feed
Home arrow News arrow Legal/General News arrow Experts split over review of consent age
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Experts split over review of consent age PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 30 August 2012 08:54am
Image©The Star (Used by permission)

PETALING JAYA: Experts are divided on whether the age of 16 in cases of statutory rape should be reviewed due to children maturing at a younger age.

Lawyer Edmund Bon said maturity and their understanding of sex and consent should be considered.

“The education system needs to provide advance sex education, teach children their rights, make them more assertive and help them understand what rape is and what consent means,” he said, but declined to state if he was in favour of either increasing or reducing the age of consent from 16.

Lawyer Karpal Singh said although 16 was acceptable in cases of statutory rape, the Attorney-General could study if it was necessary to lower the age.

However, senior consultant community paediatrician in Ipoh Datuk Dr Amar Singh said people should ask themselves if they would want their daughters to have sex at age 13 or 14.

“This is not about restricting their freedom but whether they are in a position to decide for themselves when older men take advantage of them,” he said.

Suhakam commissioner James Nayagam said 16 had been recognised as the age when a teenager could recognise and be responsible for sexual relations.

“Relationships between young adults and girls, especially those below 14, are not a fair playing field because when a girl is emotionally dependent on an adult, she will be more vulnerable to having sex,” he said.

Lawyer Honey Tan said it would not be wise to reduce the age limit.

“We should look at studies regarding the impact of having sex at a very young age from the physical, psychological and emotional angles,” she said.

Tan said she was concerned that judges seemed to think that young girls of 12 and 13 could consent to having sexual intercourse when they had been “socialised” to be “respectful to their elders”.
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2013 Bar Council subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 090/2013 pertaining to the 2013 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2013 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2013 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2013 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Starting a new Practice
    If you are thinking of setting up your own law practice, click on the link above to view Bar Council's information and checklists to help you prepare for your new endeavour.
Talk on Limited Liability Partnerships (21 May 2013)
Organised by the Bar Council Professional Standards and Development Committee, this talk by Anand Raj and Wong Tat Chung will be held at 4:00 pm to 6:30 pm, at Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 21 May 2013 (Tuesday). The talk carries two CPD points. Click on the link above for more details.


Your Login


We have 64 guests online

November 2011 December 2011 January 2012
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Week 48 1 2 3 4
Week 49 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 50 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 51 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 52 26 27 28 29 30 31
Google