|
©New Sunday Times
(Used by permission)
by Aniza Damis
Under the proposed No-Fault Liability scheme, those injured in accidents can
expect prompt benefits, regardless of who caused the accident and without having
to go to court.
PUTRAJAYA: People who are injured in road accidents may no longer have to
worry about how to pay for their medical treatment.
This is because the Attorney-General wants to introduce a
no-fault payment scheme for those involved in motor-vehicle accidents.
Under the proposed scheme, injured persons can expect prompt benefits,
regardless of who caused the accident, without having to go to court.
Initial minimum payments, which will assist the injured person in the immediate
aftermath of the accident, could be paid within a week of the claim being filed.
All a victim has to do is to submit two reports, a police accident report and a
medical report, to receive compensation.
Although the source of the funding has yet to be determined,
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said it is likely to come from motor
vehicle insurance companies — from premiums paid by vehicle owners.
"The objective of this new scheme is to reduce the burden on the people," Gani
said.
Instead of paying for third-party insurance (which only covers the person you
knock down), vehicle owners are expected to get comprehensive insurance (which
covers everyone, including the vehicle owner).
The scheme will apply to any accident in Malaysia involving motor vehicles
registered in Malaysia.
"Many people come up to me to tell me that they are not obtaining justice fast
enough," said Gani.
"A few years ago, an old man told me that it took him several years to get his
claim in court. At the end of the day, he got only a fraction of what he was
entitled to.
"What was of most concern to me was that he didn’t get the compensation at the
time when he needed it the most — at the time of recovery, soon after the
accident."
Currently, under the fault-based system, a person has to wade through years of
legal administration before he is awarded compensation.
In the fault-based system, if no fault can be established, then an innocent
accident victim would be without remedy.
The prompt payment of benefits is expected to a "fair and expeditious relief" to
the injured person during the period of incapacity, so that he may maintain a
reasonable standard of living.
Benefits will include property damage, pain and suffering for injuries
sustained, medical expenses, loss of earnings and, in the instance of death,
funeral expenses and compensation for dependants.
However, the scheme will not be applicable to accidents caused by uninsured
vehicles, or people who are "repugnant to justice", such as a driver driving
under the influence of alcohol, or criminals who get injured while trying to
escape from the law.
The scheme will do away with the fault-based liability system currently in
force, removing the option for civil action. This will be enforced by
legislation.
If there is any dissatisfaction as to the quantum, the party cannot go to court,
but instead has to go through mediation.
"The quantum will probably be less than what you would get at the courts, but if
you factor in what it would cost to have to go to court, pay the lawyer, wait
several years, this way is more beneficial to the injured party in the end,"
said Gani.
Insurance premiums are also expected to go down since insurance companies would
not need to spend money on legal or administrative fees in going to court
because there is no need to prove fault.
"The No-Fault Liability (NFL) scheme will alleviate a lot of the backlog of
cases in the courts, because it will free them to attend to other matters," said
Gani.
As at July 1, last year, there were 11,890 insurance claims pending in the
magistrate’s courts, 621 in the High Courts, and 37,248 in the Sessions Courts.
Compensation claims from road accidents ranked the second highest among the
total number of civil cases filed.
Gani said preparatory work on the new scheme started early last year and is now
moving to the meeting stage with all stakeholders.
"We have to consider what the impact will be on the public, insurance companies,
and lawyers.
"We won’t know how this will impact insurance companies until we hear their
views."
Discussions will also focus on which body will administer the scheme.
The A-G’s Chambers is also finalising a Preliminary Issues Paper and
questionnaire that will be opened to the public to take into account the
public’s comments.
The paper is expected to be posted soon on the A-G Chambers website,
www.agc.gov.my.
Gani is hoping to set up the scheme as soon as possible. "If it is a good thing,
and everyone supports it, then why wait?"
The NFL scheme is currently being practised in various versions in New Zealand,
the US and certain parts of Australia, Canada and India.
Amicable solution lies in No-Fault Liability scheme
THE No-Fault Liability (NFL) scheme is not completely alien to Malaysia, since
we already have such a scheme in place, albeit in a small area.
In 1957, the Treasury Collision Agreement was set up between the government and
some insurance companies.
Claims arising from collisions between government vehicles and vehicles insured
by insurance companies that are parties to the Agreement, would be settled
"without determination of liability".
But if or when the scheme is introduced, it will change the legal landscape
completely.
Society will have to get used to the idea of not pointing the finger and trying
to apportion blame in order to get benefits.
The most liberating thing about the NFL scheme is that it removes the bitterness
and negativity often produced when parties are caught in a legal tussle, which
can affect the recovery of the injured person, says Attorney-General Tan Sri
Abdul Gani Patail.
Benefits of the scheme
• Full protection for all motor accident victims, including victims of
hit-and-run cases. All injured persons would be compensated.
• No need to prove fault of other party in order to get compensation.
• All a victim has to produce is two reports: A police report on the accident
and a medical report.
• Prompt initial payment of benefits, which can be as fast as one week.
• Prompt medical attention and treatment of victims, because benefits can be
used to pay hospital bills.
• Savings on legal and administrative fees — victims no longer need to hire
lawyers, go to court, or wait years for court-awarded compensation.
• Insurance companies will no longer be burdened with having to set aside funds
for six years to meet claims for personal injuries or deaths.
No-Fault Liability scheme: How our current system works
by Aniza Damis
THE No-Fault system is a safety net that catches all persons who are injured in
an accident, regardless of their guilt or innocence.
Whether a person contributed the least to the accident, or
was the main cause, that person would be awarded damages that go towards paying
medical and hospital fees, repairing the vehicle, making up for lost income, or,
in the instance of death, to pay for funeral costs and the welfare of loved ones
left behind.
In this system, no person is abandoned by society.
However, in the fault-based system that is practised in Malaysia today, it is
only the "innocent" injured person who gets compensation.
This is because innocent victims are covered by third-party insurance from which
the victim is entitled to compensation.
The "not so innocent" person — the one responsible for causing the accident —
does not get anything, even though he, too, might have been injured in the
accident.
Unless that person has personal accident insurance, the "guilty" person has no
safety net.
If the guilty party is the breadwinner and dies without insurance, his
dependants have lost their source of financial stability as well.
However, even though under the current system things seem weighted towards the
innocent party, it is not so easy to claim compensation.
The "victim" has to go to court and prove several things first before he can be
awarded damages:
* his innocence — that he did not contribute to the accident,
* the guilt of the other party, and,
* that the guilty party was negligent in his conduct and did not exercise
reasonable care.
But the road from the accident to the awarding of damages can be extremely long
and tedious.
If the accident was serious, the case becomes a criminal matter.
The driver of the offending vehicle would be advised by his lawyer to plead not
guilty.
The case, thus, goes to court.
Criminal trials can take several years. The innocent party must wait because the
result of the criminal trial will determine the bargaining power of each side.
The innocent party will then hire a lawyer to take a civil suit against the
guilty party.
The lawyer for the innocent man and the lawyer for the guilty man exchange many
letters.
A doctor spends time looking at the injuries to ascertain the damage, and to
determine what is needed to "repair" the injury.
Both parties wait a few years before their case can be heard in court.
The judge then decides and makes an award.
Often, the damages awarded is less than what was demanded.
If either party is not happy with the decision or the award, the matter is
appealed.
And this then adds a few more years to the matter.
By the time the "victim" finally gets his compensation, it is many many years
later and a large percentage will go towards paying the lawyer.
In the meantime, the injured person still has to pay his hospital bills. And, if
he was unable to work as a result of his injury, he has no income and is unable
to support himself or his family.
In our current fault-based system, compensation will not be given to the victim
if he cannot prove that the injury was caused by the defendant’s failure to take
reasonable care.
And negligence must be "reasonably foreseeable".
As this is often so difficult to prove, at the end of the day, the majority of
motor vehicle accident victims receive no compensation at all. And they have no
other net to fall back on.
|
In New Zealand, the country that led the world in the no-fault scheme, one of the infractural organisations is the Government-owned Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). The ACC is also known as the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation.
All employers pay a levy to the ACC. The closest we have in Malaysia is SOCSO. I am sure we can get SOCSO to come into the scheme.
New Zealanders need NOT take comprehensive insurance policies for their motor vehicles to become entitled for payouts under the ACC scheme. Based on what has been reported, the Malaysian scheme is predicated on all motor vehicle owners subscribing to comprehensive insurance coverage. This will mean an additional burden for all Malaysian vehicle owners.
It is also well known that there has been abuse of the New Zealand ACC scheme. As I write, the seepage is being monitored and, where applicable, stemmed out.
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng