Home
News
General Opinions/Comments
Once again, what is 1Malaysia? — The Malaysian Insider
News
General Opinions/Comments
Once again, what is 1Malaysia? — The Malaysian Insider | Once again, what is 1Malaysia? — The Malaysian Insider |
|
|
|
| Friday, 17 April 2009 07:53am | |
|
©The Malaysian Insider (Used by permission) APRIL 16 — Admittedly, we were wrong about 1Malaysia, Datuk Seri Najib Razak's slogan for his administration. It’s 1Malaysia, not One Malaysia.
Notwithstanding the semantics, we are still quite in the dark about what it is but we know what it isn't. It isn't Malaysian Malaysia. In not so many words yesterday, the new Prime Minister drew broad strokes to describe the slogan where Malaysians must “stand together, think and act as one people under the 1Malaysia concept”.
“Let’s break away from operating in the ethnic prism as we have done over so many years. This is also the meaning of the 1Malaysia concept. "We must respect each other, go beyond tolerance and build trust among each other and build trust between various ethnic groups,” state news agency Bernama quoted Najib as saying. All well and good. So, basically a Bangsa Malaysia expounded under Vision 2020 by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. And after 52 years of independence, we are still seeking the elusive Malaysian among the country's citizens. But in concrete ways, what? Will Najib follow a suggestion by Dharm Navaratnam who wrote to a news portal suggesting that the government do away with race classification in official application forms. "Perception is a key in human behaviour and relations and the first step to achieving ‘1Malaysia' is for Malaysians to feel that they are Malaysians first. Getting rid of the race classification will be a major step in this direction," Navaratnam wrote. And in acting like one people, can the 1Malaysia concept set a time frame for the New Economic Policy markers that have strangled relations between the major races in Malaysia. To be Malaysian would mean such strictures disappear in time. It has to be said that no one questions the special rights and privileges of the ethnic communities from the Malay peninsula across to Sabah and Sarawak but quotas are not set in the Federal Constitution. And in talking about one people, what about the freedom of religion and the rights associated with that? Can “Allah” only be for a section of the nation but not for others? How can one have trust when there are suspicions about other faiths using “Allah” in their prayers? In the Bernama report, it quoted Najib as saying he had explained the 1Malaysia concept to his Cabinet and reminded them “don’t be just concerned about your own community but strive to fulfil the high expectations of all Malaysians”. Indeed, the expectations are high. Freeing 13 ISA detainees with conditions has disappointed many. Lamenting that the loss of Bukit Gantang and Bukit Selambau to a certain section of the voters who did not reciprocate the ruling coalition's efforts is regrettable. Two weeks have gone by since Najib assumed the highest office in the land but he is running short of time to explain in detail what his 1Malaysia is about apart from being his weblog's address. Otherwise, whatever support Barisan Nasional has left will evaporate rather than condense into the 1Malaysia his advisers have cleverly coined. 1Malaysia has to be real, it cannot be a catchall phrase that Malaysia Boleh turned out to be. Comments (2)
![]() Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



























1 (read as ‘one’) Malaysia means fighting all snatch thieves as one.
If the snatch thieves thrive and abound in Malaysia, it means the failure of One Malaysia.
As a show of ‘unity’ and in supporting its strength (if any), One Malaysia ought to ensure that all citizens of Malaysia are against robbing and snatching and the illegal removal and destruction of other Malaysians’ belongings, lives and well-being.
Hilary Clinton said : “US seeks to freeze assets of pirates”.
This shows something is being done to promote the image of ONE WORLD.
While it is the duty of the US to protect and promote ONE WORLD, it is also the duty of all Malaysian Political Leaders to have, own and possess the political will to destroy all SNATCH THIEVES and robbers in our midst. What is the Police doing in this regard?
However, to our local political leaders, they have other priorities in their individual lists, though they want and desire ONE MALAYSIA - but/while having NO regard for the suffering Malaysians!
Will all political leaders blogg on this topic:
Are Banks to be made responsible for thefts happening outside their premises - if such robberies are committed by the robber/robbers seen (and captured in their CCTV) within their premises prior to the happening - of the robbery outside their premises?
One Malaysia means not helping the INSTITUTIONS all the time; but the need to understand and assist in solving the cries of the other victimized Malaysians, sometimes!
Tan Peek Guat