|
 ©The
Straits Times, Singapore (Used by permission)
by Li Xueying, Political Correspondent
One in three people living here today was born outside
Singapore. These foreign-born folk include new citizens, permanent residents,
foreign workers and students. With their numbers rising fast, Insight addresses
some of your burning questions on the population shifts.
THERE are now a total of 4.84million people living in Singapore.
Of these, 35per cent are foreign-born.
They fall into three groups: new citizens, permanent residents (PRs) and
non-residents.
In the first six months of this year, Singapore granted citizenship to 9,619
foreigners. The total number of new citizens since 2001 is 81,553.
There are 478,200 PRs here.
So, what are these new citizens and PRs like?
Figures just released by the National Population Secretariat (NPS) indicate that
they tend to be better-educated than born-and-bred Singaporeans.
Take those granted PR and citizenship this year, for example: 77per cent of the
new PRs and 62per cent of the new citizens aged 20 and above have post-secondary
education. The corresponding figure for existing Singapore citizens is 36per
cent.
While declining to give a breakdown of where these new residents hail from, the
NPS says most are from South-east, South and East Asia. A smaller number are
from the Americas, Oceania and Europe.
Public data shows that the number of new immigrants from South Asia is so
significant that it has caused a shift in the ethnic make-up of the population.
Ethnic Indians now comprise 8.9per cent of the resident population, which is
made up of both citizens and PRs, up from 7.1per cent in 1990.
The bulk of foreigners here are non-residents. Their numbers have risen to
1.2million - an all-time high.
Within this pool, there are two groups.
The first is here on a transient basis. This group is made up of work permit
holders here to work as construction workers and maids. As of December last
year, there were 757,000 work permit holders.
The second group of people are regarded as potential PRs and new citizens. There
are 143,000 such foreigners here on employment passes and another 85,000 foreign
students.
2 Has it become easier to obtain citizenship or permanent residency?
WITH the number of PRs and new citizens on the rise, the NPS says it is
understandable that some people believe it has become easier to secure a red
passport. But it stresses that the criteria are 'no less stringent' than before.
New residents are admitted on the basis of educational qualifications, their
immediate and potential economic contributions and how well they and their
family are likely to integrate into Singapore society.
The last factor is assessed on the basis of the applicant's length of stay here,
the language he speaks, the culture he is from, whether or not he has family
members here, and his contributions to society here. That would include his
participation in grassroots and community work.
As Singaporeans become better educated, the NPS said, via e-mail, 'more will be
expected of potential immigrants who wish to apply for PR and citizenship'.
It declined to give details on the number of applications and the success rate.
Ms Ragini Dhanvantray, managing director of Rikvin Consultancy, which helps
facilitate immigration here, observes that the time it takes to obtain permanent
residency has fallen.
'In the past, employment pass holders would apply for permanent residency only
after working here for two years.
'Now, they can apply after just six months - and about 60 to 70per cent will get
it,' she says.
3 Do we really need immigrants? What if we close the door on them?
IF SINGAPORE stopped accepting immigrants right now, deaths among citizens and
PRs would overtake births in 12 years, says veteran demographer Saw Swee Hock.
That is based on a projection of a total fertility rate (TFR) of 1.31.
Demographers use TFR to project the average number of babies that will be born
to a woman in a population.
Singapore's TFR is now 1.29.
That means Singapore's population will start to shrink in 2020.
Even if the TFR goes up to 1.51, the population will still shrink - albeit
later, in 2025.
Prof Saw, the author of a book entitled Population Of Singapore and a
professorial fellow at the Institute of the South-east Asian Studies, thus
states emphatically: 'We need foreigners, forever and ever.'
The need to grow Singapore's population is a function of the need to grow the
economy, he notes.
Singapore Management University economist Hoon Hian Teck says that with the
growing prominence of the services sector, the shortfall in skilled labour has
become more acute.
'In addition, the economy has undergone an important shift from being a
technology follower to one that also creates new technologies,' he adds.
That means placing a high value on skilled researchers, both local and foreign.
In an interview last year, National Population Committee chairman Wong Kan Seng
calculated that for the economy to grow at 6per cent annually, Singapore needs
an extra 87,300 workers each year.
The NPS notes that as a country without natural resources, Singapore needs to
depend on human capital for growth. And the global competition for talent is
intense, it adds.
'If Singapore does not welcome them, they will simply look elsewhere and compete
against us.'
4 Are there other ways to keep the economy growing?
YES, say some experts.
One way is to increase labour productivity.
A country's economic growth is the sum of two factors - the size of the labour
force and its productivity. So higher productivity can compensate for a smaller
labour force.
Labour economist Hui Weng Tat, of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, who
has served as a consultant to the Manpower Ministry, believes that this is the
most 'desirable' strategy.
The share that labour productivity growth has contributed to Singapore's total
economic growth has declined steadily over the past two decades.
Prof Hui charted the decline in a paper he co-wrote with economist Aamir Rafique
Hashmi.
From 1995 to 2000, for instance, productivity growth averaged 2.5per cent, and
accounted for 39.7per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) growth. That was
down from 51.6per cent in the preceding five years.
The figure was also low compared with those in other developed economies.
For the same period from 1995 to 2000, productivity growth accounted for 60.1per
cent of the United States' GDP growth, and 102.2per cent of Japan's.
Prof Hui projects that if Singapore's productivity growth can be boosted to
account for 60per cent of GDP growth, the demand for foreign labour will
steadily go down.
According to his projections, at current productivity growth rates, Singapore
will need 2.78million foreign workers by 2034.
But if productivity were one percentage point higher, then Singapore would need
only 1.48million foreign workers by 2034 - a difference of 1.3million workers.
But such a productivity boost could prove 'elusive', he says, as it depends on
many factors, from infrastructure to workforce quality and fiscal incentives.
The NPS says that productivity improvement remains a key focus of the
Government.
The second way to grow the economy without increasing the reliance on foreign
labour is by encouraging older Singaporeans to work longer, and more women to
return to the workforce, says Prof Saw.
The participation rates of both groups remain low compared with those of other
countries.
The government has been trying to do both, and has made some progress.
But some, such as MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC Inderjit Singh, question if it is
necessary to push so hard for growth year after year.
Mr Singh, a businessman, says: 'I personally feel that we have adopted a 'grow
at all costs' economic policy.
'I would have preferred a more moderate growth and, therefore, a more moderate
population growth.'
He believes that the decision to build two integrated resorts in one go and a
new sports hub, and expand the transport infrastructure in a massive way, is a
case of 'trying to do too much too quickly'.
Prof Hui says that in an island-state with a very high population density of
6,000persq km, 'it might be argued that the lower growth target path could in
fact provide a higher standard of living in Singapore'.
But lawyer and Hong Kah GRC MP Alvin Yeo is not so sure.
'There is the concern that with a small, open economy like ours, which is so
susceptible to external influences which are hard to predict, planning for very
modest growth could result in substantial under-shooting of our targets.
'But this is perhaps an issue which we need to review from time to time, as our
economy, and society, matures.'
5 What can be done about the stresses caused by a rising number of
foreigners?
AS FAR as the hardware goes, the NPS says the Government is 'confident that with
creative planning and technology, Singapore can accommodate a larger population
without compromising the quality of our living environment'.
Already, steps have been taken to relieve the stresses due to a larger
population.
The frequency of MRT trains at peak hours went up earlier this year, though
commuters are still feeling the squeeze.
A new hospital in Yishun will open in 2010 and international schools have been
expanding their intakes.
Housing for the large number of foreign workers here has become an issue. Space
for another 65,000 beds has been set aside at 11 sites around the island but the
dormitories will take some time to build.
But the NPS is clear on one point - the answer lies in integration, not
segregation.
'We must help encourage integration everywhere - in schools, at the workplace,
in the neighbourhood and the larger community,' it says.
But Singaporeans such as Mr Mike Tay, 53, an entrepreneur, remain unhappy about
competition from foreigners for jobs.
'Personally, I see that most do not add value to the economy, but are just a
pool of cheaper labour,' he says.
Technical officer Lee Joo Meng, 55, also has doubts about the quality of
immigrants allowed in.
'The next batches of immigrants need to be of a more competitive quality,' he
says. 'No more foreign project engineers who declare 'I am learning through
repeating mistakes'!'
Another area of concern is that the large numbers of foreigners here will affect
the 'Singaporean Singapore' social fabric woven over the past 40 years, says Mr
Tay.
'They will never have the same sense of belonging as those born here and who
served national service,' he adds.
Mr Singh, the MP, says that if the number of foreigners were smaller, they would
have felt a need to mix with the locals, and the locals would have felt a sense
of responsibility in making the foreigners feel at home.
But that is not the case now because the influx of foreigners has grown so large
so fast.
He adds: 'Instead, Singaporeans see them as a group trying to impose different
social practices within their neighbourhoods.'
Government leaders have sought to remind Singaporeans that Singapore has always
been an immigrant society.
Prof Saw, however, draws a distinction between the first-generation immigrants
and today's.
'When our grandparents came here, they were pushed by poverty. Though some went
back, many stayed on to make a living, and their children were brought up as
locals,' he said.
'Today, we don't know how many of those who come in will continue to stay,' he
says, noting that many are highly mobile.
A crucial factor is how these immigrants raise their children.
With PRs making up an increasing share of the population, the government will
need to relook various policies, he says.
For instance, PRs now do not need to send their children to local schools.
But encouraging them to do so will help the integration process.
'If 100per cent are sent to local schools, there is nothing to worry about, he
says.
'But if a high proportion of those who settle down here go to the international
schools, they don't grow up as true citizens.
'Then, will the second generation stay?'
Yet, there must be a balance between measures to aid integration and the need to
ensure Singapore's rules are not so onerous as to turn off would-be PRs.
Prof Saw acknowledges that the matter is 'a real headache'.
Ms Dhanvantray presents a different perspective.
She thinks more can be done to help new immigrants settle in and feel at home.
'Once the immigrants are inside Singapore, they are left to themselves to face
the challenges of adapting to the local culture and society,' she said.
'Immigrants with families have to tackle the emotional and cultural shocks of
relocation and also the process of familiarisation with the educational system.
This is one of the biggest challenges.'
She suggests support groups to help immigrants cope with the changes, and the
provision of basics such as a guidebook on the law, local neighbourhoods,
schools and important addresses.
6 What will Singapore look like in the future?
WHAT is certain is that Singapore's population will continue to grow in the near
future.
The resident population - citizens and PRs - now stands at 3.64million.
That is projected to go up to 4.8million by 2030.
The NPS says that is based on a TFR of 1.28, and an average nett migration of
50,000 for the next 10 years, and 26,200 a year thereafter.
What is less clear is how many of the 4.8million are likely to be born here, and
how many born overseas.
In July, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew revealed his own comfort level.
He said: 'You need 65per cent of the population to be born-and-bred
Singaporeans, steeped in the culture, with instincts of what a Singaporean is.
'They will slowly influence the migrants who join us to become like us.'
Back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that over 80per cent of the current
resident population of 3.63million comprise born-and-bred Singaporeans.
The NPS's assurance is that the Government fully intends for Singaporeans to
'remain as the core of our population'.
'We do not want to be like some Middle Eastern countries, where non-resident
foreigners far outnumber the indigenous population,' it says.
'For Singaporeans to remain as the core, we must have more babies and encourage
more suitable immigrants to become Singapore citizens.'
 |
News/Notices 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Circular No 109/2012: Be a Part of the Bar Council Constitutional Law Committee
