 Text of President Bush's speech Wednesday on the economic crisis and a
financial rescue plan, as transcribed by CQ Transcriptions:
Good evening. This is an extraordinary period for America's economy.
Over the past few weeks, many Americans have felt anxiety about their finances
and their future. I understand their worry and their frustration.
We've seen triple-digit swings in the stock market. Major financial institutions
have teetered on the edge of collapse, and some have failed. As uncertainty has
grown, many banks have restricted lending, credit markets have frozen, and
families and businesses have found it harder to borrow money.
We're in the midst of a serious financial crisis, and the federal government is
responding with decisive action.
We boosted confidence in money market mutual funds and acted to prevent major
investors from intentionally driving down stocks for their own personal gain.
Most importantly, my administration is working with Congress to address the root
cause behind much of the instability in our markets.
Financial assets related to home mortgages have lost value during the house
decline, and the banks holding these assets have restricted credit. As a result,
our entire economy is in danger.
So I propose that the federal government reduce the risk posed by these troubled
assets and supply urgently needed money so banks and other financial
institutions can avoid collapse and resume lending.
This rescue effort is not aimed at preserving any individual company or
industry. It is aimed at preserving America's overall economy.
It will help American consumers and businesses get credit to meet their daily
needs and create jobs. And it will help send a signal to markets around the
world that America's financial system is back on track.
I know many Americans have questions tonight: How did we reach this point in our
economy? How will the solution I propose work? And what does this mean for your
financial future?
These are good questions, and they deserve clear answers.
First, how did our economy reach this point? Well, most economists agree that
the problems we're witnessing today developed over a long period of time. For
more than a decade, a massive amount of money flowed into the United States from
investors abroad because our country is an attractive and secure place to do
business.
This large influx of money to U.S. banks and financial institutions, along with
low interest rates, made it easier for Americans to get credit. These
developments allowed more families to borrow money for cars, and homes, and
college tuition, some for the first time. They allowed more entrepreneurs to get
loans to start new businesses and create jobs.
Unfortunately, there were also some serious negative consequences, particularly
in the housing market. Easy credit, combined with the faulty assumption that
home values would continue to rise, led to excesses and bad decisions.
Many mortgage lenders approved loans for borrowers without carefully examining
their ability to pay. Many borrowers took out loans larger than they could
afford, assuming that they could sell or refinance their homes at a higher price
later on.
Optimism about housing values also led to a boom in home construction.
Eventually, the number of new houses exceeded the number of people willing to
buy them. And with supply exceeding demand, housing prices fell, and this
created a problem.
Borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages, who had been planning to sell or
refinance their homes at a higher price, were stuck with homes worth less than
expected, along with mortgage payments they could not afford.
As a result, many mortgage-holders began to default. These widespread defaults
had effects far beyond the housing market.
See, in today's mortgage industry, home loans are often packaged together and
converted into financial products called mortgage-backed securities. These
securities were sold to investors around the world.
Many investors assumed these securities were trustworthy and asked few questions
about their actual value. Two of the leading purchasers of mortgage-backed
securities were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were
guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums
of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial
system at risk.
The decline in the housing market set off a domino effect across our economy.
When home values declined, borrowers defaulted on their mortgages, and investors
holding mortgage-backed securities began to incur serious losses.
Before long, these securities became so unreliable that they were not being
bought or sold. Investment banks, such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers,
found themselves saddled with large amounts of assets they could not sell. They
ran out of money needed to meet their immediate obligations, and they faced
imminent collapse.
Other banks found themselves in severe financial trouble. These banks began
holding on to their money, and lending dried up, and the gears of the American
financial system began grinding to a halt.
With the situation becoming more precarious by the day, I faced a choice, to
step in with dramatic government action or to stand back and allow the
irresponsible actions of some to undermine the financial security of all.
I'm a strong believer in free enterprise, so my natural instinct is to oppose
government intervention. I believe companies that make bad decisions should be
allowed to go out of business.
Under normal circumstances, I would have followed this course. But these are not
normal circumstances. The market is not functioning properly. There has been a
widespread loss of confidence, and major sectors of America's financial system
are at risk of shutting down.
The government's top economic experts warn that, without immediate action by
Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario
would unfold.
More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would
drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The
value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically.
And if you own a business or a farm, you would find it harder and more expensive
to get credit. More businesses would close their doors, and millions of
Americans could lose their jobs.
Even if you have good credit history, it would be more difficult for you to get
the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. And,
ultimately, our country could experience a long and painful recession.
Fellow citizens, we must not let this happen. I appreciate the work of leaders
from both parties in both houses of Congress to address this problem and to make
improvements to the proposal my administration sent to them.
There is a spirit of cooperation between Democrats and Republicans and between
Congress and this administration. In that spirit, I've invited Senators McCain
and Obama to join congressional leaders of both parties at the White House
tomorrow to help speed our discussions toward a bipartisan bill.
I know that an economic rescue package will present a tough vote for many
members of Congress. It is difficult to pass a bill that commits so much of the
taxpayers' hard-earned money.
I also understand the frustration of responsible Americans who pay their
mortgages on time, file their tax returns every April 15th, and are reluctant to
pay the cost of excesses on Wall Street.
But given the situation we are facing, not passing a bill now would cost these
Americans much more later.
Many Americans are asking, how would a rescue plan work? After much discussion,
there's now widespread agreement on the principles such a plan would include.
It would remove the risk posed by the troubled assets, including mortgage-backed
securities, now clogging the financial system. This would free banks to resume
the flow of credit to American families and businesses.
Any rescue plan should also be designed to ensure that taxpayers are protected.
It should welcome the participation of financial institutions, large and small.
It should make certain that failed executives do not receive a windfall from
your tax dollars.
It should establish a bipartisan board to oversee the plan's implementation, and
it should be enacted as soon as possible.
In close consultation with Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Federal Reserve
Chairman Ben Bernanke, and SEC Chairman Chris Cox, I announced a plan on Friday.
First, the plan is big enough to solve a serious problem. Under our proposal,
the federal government would put up to $700 billion taxpayer dollars on the line
to purchase troubled assets that are clogging the financial system.
In the short term, this will free up banks to resume the flow of credit to
American families and businesses, and this will help our economy grow.
Second, as markets have lost confidence in mortgage-backed securities, their
prices have dropped sharply, yet the value of many of these assets will likely
be higher than their current price, because the vast majority of Americans will
ultimately pay off their mortgages.
The government is the one institution with the patience and resources to buy
these assets at their current low prices and hold them until markets return to
normal.
And when that happens, money will flow back to the Treasury as these assets are
sold, and we expect that much, if not all, of the tax dollars we invest will be
paid back.
The final question is, what does this mean for your economic future? Well, the
primary steps — purpose of the steps I've outlined tonight is to safeguard the
financial security of American workers, and families, and small businesses. The
federal government also continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting
your money.
The Treasury Department recently offered government insurance for money market
mutual funds. And through the FDIC, every savings account, checking account, and
certificate of deposit is insured by the federal government for up to $100,000.
The FDIC has been in existence for 75 years, and no one has ever lost a penny on
an insured deposit, and this will not change.
Once this crisis is resolved, there will be time to update our financial
regulatory structures. Our 21st-century global economy remains regulated largely
by outdated 20th-century laws.
Recently, we've seen how one company can grow so large that its failure
jeopardizes the entire financial system.
Earlier this year, Secretary Paulson proposed a blueprint that would modernize
our financial regulations. For example, the Federal Reserve would be authorized
to take a closer look at the operations of companies across the financial
spectrum and ensure that their practices do not threaten overall financial
stability.
There are other good ideas, and members of Congress should consider them. As
they do, they must ensure that efforts to regulate Wall Street do not end up
hampering our economy's ability to grow.
In the long run, Americans have good reason to be confident in our economic
strength. Despite corrections in the marketplace and instances of abuse,
democratic capitalism is the best system ever devised.
It has unleashed the talents and the productivity and entrepreneurial spirit of
our citizens. It has made this country the best place in the world to invest and
do business. And it gives our economy the flexibility and resilience to absorb
shocks, adjust, and bounce back.
Our economy is facing a moment of great challenge, but we've overcome tough
challenges before, and we will overcome this one.
I know that Americans sometimes get discouraged by the tone in Washington and
the seemingly endless partisan struggles, yet history has shown that, in times
of real trial, elected officials rise to the occasion.
And together we will show the world once again what kind of country America is:
a nation that tackles problems head on, where leaders come together to meet
great tests, and where people of every background can work hard, develop their
talents, and realize their dreams.
Thank you for listening. May God bless you.
|
I have said all the time that we live in interesting times.
This is the first time in the entire history of the world where the global leader is a technically bankrupt nation. All the time, global leaders are the richest in their time.
We are also going to witness for the first time in the entire history of the world that the global leader has a smaller economy. Maybe in the next 10 or 15 years.
Today, the US of A still commands the largest economy. In the next 10 or 15 years, it will be eclipsed by China ... provided that Washington does not do an Iraq on the growing economic power.
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng