HomeNewsPress Statements Press Release: Justice is not measured by speed or statistics but by a full and fair hearing and a reasoned decision
Press Release: Justice is not measured by speed or statistics but by a full and fair hearing and a reasoned decision
Monday, 31 January 2011 04:39pm
The decisions of the Magistrate in the private summons case involving Ryan Chong Yiing Yih and Darren Choy Khin Ming, to proceed with the hearing on 28 Jan 2011 although counsel for the accused was clearly ill, and when counsel was taken to the hospital, to proceed to fix further hearing dates without consulting the free dates of the ailing counsel, were uncalled for.
Such decisions are clearly contrary to the principle of a full and fair hearing, and natural justice.
This was not the first occasion the Magistrate ignored the principle of right to counsel. On a previous occasion, he brought forward the originally fixed trial dates of March 2011 to early January without considering the availability of counsel and witness.
Such a pattern of behaviour smacks of blind obsession with speedy justice without any heart or regard to justice to the parties.
The right to a full and fair trial must by necessity include the litigant or accused’s right to counsel of choice, and therefore, the fixing of a hearing date must take into consideration the availability of counsel on the proposed date.
It is in recognition of this simple principle that the Chief Justice, on behalf of the Judiciary, had agreed in various discussions with the Bar, that, with regard to the issue of hearing dates and postponements:
(a) hearing dates for cases, which have already been fixed by the court with the agreement of counsel, should not be brought forward without the consent of the parties involved;
(b) in the exceptional circumstance where the court intends to change a hearing date that has been fixed, lawyers must be informed in writing at least one month in advance and the change of date can only be done with the consent of all parties; and
(c) Judges must exercise their discretion in considering applications for adjournments.
The Malaysian Bar regrets that it has to state the obvious, that Judges are reminded that justice is to be dispensed through a full and fair hearing, and not speed and quantity of cases disposed of.
nothing new but getting worse written by Karamjit Singh a/l Harbhajan Singh,
Monday, January 31 2011 05:14 pm
I have also heard instances where adjourments were not granted when a preagnent women attended court with sore eyes and an MC from the Tun Hussein Onn Eye clinic and adjournment was not granted.
The same is no applicable to the judicial officers who are entitled to take emergency leave and even sick leave. Why the double standards?
KPI overrides RULES and ACT OF Parliament written by Majdah Binti Muda,
Tuesday, February 01 2011 10:41 pm
The way I look at the current scenario is to the drain both RHC 1980 and SCR 1980...Take heed to current KPI!
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
2012 Bar Council Subscription Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
2012 Hotel Corporate Rates Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
Bar Council Bookshop Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012) Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Talk on Summary Judgement (25 May 2012) Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, this talk will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 25 May 2012 (Friday). The talk will be conducted by Ramesh Supramanian. Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on Tax Issues in Financial Transactions (25 May 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, this seminar, featuring S Saravana Kumar, will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 25 May 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Dialogue with Criminal Law Practitioners (26 May 2012) Organised by Bar Council, this dialogue will take place at 10:00 am to 12:00 pm, at the Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 26 May 2012 (Saturday). Click on the link above for more details.
Conference on Competition Law (31 May 2012) Organised by Bar Council with the support of LexisNexis, this conference will take place at 8:30 am to 4:00 pm, at Renaissance Kuala Lumpur Hotel, on 31 May 2012 (Thursday). For more details or to register, please contact Vilashini Vijayan (03-2050 2095; vila@malaysianbar.org.my). Click on the link above for more details.
Talk on What Clients Want (7 June 2012) Organised by the KL Bar Practitioners' Affairs Committee, the talk, presented by Ong Eu Jin, will take place at 5:00 pm, at the KL Bar Auditorium, on 7 June 2012 (Thursday). Click on the link above for more details.
4th LAWASIA Family Law Conference, Penang (13 and 14 July 2012) Supported by Penang Bar Committee and the Malaysian Bar, this conference, themed “The New Global Family: Emerging Trends and Challenges to Family Practice”, will take place at Traders Hotel, Penang, on 13 and 14 July 2012 (Friday and Saturday). Click on the link above for more details.
News 
The decisions of the Magistrate in the private summons case involving Ryan Chong Yiing Yih and Darren Choy Khin Ming, to proceed with the hearing on 28 Jan 2011 although counsel for the accused was clearly ill, and when counsel was taken to the hospital, to proceed to fix further hearing dates without consulting the free dates of the ailing counsel, were uncalled for.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Circular No 109/2012: Be a Part of the Bar Council Constitutional Law Committee
I have also heard instances where adjourments were not granted when a preagnent women attended court with sore eyes and an MC from the Tun Hussein Onn Eye clinic and adjournment was not granted.
The same is no applicable to the judicial officers who are entitled to take emergency leave and even sick leave. Why the double standards?