News
Legal/General News
Judge opens Pandora’s box | Judge opens Pandora’s box |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, 25 June 2008 07:09am | |
|
Chin delivered a 16-page statement after the one he made on June 9 that
astounded the nation. It was alleged that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had exerted
undue influence upon the judiciary to make it decide in the government’s favour. Comments (7)
![]()
How now Datuk Zaid?
written by Visvanathan Murugiah, Wednesday, June 25 2008 10:23 am
Dear Datuk,
WHO IS LYING OR MISLEADING US?
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Wednesday, June 25 2008 11:19 am
Dr Mahathir Mohamad said that Ian Chin left the "boot camp" without completing it. Chin subsequently said that he completed the course.
What do I believe
written by Yeo Yang Poh, Wednesday, June 25 2008 12:17 pm
History is seldom by unanimity. There are bound to be assertions and denials.
TRUTH IS A POINT ON A HILL ...
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Wednesday, June 25 2008 01:14 pm
My Yeo
separation of powers? what is that?
written by Lim Chong Leong, Wednesday, June 25 2008 02:04 pm
What I understand about the government structure in Malaysia after some almost 18 years of practice is this: The King will act upon the advice of the PM. The PM will appoint and promote judges. The Speaker will act under the direction of the minister in the PM's department. The CJ reports to that same minister without portfolio.
Boot-camp? And for judges? written by Teo Siew Chin, Wednesday, June 25 2008 02:58 pm
"Dr Mahathir Mohamad said that Ian Chin left the "boot camp" without completing it. Chin subsequently said that he completed the course. Who is lying? The former Prime Minister or the sitting High Court Judge?" Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




•







Indeed, we Malaysians are in grave danger and will continue to be in this state if any member of our judiciary is treated the way Ian Chin says he was.
From New Zealand, where I read my copy of May Day For Justice which stated that the judiciary has been relegated as just one of the many departments of state.
I view this as a step backwards as ipso facto it virtually demolishes the concept of the separation of powers where the legislative, the executive and the judiciary are separate but equal arms of a democratic government.
If memory serves me right, this adverse view was contained in my first written assignment that is still on call as a model answer in our law school library.
Somehow, amidst all these revelations, my decision to take a breather in a foreign country appears to be vindicated because deep down, I knew that something was amiss, although I could not at that stage define what that "something" was.
We Malaysians may take these revelations like ducks taking so much water or regard this as something worth reflecting about.
Has damage been done? If so, what do we do? Whatever our reaction, we owe it to future generations to leave this country a better one than when we found it. Anything less is a betrayal ... and future Malaysians deserve better.
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng