|
'Accused had opportunity to smuggle explosives' |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 03 September 2008 07:28pm |
|
©The
Sun (Used by permission)
by S. Tamarai Chelvi
SHAH ALAM (Sept 3, 2008): Chief Insp Azilah Hadri and Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar had
the opportunity to smuggle explosive substances, the prosecution in the
Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial submitted in the High Court today.
DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, who was replying to the defence’s submission at
the end of the prosecution’s case, said there is sufficient evidence to show
that explosive substances found at the murder scene came from the Special Action
Squad (UTK).
He said Azilah and Sirul had access to the explosive substances and the
opportunity to smuggle them out. “We submit that there was no other person from
any other security forces,” said Tun Majid.
Tun Majid also said: “No doubt there were contradictions in the evidence of
(Chief Insp) Koh (Fei Cheow) and (ASP) Zulkarnain (Samsudin) in this aspect but
should their evidence be rejected in total?” asked Tun Majid.
“I don’t deny that they have displayed a cavalier and lackadaisical attitude in
performing their duty, which warrants the court to evaluate their evidence with
utmost circumspect.”
Earlier, Tun Majid said Koh testified he saw Zulkarnain lodged a police report
in respect of the disclosure and that he did not read it. He said Zulkarnain
testified that he lodged a police report (the discovery statement).
“However, after being confonted with the original report, he said that he signed
the said report but Koh typed it. He further said that Koh typed it and when it
came to information, he dictated it to Koh,” said Tun Majid.
“In re-examination, he further explained this and he said that he made a record
in his ID in respect of the information given by Sirul in his laptop and Sirul
himself confirmed that Zulkarnain was typing something,” said Tun Majid.
Tun Majid also submitted there was no fabrication about the interview or
interrogation conducted by Zulkarnain and Koh on Nov 7, 2006, which allegedly
led to the disclosure by Sirul on Altantuya’s jewelleries.
Tun Majid said Zulkarnain testfied that both he and Koh interrogated Sirul at
2pm as instructed by DSP Gan Tack Guan. “Zulkarnain was specifically asked about
the time Gan gave instruction and his reply was at 12.30pm.
“True, in re-examination Zulkarnain said he stated it at 1.45pm in his ID
(investigation diary) because that was the time he received the instruction from
Gan. He (Zulkarnain) then said 1.45pm was the time he had commenced his task.”
“It is a contradiction no doubt but how does that amount to fabrication as
regards to the fact that the interrogation took place?” said Tun Majid.
He said Zulkarnain lodged a police report in respect of the discovery of the
jewelleries and another report in respect of the discovery statement and a
search list. (Discovery statement contains Sirul’s alleged statements.)
He said during cross examination, it was revealed that there was another report
but with several differences of some particulars.
Zulkarnain explained that it was the original report (discovery statement) he
had lodged and he realised there were mistakes and made corrections (which then
became another report).
“The prosecutions has explained in detail regarding the inconsistencies and
there is nothing suspicious about it. The fact remains that the information was
indeed given. Prosecution was not aware of the amendments made,” he added.
The hearing before judge Mohd Zaki Md Yasin continues tomorrow.
|