feed
Home arrow News arrow General Opinions/Comments arrow Editorial: Second thoughts
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Editorial: Second thoughts PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 03 March 2009 10:01am

©New Straits Times (Used by permission)

ON matters as different as highway tolls and religious terminology, the dynamics of decision-making are perforce radically different.

The former is informed by policy and contractual obligations; the latter is an attempt at a compromise that safeguards peoples' sensitivities while not constraining religious freedom. Yet, these two instances have been conflated in recent days into further evidence of a dithering administration, uncertain of itself and at the mercy of gusting public opinion.

Works Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Zin Mohamed's announcement last Thursday of raised tolls on five highways, having provoked a chorus of objections from road users, consumers and, predictably, the opposition, was rescinded within 24 hours -- first in the form of a postponement till the end of the year, and subsequently, according to Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, "indefinitely". Najib's terse allusion to the revocation, costing taxpayers RM287 million in compensation payments to the concessionaires involved, fell largely on deaf ears -- it is in the nature of consumers to be far more concerned with what they pay out of their own pockets than what the government has to do with their tax ringgit.

Over the matter of the use, or otherwise, of the sacred name "Allah" in non-Islamic contexts, the back-and-forth is even more distressing. What appears to be reigning at the present stage of this continuing issue is confusion. The gazetting on Feb 16 of a 1986 cabinet decision on this matter permitted a locally published Christian journal to continue using the word, on condition that the publication prominently display on its cover a message specifying that it was for Christians only. It should be noted that the journal in question persisted with its suit on the matter, accepting the gazetted dispensation but pressing on with its case for unrestricted publication in the national language as well. The Malaysian Islamic Dakwah Foundation responded in protest that the publication should not be allowed to use the word in question until the courts decide these matters. On that basis, the government has rescinded the gazette in question.

No matter how all this plays out, there's no doubt such "flip-flop" decision-making fatally undermines public faith in the clarity and resoluteness of those charged with steering the ship of state through the present stormy seas of politics and the jagged shoals of a receding economy. When decisions can be made and revoked like this, the strength of any decision is compromised by the obvious weakness of conviction behind it.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Talk on Intellectual Property Law (10 Feb 2012)
Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, the talk on “Intellectual Property Law” will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 10 Feb 2012 (Friday). The talk will feature Bahari Yeow Tien Hong. Click on the link above for more details.
Your Login


We have 227 guests online

Teoh Beng Hock's family gets leave to appeal

Kamal Hisham Ja'afar



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View Full Calendar
January 2012 February 2012 March 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 5 1 2 3 4
Week 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 9 26 27 28 29
Google