Charles Hector
User
Junior Forumer
| Posts: 160 |   |
|
Re:Malaysian Bar must protest what is being done to HR lawyer M. Ravi - 2008/11/27 03:24
Maybe the HR Committee could give us a write-up highlighting the different kinds 0f "harassment" and "persecution" being faced by M Ravi.
This lawyer is in Singapore - and his Bar has also participated in the 'harassment'.
If he was in Malaysia, I am certain that the Malaysian Bar will be out there with him in solidarity.
Just came across an IPS Report on this person, which I would like to share:-
KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 25 (IPS) - Singapore's embattled human rights lawyer and leading anti-death penalty campaigner, Ravi Madasamy, intends to defend his reputation ”all the way” to the highest courts after being released on bail for allegedly causing a disturbance at a mosque.
On Aug 11, a Singapore judge ordered Ravi to be examined by the Institute of Mental Health after police arrested him on charges of harassment and causing a public disturbance during a prayer session.
Ravi, 40, who was discharged from the hospital earlier this month, remains on bail facing a possible three-year prison sentence, if found guilty.
Ravi has strenuously denied the charges and dismissed prosecution suggestions about his mental health. He represented himself in court as no lawyer in Singapore was prepared to take up his case.
Only a small group of committed local rights activists have rallied to his defence. The country's Law Society, which took him to court for allegedly disrespecting a judge, leading to a one-year practicing suspension in 2007, has distanced itself from the case.
”I am saddened but I will continue my mission,” Ravi told IPS. ”The environment is increasingly tough and dangerous.”
Charles Hector, a prominent Malaysian human rights lawyer, described Ravi as ”a victim of state repression”.
”The Malaysian Bar is closely monitoring his plight,” Hector told IPS. ”He is a defender of human rights and we are very concerned. We are taking up his victimisation internationally.
”The Singapore authorities should immediately end the persecution and respect Ravi's right to free expression and advocacy to end mandatory death penalty.”
Ravi has led a virtually one-man international campaign to save death row prisoners facing execution by hanging, mostly for drug trafficking in Singapore.
He has also fought, in the courts and outside, to defend dissidents, persecuted opposition politicians, lawmakers and human rights activists.
As a result he has been vilified and severely criticised by Singapore's government-controlled mainstream media and often accused of being a publicity seeker.
”I face numerous other problems arising out of my activism,” Ravi told IPS.
”With all the happenings I came under tremendous pressure.
”Because of the mounting problems my pace has slackened but my resolve is the same. I will press on to enlighten Singaporeans on the horrors of the death penalty.
”People should know that mandatory death penalty [impelling judges to sentence people to death in capital convictions] is a step backwards into a barbaric era. We must campaign and people should want to end it.”
Ravi, who is also an author and manager of the anti-death penalty website http://hungatdawn.blogspot.com/ first gained prominence in mid-2005 for trying to save death row inmate Shanmugam Murugesu, who was sentenced to death for possession of 1 kg of marijuana.
Murugesu, 38, a former military veteran and Singaporean civil servant, was arrested in August 2003 for carrying six packets of marijuana in his bags when returning home from Malaysia.
Under Singapore law, the death penalty is mandatory for possession of 500 gm of marijuana and 2 gm of heroin.
Before Murugesu's execution on May 13, Ravi and a few supporters organised a three-hour vigil at a hall in the Furama Hotel.
”It was the first time citizens had organised to speak against the arbitrary, biased and discriminatory death penalty law,” Ravi said. ”It was an eye opener for us all.”
In 2004, Singapore, with a population of 4.3 million, had the highest per capita rate of state executions in the world, according to Amnesty International.
From then on, Ravi represented other death row inmates in court. He also travelled the world speaking out against state repression and the mandatory death penalty in Singapore.
A colleague, requesting strict confidentiality, said police placed Ravi under strict surveillance.
”They followed him, took photographs and filed reports,” he told IPS. ”The relentless scrutiny caused Ravi tremendous personal and professional stress.”
Although on bail, Ravi has resumed practicing law until his trial date is set.
Last year, Singapore carried out two executions and sentenced two people to death, according to Amnesty.
|
Jurisk Dec 08
