuse to answer to the commission if it could incriminate other officers, and the refusal to disclose information on national security grounds.
 
The bill also requires the commission to give early notice before visiting detention centres, which has raised eyebrows as questions have been raised about the treatment of detainees.
 
Sevan called on the government to adopt the recommendations made by the parliamentary select committee (PSC) as the current iteration was “doomed to failure” and “will only further tarnish the reputation of the police force and affirm public mistrust of the police force”.
 
Ramachelvam agreed, and said the government should withdraw the bill and send it back to a PSC as well as get feedback from the various stakeholders.
 
“The bill in its current form won’t bring about the necessary reform in the Malaysian police force,” he said.

© Copyright Reserved 2026. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a