• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
    • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Peer Support Network
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Benefits
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms | Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful Forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
    • Malaysian Bar Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Payments
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • News
  • Legal and General News
  • General News
News
Press Statements
  • Press Statements
Speeches
  • Speeches
Bar News
  • Notices
  • News
AGMs and EGMs
  • Resolutions
In Memoriam
  • In Memoriam
Legal and General News
  • General News
  • Members' Opinions
  • Legal News
Court Judgments
  • Judgments
Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Highlights from the Appellate Courts
  • Go back to list
Spotlight: Long wait, hefty fees the bane in dealing with ARB 25 Apr 2008 12:00 am

©New Straits Times (Used by permission)
by Lee Siew Lian

AMANAH Raya Bhd has flourished since it was corporatised in 1995. Now it charges among the highest fees in the market for what was once a public service of last resort, writes LEE SIEW LIAN.

In recent years, thousands of Malaysians have named Amanah Raya Bhd their executor, a personal representative to carry out their last will and testament after they die.

Few may realise ARB's fees could take a substantial chunk out of what they leave their rightful heirs.

Richard Mah* died last year, leaving the Taiping family home to his middle–aged sons Henry* and George*. Because he appointed ARB as executor, they will have to pay between RM14,000 and RM20,000 in fees.

That's between two and three per cent of the house's value of RM600,000.

"I don't mind paying professional fees," said Henry, "but I'm very unhappy about the amount. I've done my homework, and I know this is a lot to pay."

Had Mah died without a will, his sons could have got everything done at the Small Estates Office for RM30. Lawyers polled by the New Straits Times said they charge between one and 1.5 per cent for similar cases.

What used to be a public service, especially for lower–income groups, has become a lucrative business. Originally Malaysia's Public Trustee, its role was to cut the cost of administering estates of small value. Money saved on legal and court fees could go to beneficiaries instead.

(Small estates were worth under RM600,000 until earlier this year, when the value was raised to RM2 million.)

"Our 'rack rates' are uncompetitive," acknowledged Rafie Omar, who leads ARB Legacy Services, the trustee company's will–writing and estate management subsidiary.

The Mahs should be entitled to ask for a discount because their case is not contentious, he said. However, he declined to say how much, or to guarantee a reduction in fees.

"The decision rests solely with ARB group managing director Datuk Ahmad Rodzi Pawanteh. In most cases, he has given good discounts."

Still, this discretionary reduction does not appear to be standard practice, and is not mentioned in available ARB literature.

Since it was corporatised in 1995, ARB has branded itself the country's leading wills writer, and executor of choice.

Highly visible through a long–running marketing campaign, it has written more wills in the last two weeks than for the whole of 2005. It now has 34,000–plus wills in its custody, a far cry from 114 in 2002.

Revenues exceeded RM10 million last year from administering estates, up about two–thirds from 2001. Most of these estates are small, with an average value of under RM8,000 in 2002.

It has easily broken open what used to be the exclusive domain of solicitors, because the legal profession is restricted in adverti–sing services and fees, said lawyers.

"It's something the Bar Council should have handled years ago," said a probate lawyer, partner at one of Malaysia's top five firms.

She said she would have charged the Mahs much less than ARB, perhaps RM6,000 depending on the complexity of the case. Her firm sometimes handles even very small estates for free as a public service, she said.

"The Public Trustee was supposed to be a temporary caretaker and a fall–back body that people could turn to. ARB as a corporation has defeated its original purpose."

Ipoh lawyer Arthur Yeong pointed out lawyers' charges usually cover obtaining probate, and not for performing executors' duties in tracing and overseeing estates. Executors are legally entitled to fees, which family members often don't claim to save the estate money.

That's why Yeong usually advises clients with smaller estates and simple bequests to appoint spouses or grown–up children. "That may not be what ARB is doing."

ARB's sales pitch is usually to tell clients that family and friends often decline or renounce appointments, or are unable or unwilling to shoulder the heavy burden.

"We do advise them that banks and the Land Office are more than willing to deal with a statutory corporation like us," Rafie said.

He acknowledged there was some conflict of interest, but executors' fees are what make the legacy business profitable. Probate fees alone are not lucrative enough, he said.

ARB must compete to remain commercially viable, and to earn returns for its shareholder, he said. It is wholly owned by the Minister of Finance Inc.

Despite its hefty fees, however, ARB's service appears unsatisfactory. Beneficiaries said they do much of the running around themselves, tracing assets and documents from banks and other bodies. Delays are common and decisions hard to come by, said lawyers and beneficiaries.

In one case, it took more than two years to distribute RM450,000 in a single intestate bank account, said lawyer Yeong. ARB deducted fees of about RM13,200 – almost three per cent.

The substantial fee might have been worth it had the matter been settled fast. After all, ARB is empowered to act directly for small estates. While lawyers must apply to court, ARB can issue the necessary declarations itself.

Yeong said he sent them reminders almost every month during that time. "I rarely got a reply."

Daphne Nasir is frustrated too. When her husband died three years ago, he had not named a nominee for his Employees Provident Fund account and had no will.

Forced to borrow money for rent and food for her young children, she sorted through his affairs with much difficulty. Last year she finally obtained a distribution order and faraid certificate from the syariah court.

Her syariah lawyer told her the next step was to go to ARB for the distribution. But it was a mistake: Daphne should simply have gone straight to EPF.

EPF would have released the money by now, agreed Rafie, who had also handled intestacy in ARB until 2006.

The intestacy division is now most likely treating it as a new case, and has started the process from scratch, he added.

Daphne's lawyer was under a false impression that ARB is the sole authority for distributing small estates, in particular Muslim ones. It is a widely held belief especially among staff of banks and other bodies, he said.

And, he acknowledged, many beneficiaries are referred to ARB under this notion, without knowing they have cheaper alternatives.

"But surely, as a going concern, we cannot be expected to just turn away business."

(* Names have been changed.)

© Copyright Reserved 2025. Malaysian Bar.
Wisma Badan Peguam Malaysia, 2 Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Terms and Conditions.
 

I'm a

 
 
 
 
 

I'm a