News/Articles/Notices
News
Letters & Others
Judiciary: Wrong move | Judiciary: Wrong move |
|
|
|
| Friday, 28 September 2007 12:13pm | |
|
Whatever the reasons or grouses it may have, a memorandum
could have been handed to the government in a manner befitting the organisation. Let's place our full confidence in the panel and its three members. Judiciary: Embrace reform and review current system by Mohan Sankaran, for ERA Consumer Malaysia The recent Auditor-General's Report and the recent "judicial
fixing" video clip is no different. In the United Kingdom, the appointment and promotion of
judges come under the purview of the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC) which
was established under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Comments (1)
![]() Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|









©

















Members of the Malaysian Bar did a walk; and the name of that walk is "Justice"; and rightfully, they had congregated at the "Palace of Justice"; and not the "Palace of Just Ice".
Does W.M. Ramli ever consider it important to live in a fair and just environment? It has many reasons for the Malaysian lawyers to have walked. First and foremost, it is their duty to uphold the law and its fair process - so, when they considered such a walk as necessary, they walked, and they did not shirk from their duties and responsibilities.
W.M. Ramli should, in fact, be grateful to the Malaysian Bar for having walked for and on his behalf. On account of the constraints the members of the Malaysian Bar experienced, it was with much pain and strains that they had walked, BUT for the sake of Justice, they deemed it worth their while.
What a sacrifice indeed, and we, the Malaysian public, dutifully respect them for the honour and the right legal pathway which our Malaysian lawyers had shown on that day.
Tan Peek Guat