feed
Home
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
HRC Responds: Glad for Tan, cautious optimism for the future PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 23 May 2008 11:22am

Contributed by the Human Rights Committee

Tan Ean Huang @ Siti Fatimah Tan AbdullahThe Committee refers to The Sun’s report on 8 May 2008 entitled “Convert allowed to leave Islam”. We are glad that Tan Ean Huang @ Siti Fatimah Tan Abdullah is now able to profess and practise her Buddhist faith in peace.

The law on freedom of religion

Under our Federal Constitution and international human rights law, freedom of thought, conscience and religion cannot be restricted in the sense that the State cannot interfere with what is inside one’s mind or heart. Article 11(1) of the Federal Constitution guarantees that “every person has the right to profess and practise his religion”. This right is given to “every person” both Muslim and non-Muslim.

Our Constitution envisages only two situations where freedom of religion may be curtailed:

• Under Article 11(4), the right to propagate a religion amongst “persons professing the religion of Islam” may be controlled by State law or by Parliament (in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya).

• Under Article 11(5), the guarantee of freedom of religion “does not authorise any act contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality”.

International human rights law is in a sense even stricter. It too does not permit restrictions on the freedom of thought, conscience or belief per se. There is only one permissible restriction, contained in Article 18(3) of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights 1966 which provides that the manifestation of religious belief “may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others”.

Requirement to obtain the Syariah Court’s permission/consent contrary to law and human rights?

The requirement for Tan Ean Huang to obtain permission or consent from the Syariah Court as an adjudicating body - which appears to stand as an external “third-party” to control or manage her personal or private beliefs - in order that she may profess and practise her religion of choice, appears to be an unreasonable fetter on her rights as guaranteed by the Federal Constitution and international human rights law.

As reported, Tan stated that she did not profess and practise the religion of Islam but remained a Buddhist subsequent to her conversion. Given this, there is the unresolved primary issue of whether the Syariah High Court had jurisdiction over Tan.

The Federal Court in Latifah bte Md Zin’s case makes it clear that Syariah courts are only vested with jurisdiction over matters expressly granted to them by State legislative assemblies. In Subashini’s case, the Federal Court was unanimous in holding that Syariah courts have no jurisdiction over persons who do not profess Islam as their religion.

It is reiterated that the Federal Constitution grants the appropriate State legislative assembly the power to create Syariah courts, but such courts are only permitted to have jurisdiction over “persons professing the religion of Islam”. If Tan Ean Huang did not profess Islam as her religion when she made the application to the Syariah Court (as she says she professed Buddhism), it is doubtful if the Syariah Court could validly exercise jurisdiction over her.

The Committee also cautions against the use of any form of coercion, duress, compulsion or threat to compel/discourage a person against/from renouncing a religion even if the same take the form or guise of rehabilitative measures or guidance/support techniques. Such actions violate the human rights principles of religious freedom.

Urgent reforms necessary for lasting solutions

Tan Ean Huang should now be allowed to live in peace in her chosen religion.

However, for the benefit of others in her situation, it is imperative that State governments and the Federal Government urgently review and revise our Syariah administrative laws, which are laws enacted by State legislative assemblies and the Federal Parliament, in order to ensure that the same comply with constitutional guarantees and international human rights norms on freedom of religion.

The Committee believes that urgent action is necessary to clarify our laws so that there is some certainty for people caught in these situations. As always, we are able and willing to assist in this regard.

Dated this 22nd day of May 2008
Human Rights Committee
Bar Council

Comments (1)Add Comment
siti fatimah Tan abdullah
written by Catherine Choong Hor Kiow, Monday, May 26 2008 02:17 pm

Where can we get a copy of the judgment? And also Nyonya Tahir's judgment.

Thanks.
Catherine Choong Hor Kiow


Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2013 Bar Council subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 090/2013 pertaining to the 2013 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2013 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2013 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2013 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Starting a new Practice
    If you are thinking of setting up your own law practice, click on the link above to view Bar Council's information and checklists to help you prepare for your new endeavour.
MSLSSL and MCLJ Conference on Employment and Labour Laws 2013 (30 May 2013)
Organised by the Malaysian Society for Labour and Social Security Law and Malaysian Current Law Journal, this conference entitled “Current Issues on Employment and Labour Laws” will be held at 8:30 am to 6:00 pm, at Grand Hyatt Kuala Lumpur, on 30 May 2013 (Thursday). The conference carries six CPD points. Click on the link above for more details.


Your Login


We have 41 guests online

June 2011 July 2011 August 2011
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Week 26 1 2 3
Week 27 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week 28 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Week 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Week 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Google