News
Legal/General News
Raja Petra is ignorant of history for calling Chin Peng a freedom fighter - historian | Raja Petra is ignorant of history for calling Chin Peng a freedom fighter - historian |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, 26 November 2008 06:57pm | |
|
SEREMBAN, WED: Blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin has been described as being ignorant of history for assuming that the former secretary-general of the Communist Party of Malaya, Chin Peng, was a freedom fighter. Negeri Sembilan History Association treasurer Mohd Misan Mastor said today the Malays had fought colonialism since the fall of Melaka Sultanate and throughout the Portuguese, Dutch, British and Japanese occupation. “Chin Peng was not the first man who put up the fight,” he told Bernama
here today. He challenged Raja Petra to prove that the independence of
the country was due to the efforts of others. Comments (3)
![]()
Operation discredit and distort...??
written by Charles Hector, Thursday, November 27 2008 03:14 am
History is normally the version of the persons in power - i.e. UMNO-led Barisan Nasional.
Guess who the real ignoramus is written by Nicole Tan Lee Koon, Thursday, November 27 2008 01:02 pm
What was Chin Peng doing then? Took up arms for fun? Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




©














History has always been written by the hunters who survive the lion after their contact. Like truth, therefore, history is a point on the hill from where one stands to look at things and such views are understandably always subject to academic interpretation.
Academically, it is not enough to dismiss the views of one's detractors by labelling. It is certainly better to state the facts on which one bases one's conclusion, bearing in mind that some of these facts may be academically challenged and disputed.
Novels – I repeat novels, and not academic tomes – such as The Grand Delusion and Malaya Upside- Down or Marai-ee authored by my late friend and colleague in journalism, former teacher and diplomat Chin Kee Onn who wrote the first book after what he told me were his days of debriefing surrendered enemy personnel, The Jungle is Neutral by Spencer Chapman and The War of The Running Dogs by a former British journalist and other books of the same genre give us glimpses into the communist struggle.
Many of these so-called communists, novelist Chin told me in an interview, were actually unsettled by Japanese militarist atrocities. They were out for revenge after their entire families were massacred in the “sook ching” operations conducted by the Japanese militarists. They fled to the hills in Perak, fighting the Japanese militarists as nationalists and some of them later joined the communists who were co-operating with the British headquartered in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka).
It was after the Allied victory in World War II that the British betrayed the communists and these nationalists who were virtually forced to stage their armed insurrection.
My pet but academically unproven theory, probably romanticist, is that during World War II, many Asian nationalists from India to Thailand consciously divided themselves into the Allied and Axis camps – for instance, Mahatma Gandhi and Subhas Chandra Bose of India and Pibul Songgram and Pridi Phanomyong of Thailand. Even Filipino president Manuel Quezon, before his evacuation, instructed his personal aide to safeguard the Filipinos by working with the invading Japanese when Manila fell.
It is far too early to dismiss Chin Peng as a “freedom fighter.” As put philosophically, freedom fighters of the American Revolution would have been termed rebels had their “sacred cause” for freedom failed. So, what is a “freedom fighter”? For that matter, Thomas Paine, who gave us the book, The Rights of Man, would have been hanged and quartered as a traitor of the British Empire had George Washington failed!
What is perhaps more important is what kind of nation-state we are building and what can collectively achieve as a nation-state.
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng