©The Sun (Used by permission)
• Govt went against our advice: Halcrow
IT CAN only be described as poetic justice. In his
pre–retirement days and out of the cabinet and the limelight, Datuk Seri S. Samy
Vellu can take small consolation. When the beams of the MRR2 started to crack
two years ago, with the approval of the cabinet, Halcrow, a British firm of
engineering consultants was appointed to investigate the cause of the cracks,
recommend the remedies and implement them.
All looked well and good. For RM12 million, the much–maligned MRR2 could be repaired and open to traffic with Halcrow’s input. But there was a bitter battle within the Works Ministry. The Public Works Department revolted. They did not want Halcrow as they had someone else in mind. Those in the know talked about a “civil war:” where the civil servants stood up to the political master and rightly so, spoke their mind.
Even a vociferous “it was decided by the cabinet” line was not acceptable to the “experts”. The top guns from PWD went to Putrajaya and met the prime minister, requesting that the cabinet decision be reversed. The asking price by the new firm – Leonard Andre and Partners (LAP) was a mere RM18 million – just RM6 million more and they were providing space–age technology – carbon–fibre to save the cracking pillars.
It did not matter that such technology had never been used in this part of the world but if RM18 million was the final price tag, there would be little to complain. But the price escalated to RM70 million (don’t ask me how and why) and what we got for that mammoth spending was drops of stones from the top of the flyover and a waste of taxpayers’ hard–earned money.
While Samy Vellu may have been vindicated and has every reason to thump his chest and say: “I told you so”, who is going to be accountable to the present state of affairs and the RM70 million bill? On Sunday, before the heavens opened up with more stones, concrete and pieces of carbon–fibre, his successor – Datuk Mohd Zin Mohd came out with guns blazing. “It won’t cost us anything because it is under warranty.” But that is not the issue. How do you compensate for the loss of time, effort and money caused by the closure? What price would you put on the inconvenience caused to thousands of people who use the road daily?
Who is going to be held accountable for this monumental man–made disaster? Everyone would scream and say: “Ask the ACA to investigate!” but this is not corruption, but a wrong decision which has resulted in Malaysians having to suffer for the follies of a few in high places. Don’t expect anyone to commit hara–kiri and don’t even expect any resignations. That’s not our style – it’s Western and by doing so, “we are aping the West.”
So, what can we expect? Can we anticipate someone standing up and saying: “Yes, I take responsibility. It was me who approved the use of carbon–fibre technology which had never been tested or used in Malaysia previously.”
Or would another stand up and say: “We made a wrong decision and we accept total responsibility for that decision.”
No dear readers. Right now, it’s hunting season and the hunt for the scapegoat(s) has just started. There will be many (including innocent parties) caught in the crossfire. But the pain can easily be compensated with lots of purple–coloured security paper.
The prime minister’s words are telling indeed. “When I read the newspaper headlines on my way here, I knew the public would not be happy. In fact, some will be pretty angry knowing that there is damage at the MRR2, even after spending a huge amount of money to repair it earlier.
“This could have been easily avoided if those responsible had ensured that earlier repair works were done properly. If this had been done, there would be no damage and the rakyat would not be fuming,” he told staff of the Prime Minister’s Department on Monday at its monthly gathering.
Yes, Sir, You are spot on, but do the people responsible for this debacle share your views? Do they care that the rakyat would be angry? Do they care that even after spending so much money, we cannot have safe roads? Do they care if they did not ensure remedial works were conducted properly?
No, Sir, They are in a world of their own. They don’t owe the rakyat anything, not even an explanation. They know that the rakyat are paying their salaries, but it makes no difference. For a while, people will talk about MRR2 and the problems. After two weeks, there’ll be another issue which will make headlines and attention is diverted elsewhere. Everything has been well–scripted.
Mr Prime Minister Sir, this is an opportune time for the government to show that it means business and that it will not accept dereliction of duty. This has been said so many times in the recent past by the Chief Secretary to the Government. It has to be done. Those responsible for this mess must be hauled up and held accountable for their actions or inaction. Only this can appease the angry rakyat who expect safe roads to drive on. After all, they pay their taxes which go towards the construction and maintenance of good roads. Anything less will be short–changing the people.
R. Nadeswaran maintains that the top guns in the PWD must be held responsible. He can be reached at citizen–nades@thesundaily.com
Govt went against our advice: Halcrow
by Tan Yi Liang
PETALING JAYA: The solution adopted by the Works Ministry to repair the original cracks that appeared on the Middle Ring Road II (MRR2) flyover in Kepong on Aug 9, 2004 was “not recommended” by Halcrow Consulting Ltd.
“I would like to emphasise that although Halcrow conducted detailed investigations into the original cause of the cracks, the government went against our advice not to use pre–stressed carbon fibre to strengthen the pillar heads because of its limited ductility (capacity to deform before fracture),” Halcrow engineer Roger Buckby said.
He said the company had identified the primary cause of the cracks as “expansion–caused delayed ettringite formation (DEF) due to the formation of sulfate and an alum–based mineral compound called ettringite”.
“Ettringite is a normal product of cement hydration. When you have fairly high temperatures (above 70° C), the formation of ettringite is delayed and incomplete, but if water can penetrate in a later stage through cracks and seepage in the hardened concrete, which it did on the MRR2, it will expand and cause cracks,” said Buckby, who prepared a report for Halcrow which was submitted to the ministry in 2004.
Buckby, who spoke to theSun in a telephone interview and later via email yesterday, stressed that Halcrow was not the company responsible for carrying out the fi nal repairs to the MRR2 pillars which cracked on Sunday, raining concrete fragments on motorists below.
“My company was not appointed to undertake the detailed design and supervision of the remedial work, which I understand was done by Leonhardt & Andra, a German consultant,” he said, adding that the recent incident was possibly due to a rupture of one of the pre–stressed carbon fibre straps.
Buckby however added: “Without close inspection, I cannot give an informed professional opinion on the cause, or on the nature and extent of any remedial work that may be required, but it is clearly of concern.”
It is the third time since the opening of the flyover in stages between 1999 and 2003, that cracks have forced the closure of the 1.7km express link.
It was first closed in August 2004 when cracks were found on 31 of its 33 pillars as a result of the improper anchoring of the crossbeams. The link was repaired and re–opened on Nov 13 the same year.
The MRR2 was closed for a second time in February 2006 and re–opened to traffic after repairs were completed in December the same year.