feed
Home arrow Committees arrow Law Reform & Special Areas arrow Roundup on Bar Council's Public Forum on "Senior Citizens' Protection : Is there a need to enact laws?"
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Roundup on Bar Council's Public Forum on "Senior Citizens' Protection : Is there a need to enact laws?" PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 14 March 2007 08:49pm

Contributed by Helen L.M. Chin

Senior Citizens' Protetcion SeminarKUALA LUMPUR, 10 March: True to the tenet of ensuring that proposed laws are legislated to serve the needs of society and move with society trends, the Law Reform and Special Areas Committee held a public forum to gather views of senior citizens and professionals involved with the welfare of the elderly.

Approximately 50 people from non-governmental organisations, retirement homes, senior citizen clubs, universities and government departments attended the forum at the Bar Council Auditorium and participated actively. However, it was sad to note that very few lawyers besides the organising committee members were present despite several announcement notices earlier.

The opening message by Yeo Yang Poh, the Chairman of Bar Council who noted that in our society nowadays, senior citizens are sometimes revered but sometimes are regarded as 'excess baggage' in some families set the mood for healthy debate when he invited participants to consider how society should go about resolving problems peculiar to aging population through formulating appropriate legislation or improving cultural values of respecting the elderly.

Dato' M. Ramachelvam, the Chairman of the Law Reform and Special Areas Committee emphasised on the importance of the subject in the light of society's needs. Participants were very keen generally and one participant professed to be touched to his soul by the eminent speakers and called for a more altruistic society. Session chairmen, Su Tiang Joo and RV Lingam were called to exercise their dexterity of thought and leadership in moderating the question and answer sessions skillfully. Needless to say, they had very good support from Lee Swee Seng who was his usual eloquent self.

Gerontologist, Prof. Madya Dr. Tengku Aizan binti Hamid of Universiti Putra Malaysia stressed that the number of older persons has increased from 1.03 million in 1991 to 1.73 million in 2005. Based on Statistics Department data, the proportion of people aged 60 years or over is expected to increase to 9.9% of the total population by 2020 as compared to 4.8% in 1960.

Emphasising that laws are essential to protect senior citizens, she pointed out that specific legislation for older persons already exist in the Philippines, Thailand, Singapore, Australia, Israel, Canada and United States.

To ensure an effective national policy for the well being of older persons, other professionals besides lawyers should be involved to achieve social inclusion rather than exclusion of the elderly in our society.

Cognisant of the family structure where both the child and the spouse would be working, Prof. Madya opined that resources on a community level be explored to support the elderly.

Welfare Department Elderly and Family Division Director, Nik Omar bin Abdul Rahman informed participants of the National Advisory and Consultative Council for Older Persons under the chairmanship of the Minister of Women, Family and Community Development for drawing up programmes to protect the elderly and improve their quality of life through subcommittees for social and recreation, health, education, training and religion, housing, research and publicity.

During question time, he disclosed that elderly persons without sources of regular income and without any offspring capable of supporting him / her is eligible to receive the "Bantuan Orang Tua" of RM200 per month from Welfare Department. Administrative delays in payment of the monthly allowance and the inadequacy of this amount in the light of rising costs for basic living were highlighted by participants and the speaker noted it for the attention of the consultative council at its next meeting on 13th March 2007.

Dr. S. Chandra Mohan a practising lawyer and former District Court Judge as member of the Tribunal for the Maintenance of Parents in Singapore enlightened forum participants on the working of the Maintenance of Parents' Act 1995 in the island state.

It places the obligation on the child / children of the elderly citizen as the first line of support instead of the state and is based on the equitable principle that a child should financially support a parent if the parent has supported him. Provisions for mediation conducted in a non-adversarial manner, in privacy and dignity are hallmarks of the system. A parent aged 60 years and over who is unable to maintain himself / herself is entitled to apply for a maintenance order or the application may be made by the Commissioner for the Maintenance of Parents or any approved organization or person in whose care the parent resides. The Maintenance Order is enforceable as District Court Orders and variation of maintenance orders as well as appeals can be filed in the High Court.

The Asian model of laws for maintenance of parents and elderly persons in India was highlighted during the forum. According to a press article in the Times of India, New Delhi on February 23, 2007 the Cabinet in India had on 22 February 2007 cleared the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens' Bill imposing a jail term of three months and a fine payable by children who refuse or fail to provide a life of dignity to their elders. It provides for offenders under this Act to lose his / her rights of inheritance for not taking care of his / her elders. The age limit for elderly parents entitled to maintenance orders is 60 years but it includes parents below the age of 60 years if they need care by their offspring due to sickness or other reasons.

Dr. Raj Karim representing SUHAKAM referred to various international plans of action including the Copenhagen Plan of Action, the UN Principles for Older Persons vide Resolution 46/91 at Geneva and the International Plan of Action on Ageing Population vide United Nations Resolution 37/51 December 1982 subscribed to by the Malaysian Government which hold that all people should have adequate economic and social provisions including the disabled and the aging population.

She emphasised that diseases associated with ageing can be very debilitating especially for women. Social problems highlighted include the loneliness experienced by elderly commonly referred to as "empty nest syndrome" when children grow up and lead their own lives or migrate from rural to urban areas and when the elderly spouse passes away. Dr. Raj asserted that whilst responsibility for the care of the elderly parent is to be on the child, the state should provide housing facilities for older people near the residence of their children, community day care centres for elderly people and opportunities for willing and capable older persons to participate in the community and community clubs. In New Zealand and Japan, there is no compulsory retirement age and there is a Register of Volunteers of Older Persons. Other provisions recommended by SUHAKAM are the imposition of more severe sentences by court for offenders guilty of abusing or assaulting older persons and that the Government adopts the tribunal approach in Singapore for maintenance of parents and / or the Australian model as well. Her final observation was on the practice in Samoa where community and family support is so strong that legislation is not required. Being devoted Christians predominantly, the inhabitants of Samoa are faithful in observing a regular family prayer time and adopting a healthy lifestyle.

Husain b. Haji Anjang Pulau, Secretary General of the Government Pensioners' Association lamented the general indifference amongst the general public to problems of senior citizens in the family structure and in daily activities. Moral training to inculcate respect for the elderly is felt to be urgently needed. To protect senior citizens, he surmised that specific legislation and amendments to existing legislation are required urgently. He referred to the Pensions Act 1980 (Act 227) Section 22(1) where the maximum pension is capped at half of last drawn salary amongst several other provisions.

Participants were chagrined when it was pointed out that ministers' pensions were based on their full salaries for each position held during his/her term of office after five years of service and that in Sri Lanka, retirees' pensions are based on the last drawn salaries.

Adjunct Professor Puan Mehrun Siraj of International Islamic Universiti Malaysia held a unique view when she asserted that poor parenting is the cause of the failure of children to care for their elderly parents. As such, she advocates that training for filial piety in children has to start from young in the family and in the community through the media. However she feels that maintenance of the elderly should be a family responsibility and failing that, the state should shoulder the task of providing for the elderly. For implementing legislation relating to maintenance of senior citizens, many programmes to promote understanding of the statutory responsibility and other provisions involves are important. In order to adopt the Singapore tribunal approach, Malaysia needs to have sufficient manpower trained in family mediation techniques and counseling practices. She stressed that the state should organize a nationwide survey to obtain an overall view of society's needs in this respect.

Other demands requested by participants related to automatic entitlement to full medical benefits, 50% discount on air travel, emphasis on filial piety in religious education through experiential learning and not ritualistic memorising and increase in the maximum age limit by commercial banks for housing loan applications to 75 years as is practised by Citibank and speedier implementation of statutory provisions to protect senior citizens.

In closing the forum, Ramachelvam thanked the participants and gave an assurance that the Law Reform and Special Areas Committee would be studying the deliberations and submit a memorandum to the Government of Malaysia in due course.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2012 Bar Council Subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2012 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2012 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2012 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Bar Council Bookshop
    Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012)
Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Your Login


We have 212 guests and 5 members online

Malaysian Bar blasts police violence

Bar council: Police brutality worst in Bersih 3.0



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
Google