<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Bala could face perjury charge</title>
		<description>Comments for Bala could face perjury charge at http://www.malaysianbar.org.my , comment 0 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.malaysianbar.org.my</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:43:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>The alleged text message from the DPM</title>
			<link>http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/general_news/bala_could_face_perjury_charge.html#pc_7179</link>
			<description>There is at least one aspect of Bala's first statutory declaration which can be corroborated: the &quot;be cool&quot; text message which Razak Baginda supposedly received from the DPM. Bala said in the first (and now recanted) statutory declaration that Baginda showed the message to both Bala and Baginda's lawyer, when the three of them were at the lawyer's office. I suppose the lawyer can confirm whether such a text message was indeed shown by Baginda.

Surely Baginda had waived his solicitor-client privilege if he showed the message to Bala as well. It is arguable whether the communication between Baginda and his lawyer (at that time) was intended to be confidential if it was made in the presence of Bala.

Andrew Teh Leng Guan - Andrew Teh Leng Guan</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
