feed
Home arrow News arrow Legal/General News arrow Ink can be easily removed, says firm
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Ink can be easily removed, says firm PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 14 September 2011 12:37pm
©The Star (Used by permission)
by MARTIN CARVALHO and RASHVINJEET S. BEDI

PETALING JAYA: An international firm specialising in fingerprint security systems claims it has evidence to show that indelible ink used for voting may not be foolproof and that it can be easily removed with common solvents.

The Europe-based company, with 25 years of experience in over 40 countries, has carried out a reliability test on the ink with its findings to be submitted to the authorities.

In a demonstration for The Star, it was shown the indelible ink stain on the test subject's index finger was easily rubbed off in minutes using off-the-shelf stain removal solvent found in most hardware shops.

“The ink is a controlled item which contains silver nitrate and is not openly sold in the market,” a senior company spokesman said, adding that India was the main source for indelible ink.

The controversy over indelible ink is not new as its use was questioned in the Afghan presidential elections in 2004 and elections in Palestine in 2005.

“It was discovered in both elections that some voters managed to remove the ink and vote more than once,” the spokesman said.

“Indelible ink could also be easily substituted with other inks and polling stations may not be equipped with test kits to test their genuineness.”

Health concern is another factor affecting the use of the ink as it contains silver nitrate which can cause irritation.

“Its use is not permitted in Europe and the US,” he said.

The use of indelible ink was among the demands of Bersih 2.0 which described it as a simple and cost-effective means to prevent voter fraud.

In 2007, the EC decided to implement the use of indelible ink but did not do so in the 12th General Election following fears of fraud.

Election Commission chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Yusof refused to comment on the company's findings, saying that any such matter would be discussed by the Parliamentary Select Committee set up to implement electoral reforms.
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2012 Bar Council Subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2012 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2012 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2012 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Bar Council Bookshop
    Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012)
Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Your Login


We have 104 guests and 1 member online

Malaysian Bar blasts police violence

Bar council: Police brutality worst in Bersih 3.0



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
April 2012 May 2012 June 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 18 1 2 3 4 5
Week 19 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Week 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Week 22 27 28 29 30 31
Google