website statistics
feed
Home arrow News arrow Legal/General News arrow Man wins RM10,000 for distress at not being able to withdraw from ATM
Advertisement
Man wins RM10,000 for distress at not being able to withdraw from ATM PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 17 July 2008 05:53pm

©The Star (Used by permission)
by K.Kasturi Dewi

GEORGE TOWN: A businessman who could not use his ATM card to withdraw RM300 to treat his friends to dinner in Kuala Lumpur six years ago was awarded RM10,000 damages by a magistrate's court here.

Magistrate M. Rajalingam awarded Lambert B. Samson, 83, the sum for the inconvenience, mental distress, and embarrassment he suffered.

Rajalingam also ordered CIMB Bank Berhad, formerly known as Southern Bank Berhad, to pay Samson 8% interest per annum on the damages from the date of judgment and costs.

Samson had filed a suit against the bank, claiming he was unable to withdraw money from three different banks on April 10, 2002 using the Autokad issued to him by the bank despite having more than RM10,000 in his account.

In his statement of claim, Samson said he had promised two friends a dinner treat that night but due to insufficient cash at the time, had tried to withdraw money from an ATM.

He was made to understand the card, issued in 2000, could be used at the ATM of other banks, namely RHB Bank, Public Bank and Hong Leong Bank and was annoyed when his attempts to do so failed.

Samson said that upon returning to Penang, he went to the Pulau Tikus branch of the bank and met an officer who agreed to forward his complaint to the headquarters in Kuala Lumpur.

However, the numerous correspondences between Samson and the bank did not make any headway, culminating in the suit.

The bank's defence was based on a Terms and Conditions agreement apparently signed by Samson while receiving the said Autokad on Nov 18, 2000.

The bank said three clauses in the documents stated among others that it would not be responsible or liable if the card was not honoured or accepted for use.

The bank also denied responsibility or liability for any loss, damage, injury, inconvenience or embarrassment allegedly suffered by the plaintiff.

Rajalingam held that the first nail was hammered into the defendant's case when it failed to call the bank officer to testify whether she had explained the terms and conditions of the agreement before Samson agreed to sign up for the Autokad in 2000.

"The bank's breach of the contract entitled the plaintiff to claim damages for non-pecuniary losses (losses not related to money).

"The court also finds that the plaintiff had been subjected to humiliation, anxiety and distress as one of the plaintiff's friends Anselm Charles Fernandez, a legal officer with the Attorney-General's chambers, who was at the dinner testified that he had assumed that the plaintiff did not have enough funds in his account,'' Rajalingam said.

Samson, who is adviser to the Elba Group of Companies based in Penang and owner of various entertainment outlets, was not present in court on Thursday. His counsel K. Simon Murali told the court that he was not able to walk on his own and needed the aid of a walker.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Username Password
Remember Me | Register | Lost Password?

21st Lawasia Conference, Kuala Lumpur



show last 4hrs - 24hrs