• Home
  • News
    • Press Statements
    • Speeches
    • Bar News
    • AGMs and EGMs
    • In Memoriam
    • Legal and General News
    • Court Judgments
  • Members
    • Circulars
    • Sijil Annual and Payments
    • Practice Management
    • Professional Development
    • Opportunities for Practice
    • Mentor-Mentee Programmes
    • Benefits
    • Laws, BC Rulings and Practice Directions
    • Resources
    • Become a Member
  • Find
    • Legal Directories
    • BC Legal Aid Centres
    • State Bar Committees
    • Law Firms Areas of Practice
    • Jobs
    • Useful forms
  • About Us
    • Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
    • President's Corner
    • Committees
    • Previous Committees
    • Contacts
    • Advertising
  • Public
    • Complaints
    • Legal Aid
    • Notices
    • Compensation Fund
  • Search
  • Login
Search for

New login method: If first-time login, the password is your NRIC No. Call 20502191 for help.

 
Lost your password? Remember Me

 
No User ID/Password for firm? Click here for more information. Forgot Firm Username/Password?

Set a new password

If you have lost your password, you must set a new password. To begin this process, please key in your 12-digit NRIC No. below.

Forgot Firm Username/ Password?

Please enter name of firm or registered email address, indicate whether you want to retrieve your firm's username or password, and click "Submit".

Username Password
 
Access to Member Portal

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Resume Practice Request

Please key in your membership number, and click "GO"

BC
Newly-Called Request

Please key in your pupil code, and click "Submit"

Pupil Code

Change Password


Please enter your Password and Confirm Password then click on the Change Password button.
You will receive a new password shortly. Use this new password to access the site.

Password:
Confirm Password:
 
Change Password


Shortcut
  • Legal Directory
  • Find a Job
  • CPD
  • Online Shop
  • Complaints
  • Committees

Search the site

  • Search Me
Member Login
  • BC Online Facilities
  • Login Type 2
  • Login Type 3
  • Login Type 4
  • About Us
  • President's Corner
  • Press Statements
About Us
Malaysian Bar and Bar Council
  • About Us
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Elections
President's Corner
  • Roll of Presidents
  • Press Statements
Committees
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Amendments to the LPA
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Benchmarking Law Firms
  • Ad Hoc Committee On Conditional Fee Rules Re Personal Injuries
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Personal Data Protection
  • Ad Hoc Committee On The Common Bar Course
  • Advocacy Training Committee
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • Child Rights
  • Civil Law
  • Committee On Orang Asli Rights
  • Constitutional Law Committee
  • Conveyancing Practice
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Court Liaison
  • Criminal Law
  • Environment and Climate Change
  • Family Law
  • Finance
  • Human Rights
  • Industrial and Employment Law
  • Information Technology and Cyberlaws
  • Innovation and Future of Law Committee
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2014
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2016
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2018
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2020
  • Islamic Finance
  • Law Reform and Special Areas
  • LawCare
  • Legal Profession
  • Migrants, Refugees and Immigration Affairs Committee
  • Motor Insurance Review Committee
  • National Legal Aid
  • National Young Lawyers
  • Professional Indemnity Insurance
  • Professional Standards and Development
  • Shipping & Admiralty Law
  • Small Firms
  • Solicitors' Remuneration Enforcement Committee
  • Sports
  • Syariah Law
  • Task Force on Combined Rules Of Court
  • Task Force on Independent Police Complaints & Misconduct Commission (IPCMC)
  • Task Force to Review the Compendium of Personal Injury Awards
  • Trade In Legal Services (formerly known as GATS)
  • Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan Steering Committee
Previous Committees
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Anti Money Laundering
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Commission
  • Ad Hoc Committee On National Legal Aid Foundation
  • Ad Hoc Committee on Rules and Regulations
  • Arbitration & Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration Subcommittee
  • Construction Law Committee (formerly known as Subcommittee on Construction Law)
  • Gender Issues & Equal Opportunities (2005-2007)
  • International Malaysia Law Conference 2012
  • LawCare Fund Management
  • Library
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2007
  • Malaysian Law Conference Organising Committee 2010
  • No-Fault Liability Scheme
  • Practice Management Support Committee
  • Publications
  • Safer Malaysia
  • Standing Committee for the Promotion of Best Practices by Detaining Authorities (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Court Rules (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee on Eliminating Discrimination (2005-2007)
  • Standing Committee to Review LPA 1976
  • Study Loan
Contacts
  • Web Administrator
  • Complaints
  • Legal Aid Centres
  • State Bar Committees
  • Bar Council Secretariat
  • Bar Council Members
  • Bar Council
Advertising
  • Advertise with Bar Council
  • Go back to list
Press Comment | Tertiary Legal Institutions Should Enhance the Quality of Legal Training for Students 24 Nov 2020 9:03 pm

The Malaysian Bar refers to a letter published in Malaysiakini recently, titled “Law graduates unprepared for pupillage?”1 

Just as legal skills evolve with the course of time, so too should its education and training. Traditional law schools must therefore provide a legal education that consists of crucial skills, such as creative solutions to solving legal problems, and a focus on both academic and practical training. 

While the Malaysian Bar appreciates that a thorough and detailed knowledge of such practical skills can only be acquired during pupillage or while practising as lawyers, we are nevertheless of the view that the learning and understanding of such basic concepts must be inculcated during the legal education of law students during their tertiary education. Law school curricula must be tailored in such a way, to avoid merely regurgitating legal principles in examinations without actually understanding their practical applications. 

However, it is neither true nor fair to simply assume that all public and private universities are producing below par law graduates.  There are many law graduates who have demonstrated that they possess impeccable knowledge during their pupillage period.  There are also law schools that have been proactive and demonstrated tremendous interest through their participation with stakeholders in the profession, such as the Bar Council, in guiding and mentoring their students.  This sort of initiative is needed to produce and maintain a high standard of law graduates.

The Malaysian Bar also stresses that law graduates seeking pupillage should be aware of what awaits them as pupils and take note of the job requirements as pupils, besides being cognisant of the practice areas and the partners of the firms that they are seeking to join.  Many experienced lawyers prefer pupillage applications that are tailored to their firms or specific areas of practice, instead of receiving template emails from law graduates that are sent to hundreds of firms.  Such a blasé attitude would not likely yield a positive response from potential pupil masters. 

Law schools might want to consider expanding their role by assisting students to get into suitable law firms — while an added responsibility for the law school, it is one that would provide students with a meaningful learning experience that suits their areas of interest for their pupillage.  If law schools take on this additional responsibility, it is strongly advisable for them to establish strong rapport with law firms.  This move would enhance and further equip students with the requisite skills when they enter the job market.  

It is a misconception that senior law practitioners are not willing and able to devote their time to train pupils.  Senior lawyers work under time constraints, and a nine-month pupillage is a short period of time.  It may not be feasible to teach all the necessary basic skills to pupils that should have been acquired even prior to pupillage.  The pupillage period is designed to hone and sharpen the existing legal skills acquired during pupils’ education in law schools. 

It is therefore essential that a pupil’s legal education be fully utilised to prepare him/her for life as a practitioner.  Law schools must satisfy both the academic needs and the minimum-skill requirements needed for a pupil to become a lawyer.  Law faculties must take the approach to be industry-driven to source for relevant experts in various practice areas, to contribute to pupils’ education.

Lastly, despite the impressive academic qualifications of the law schools’ teaching staff, it is not sufficient to ensure that law students receive the requisite training they need.  Lecturers must possess both substantive and procedural knowledge, as well as expertise, in the respective subjects that they are teaching, and must be able to stimulate effective delivery in the classroom in order to impart knowledge effectively.  The focus should not be purely on the law students’ academic qualifications.  Law students must receive the necessary practical training even before entering into the legal profession, so that they can thrive.

 

Salim Bashir
President
Malaysian Bar

24 November 2020 


1 “Law graduates unprepared for pupillage?” Malaysiakini, 20 November 2020.  

© Copyright Reserved 2021. Bar Council Malaysia.