Comments for Cops record lawyer’s statement over PI’s declarations at http://www.malaysianbar.org.my , comment 0 to 1 out of 1 comments http://www.malaysianbar.org.my Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:24:16 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/bar_news/berita_badan_peguam/cops_record_lawyers_statement_over_pis_declarations.html#pc_7232 This report disturbs me. I accompanied my client [another lawyer] to the same place in respect of probably the same investigation. We were with a different officer who was very professional and courteous throughout. I explained to the officer the scope of professional ethics and what a lawyer coould or could not reveal vis-a-vis his dealings with his client and his instructions. The officer fully understood and recognised the limitations placed upon a lawyer by his professional role and the recording of the statement went smoothly. My client and I saw nothing to complain about. Just so that we understand the entire picture, merely being asked to come in for a statement is not harrasment. And one cannot refuse to go in to give a statement on the grounds that one is a lawyer. There is no such immunity or protection. It is only what happens during the recording of the statement that can or may amount to harrasment. Perhaps different investigating officers approach the problem differently but lawyers too have to appreciate the degree and scope of privilege they can claim in respect of their dealings with their clients and this limitation must be carefully explained to the investigating officer. The lawyer must then stand firm. Any officer demanding a breach of the privilege rule must of course be reported. Manjeet Singh Dhillon - Manjeet Singh Dhillon Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:39:13 +0100