feed
Home arrow News arrow Members' Opinions and Comments arrow Comment: Lawyers' march reflects Bar's sacred duty
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Comment: Lawyers' march reflects Bar's sacred duty PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 01 October 2007 08:09am
©Sin Chew

WALK FOR JUSTICE: Bar Council members leading the Walk. More pictures below.

©New Straits Times (Used by permission)
by Roger Tan

“Woe betide the day an individual or a body of persons is capable of controlling the head of the judiciary and the head of the Bar.”

“LAWYERS don't walk every day. They don't walk every month. They don't even walk every year. This is the third time lawyers are walking,” said Ambiga Sreenevasan, chair of the Malaysian Bar Council before the start of the “Walk for Justice” last Wednesday. (Click here to view the Picture Gallery)

How true.

There were only two other occasions when lawyers walked in the 60 years of the Malaysian Bar's history.

On April 7, 1981, about 200 lawyers marched from the Lake Club to Parliament House to protest the tabling of the Societies (Amendment) Bill 1981.

Then on Dec 4, 1998, about 100 Kuala Lumpur-based lawyers marched on the Court of Appeal in support of lawyer Zainur Zakaria who was appealing against a three-month jail sentence for contempt in the trial of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

On Sept 26, about 2,000 lawyers walked in the spirit of camaraderie for 3.5 kilometres from the Palace of Justice to the Prime Minister's Department, and then stood in the rain in support of their leaders who later submitted two memoranda to the Prime Minister's Office, urging the government to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry to probe the state of judiciary and a commission on judicial appointments and promotions.

In fact, it was unwise earlier on for the police to stop seven buses ferrying lawyers from entering Putrajaya. By making these 200 stranded lawyers - who are mainly younger ones who hitherto had hardly experienced any deprivation of rights - walk an extra five kilometres or so from the highway to the Palace of Justice, this long march will now surely ignite a spark in their hearts to take up issues affecting the citizens’ rights.

The Sept 26 “Walk for Justice” was peaceful, symbolic and meaningful. Lawyers, regardless of age, race, religion (including Muslim lawyers despite their fasting) and gender, had come out from the comforts of their air-conditioned rooms on a working day to make a statement - obviously not a political one, for otherwise they would have donned their black robes walking down the boulevard, comparing themselves with the red-robed monks marching in the streets of Yangon.

While the walk by members of this noble profession may have warmed the cockles of many hearts, the idea to walk has also appeared to be anathema to some.

Immediately, de facto Law Minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz described the conduct of the lawyers as “unbecoming". The Sin Chew Daily even reported the lawyer-turned-politician going as far as to describe those who participated in the walk as having the brains of an opposition party when in fact many of the brains who took part are members of Barisan Nasional component parties.

Then Bernama quoted Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin calling on members of the Bar to set up a commission to investigate the “unprofessional conduct of their leaders".

Well, it is hoped that by now, the minister has cooled down a little. In fact, Nazri is correct to say that currently the Bar and the government enjoy an excellent working relationship. This is, in no small measure, attributable to the minister and the Bar Council appreciates it. It cannot be gainsaid too that “Walk for Justice” had been possible because of the openness practised by the Abdullah administration.

In fact, both the minister and the Bar are on the same track in protecting the judiciary, except that each is looking at the issue from a different angle. The minister is concerned that the lawyers’ action would undermine public confidence in the judiciary. The lawyers, on the other hand, being stakeholders in the administration of justice, are concerned with what they saw and heard in the video clip. They now find themselves in the vanguard against bad judges when the video clip has threatened the independence of the judiciary.

As former lord president Tun Mohamed Suffian said: “The two essentials of the rule of the law are the independence of the Bar and the independence of the judiciary.”

Woe betide the day an individual or a body of persons is capable of controlling the head of the judiciary and the head of the Bar.

In fact, to lawyers, this episode which is more important than the nude-squat incident, affords the Abdullah administration an opportunity to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry to restore public confidence in the judiciary which has been severely eroded since the 1988 judicial crisis.

In any event, the Bar Council has postponed the extraordinary general meeting fixed for Saturday, maybe to a date after the independent panel's report. Members of the investigation panel can expect the Bar to go through its report with a fine-toothed comb.

The oft-misunderstood role of the Bar is best explained by former prime minister, Tun Hussein Onn: “It is the duty of the legal profession to uphold the cause of justice without fear or favour. To effectively discharge this role, the profession must remain independent and be seen to be so. The Bar has a duty to speak up on matters of public interest affecting citizens’ rights and comment on proposed legislation affecting such rights.

“In doing so, the Bar must be constructive and must conduct itself with decorum. The government must appreciate the role of the Bar and be respectful of its comments - even when it differs with the profession's views.”

Roger Tan is a member of the Malaysian Bar Council.

Bar Council members leading the Walk for Justice

 ©Jeff Ooi

 ©Jeff Ooi

 ©MBW

 ©MBW

 ©MBW

Comments (2)Add Comment
Walk for Justice
written by Tan Yu Chai (via email), Monday, October 01 2007 11:26 am

Dear Members of the Bar,

I am writing as a Malaysian who by training an accountant rather than a lawyer.

I want to record my highest regards for the courage, resolve and determination of the Members of the Bar and your Council who took part in the Walk for Justice.

Yes, this walk may be just the beginning and until and unless we see the country is returned to its glorious days of Judicial Independence and Integrity, we shall not rest! If the judiciary can be compromised for personal gains and if it can be 'bought', when then is the redress for the man on the street when the very foundation of this nation is pulled away under us?

Let's push on, not just the Bar alone, but for all of us Malaysians whose conscience cannot rest until we see the foundations of this great nation of us are solidly rebuilt for the many generations after us!

Tan Yu Chai (via email)

MORE MARCHERS, IF NOT FOR ...
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Monday, October 01 2007 01:31 pm

My dear Roger

If not for it being the fasting month, police mounting road blocks, and the Deputy Prime Minister's announcement of the setting up of a three-man panel announced in the newspapers a day earlier, I am sure that easily another thousand of my learned friends would have turned up!

Mind you, Court cases were going on normally as well, although many litigation lawyers were there to bond with their fellow brothers and sister-at-law.

And yes, it was a real bonding done in sweat and water later provided by the rain. Although drenched to the skin, I feel proud to be part of the learned profession. And I saw for myself the multi-racial character of the participating marchers. This speaks for justice being not just blind, but also blind to all races.

The resultant blisters and the common cold were all worth it.

With the benefit of hindsight, had the right signals been sent, there would never have been a march. The march and the overwhelming support for it occurred because the wrong signals were sent.

The march is for justice, let no one dispute that. We need a Judiciary that is always stamped by Independence, Impartiality and Integrity.

May the Lord bless my country with these basics for the good of all Malaysians.

Stephen Tan Ban Cheng


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2012 Bar Council Subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2012 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2012 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2012 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Bar Council Bookshop
    Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012)
Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Your Login


We have 35 guests online

Malaysian Bar blasts police violence

Bar council: Police brutality worst in Bersih 3.0



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
September 2011 October 2011 November 2011
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 39 1
Week 40 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Week 41 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Week 42 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Week 43 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Week 44 30 31
Google