The restriction in the Government Proceedings Act on “public officers” using private lawyers only with the permission of the Attorney General does not apply to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Perak defending a suit brought against him in his capacity as Speaker. Thus, the Ipoh High Court decision to bar Tommy Thomas and others from acting for Speaker Sivakumar is, with respect, wrong.
It appears that Ipoh High Court Judicial Commissioner Yang Arif Tuan Ridwan bin Ibrahim has ruled that private lawyers cannot appear on behalf of Speaker of the Perak State Assembly Sivakumar in the litigation against him brought by UMNO Assemblypersons because of the Government Proceedings Act 1956.
This decision is of particular interest to those concerned with the right of litigants to have an advocate to champion his cause in Court without fear or favour. Regrettably, and with respect, it appears that this decision does not seem to be in line with the provisions of the Government Proceedings Act 1956 read together with the Federal Constitution.
Section 24(3) of the Government Proceedings Act 1956 seems to suggest that the State Legal Adviser must retain advocates and solicitors in order to act on behalf of the “State government” or “State officers” in “civil proceedings by or against the Government of a State or a State officer”. This follows on from sections 24(1) and (2) which provide that law officers (meaning lawyers from the Attorney General’s Chambers) “may” act on behalf of “public officers” who are sued by virtue of his office.
Thus, the law allows for the Attorney General’s Chambers to act or to appoint private lawyers to act for cases against public officers.
The term “public officer” is not defined in the Government Proceedings Act 1956. The Interpretation Act has the following definitions:-
“public office” means an office in any of the public services;
“public officer” means a person lawfully holding, acting in or exercising the functions of a public office;
“public services” means the public services mentioned in Article 132 (1) of the Federal Constitution;
Article 132(1) of the Federal Constitution lists out several public services such as the armed forces, the judicial and legal services, the police service and the general public service. In a nutshell, the public services are what is commonly called government service or civil service.
But Article 132(3)(b) is instructive. It categorically states that “the public service shall not be taken to comprise” the Speakers of Parliament and the Legislative Assemblies of the State.
Hence, it appears that the restriction in the Government Proceedings Act on public officers using private lawyers only with the permission of the Attorney General does not apply to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Perak defending a suit brought against him in his capacity as Speaker.
Thus, the Ipoh High Court decision to bar Tommy Thomas and others from acting for Speaker Sivakumar is, with respect, wrong.
Let it stays within the four corner of the wall ... written by Tan Chun Ming,
Tuesday, March 03 2009 09:30 pm
Court's Jurisdictions: Bradlaugh v Gossett (1884) 21 QBD 271-Courts have no jurisdiction to pass upon any conduct that forms part of proceedings in Parliament.
Lim Cho Hock v Speaker, Perak Legislative Assembly [1979] 2 MLJ 85 at page 88: "Under the lex et consuetudo parliament, the Assembly has control over its proceedings, procedure and members and may decide questions as to their qualifications and disqualification."
In McDonald v Cain [1963] VLR 411: Gavan Duffy J observed:
"There is no doubt that the courts will not interfere with the Council's management of its business within the four walls of Parliament even if it appears that some legal right has been interfered with."
F.C. O'Bryan J. said:
"a thing which is plainly outside their jurisdiction. It is ancient and well-established law that what is said and done within the walls of Parliament cannot be inquired into in a court of law."
the Speaker's role: Fan Yew Teng v. Government of Malaysia [1976] 2 MLJ 262: "...Clifton Brown said on his re-election as Speaker in 1945, 'As Speaker, I am not the Government's man, nor the Opposition's man. I am the House of Commons' man and, I believe, above all, the back-benchers' man."
My modification: "As a Speaker, one is not the Government's man, nor the Opposition's man. One is a man of conscience who believe above all, the spirit that this House represents".
Tan Chun Ming
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
2012 Hotel Corporate Rates Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
Talk on Intellectual Property Law (10 Feb 2012) Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, the talk on “Intellectual Property Law” will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 10 Feb 2012 (Friday). The talk will feature Bahari Yeow Tien Hong. Click on the link above for more details.
The Case of the Missing Penang Lawyer: Charity Treasure Hunt 2012 (12 Feb 2012) Organised by the Penang Bar Committee Social Subcommittee in aid of the National Autism Society of Malaysia (NASOM), this event will take place at Straits Quay, Penang, on 12 Feb 2012 (Sunday). Deadline for registration is 6 Feb 2012 (Monday). Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings (21 Feb 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, the seminar on “The Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings”, featuring Sanjeev Kumar Rasiah, will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 21 Feb 2012 (Tuesday). Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Conveyancing (24 Feb 2012) Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, this seminar featuring Jeremiah R Gurusamy will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 24 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Mediation Skills Training Course (29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012) Organised by Bar Council, the Mediation Skills Training Course will take place at 8:30 am to 5:30 pm, at Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012 (Wednesday to Sunday). Deadline for registration and payment is 17 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Talk on “Land Fraud: An Australian Perspective” (13 Mar 2012) Organised by IGIL, GSGSG and UUM COLGIS, this free talk featuring Quintin George Rozario of Delta Law, Brisbane, Australia, will take place at 9:00 am, at Dewan Seminar A, Pusat Konvensyen, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, on 13 Mar 2012 (Tuesday). To RSVP, contact Mr Abutt (04-928 4397; abutt@uum.edu.my).
News 
©
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Circular No 019/2012: Change of Address for Pejabat Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Wilayah Persekutuan
Court's Jurisdictions:
Bradlaugh v Gossett (1884) 21 QBD 271-Courts have no jurisdiction to pass upon any conduct that forms part of proceedings in Parliament.
Lim Cho Hock v Speaker, Perak Legislative Assembly [1979] 2 MLJ 85 at page 88:
"Under the lex et consuetudo parliament, the Assembly has control over its proceedings, procedure and members and may decide questions as to their qualifications and disqualification."
In McDonald v Cain [1963] VLR 411:
Gavan Duffy J observed:
"There is no doubt that the courts will not interfere with the Council's management of its business within the four walls of Parliament even if it appears that some legal right has been interfered with."
F.C. O'Bryan J. said:
"a thing which is plainly outside their jurisdiction. It is ancient and well-established law that what is said and done within the walls of Parliament cannot be inquired into in a court of law."
the Speaker's role:
Fan Yew Teng v. Government of Malaysia [1976] 2 MLJ 262:
"...Clifton Brown said on his re-election as Speaker in 1945, 'As Speaker, I am not the Government's man, nor the Opposition's man. I am the House of Commons' man and, I believe, above all, the back-benchers' man."
My modification: "As a Speaker, one is not the Government's man, nor the Opposition's man. One is a man of conscience who believe above all, the spirit that this House represents".
Tan Chun Ming