Recently, the subject of judicial immunity has received a measure of public attention and discussion. A perception has arisen in the public domain that Judges may be sued or taken to court for what they do or say in the performance of their duty, if it could be shown that there was an absence of good faith.
As the issue is inextricably intertwined with the principle of judicial independence, it is important for the public to understand and appreciate the concept and significance of judicial immunity.
Judicial immunity of judges is granted both at common law and, in Malaysia, by Section 14 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 which reflects the age-old common law principle that persons exercising judicial functions are exempt from all civil liability of any kind, in respect of anything done or said by them in their judicial capacity.
Thus, and as an illustration, if a judge makes a comment, inference, or finding of fact in the course of judgment, he or she is accorded the protection of judicial immunity, and cannot be sued in any court. This protection applies even where the judge has acted outside the ambit of his jurisdiction, so long as at the time of so acting the judge himself (whether rightly or erroneously) believed that he had the jurisdiction to do what he did.
The existence of judicial immunity is rooted in sound and solid grounds of public policy. If judges do not enjoy such immunity, and if they can be taken to court for what is alleged to be a wrong finding, comment or decision, then no judge will be able to carry out his or her judicial function free from fear. The fabric of the independent exercise of judicial decision making will wholly disintegrate.
Any error alleged to have been made by a judge must be addressed by way of the appeal process, and not by seeking to establish liability on the part of the judge.
However, it is also important to realise that judicial immunity does not mean that the decisions and conduct of judges may not be commented upon or criticised. The contrary is in fact the case, in any democratic society that cherishes accountability. Judges’ decisions and conduct may properly be the subject matter of discussion and criticism, unless it is done with malice, or as a deliberate attempt to undermine the administration of justice.
BEACON OF SANITY written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng,
Friday, March 17 2006 07:57 am
This is an excellent exposition of the law in this particular area.
It therefore requires neither amplification nor clarification.
It stands as a beacon of shining sanity in a sea of stupidity that nearly threatened to invade our beautiful shores recently.
common sense written by Kiang Jau Sang,
Friday, March 17 2006 02:24 pm
Aiyoh... if u ask any kid in the street also, they will tell u that a Jugde is a very big figure la.. No need to pinpoint at any law also... Society at large accepts that a Judge IS a Judge. They are immune from things that they said in court. If someone were to sue a Judge when he's doing his job, then I think that someone is an isolated figure and definitely against public policy. No need law-law, this is COMMON SENSE!
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
2012 Bar Council Subscription Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
2012 Hotel Corporate Rates Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
Bar Council Bookshop Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012) Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Talk on Summary Judgement (25 May 2012) Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, this talk will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 25 May 2012 (Friday). The talk will be conducted by Ramesh Supramanian. Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on Tax Issues in Financial Transactions (25 May 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, this seminar, featuring S Saravana Kumar, will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 25 May 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Dialogue with Criminal Law Practitioners (26 May 2012) Organised by Bar Council, this dialogue will take place at 10:00 am to 12:00 pm, at the Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 26 May 2012 (Saturday). Click on the link above for more details.
Conference on Competition Law (31 May 2012) Organised by Bar Council with the support of LexisNexis, this conference will take place at 8:30 am to 4:00 pm, at Renaissance Kuala Lumpur Hotel, on 31 May 2012 (Thursday). For more details or to register, please contact Vilashini Vijayan (03-2050 2095; vila@malaysianbar.org.my). Click on the link above for more details.
Talk on What Clients Want (7 June 2012) Organised by the KL Bar Practitioners' Affairs Committee, the talk, presented by Ong Eu Jin, will take place at 5:00 pm, at the KL Bar Auditorium, on 7 June 2012 (Thursday). Click on the link above for more details.
4th LAWASIA Family Law Conference, Penang (13 and 14 July 2012) Supported by Penang Bar Committee and the Malaysian Bar, this conference, themed “The New Global Family: Emerging Trends and Challenges to Family Practice”, will take place at Traders Hotel, Penang, on 13 and 14 July 2012 (Friday and Saturday). Click on the link above for more details.
News/Notices 
Recently, the subject of judicial immunity has received a measure of public attention and discussion. A perception has arisen in the public domain that Judges may be sued or taken to court for what they do or say in the performance of their duty, if it could be shown that there was an absence of good faith.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Circular No 109/2012: Be a Part of the Bar Council Constitutional Law Committee
This is an excellent exposition of the law in this particular area.
It therefore requires neither amplification nor clarification.
It stands as a beacon of shining sanity in a sea of stupidity that nearly threatened to invade our beautiful shores recently.