<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Nazri: Bar Council should focus on its own problems</title>
		<description>Comments for Nazri: Bar Council should focus on its own problems at http://www.malaysianbar.org.my , comment 0 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.malaysianbar.org.my</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:11:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>100% support</title>
			<link>http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/bar_news/berita_badan_peguam/nazri_bar_council_should_focus_on_its_own_problems.html#pc_5219</link>
			<description>&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Bar members are fully supported the President's action. It is the Minister concerned that should read our Constitution.

Freedom pf speech and Freedom of Assembly are enshrined in our Constitution. What is Police Act? Can it override our Constitution? 

But anyway, the Minister either don't know how to interpret the Constitution or tried to be ignorance. 

Every time when one group trying to defend the rights of the people, the Minister will call them to form political party. 

The Bar has been empower under the LPA to safeguard the interest of the people in respect of legal matters which include human rights. Ask the Minister to amend the Act first before he ask us to shut up.

Defending the innocent and discriminated citizen is our duties. Unless the Government of the day intends to take it away from us. Then there won't be any lawyer.

Please tell the Minister that the world is looking at how the Government is going to handle the situation.

Tan Pean Khoon - Tan Pean Khoon</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:42:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Which is which?</title>
			<link>http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/bar_news/berita_badan_peguam/nazri_bar_council_should_focus_on_its_own_problems.html#pc_5207</link>
			<description>&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Haha. Now Nazri says &quot;Ambiga should have known better than to issue such criticisms of police action as the responsibility of interpreting the law belonged to the courts.&quot;. Yesterday he said something else. One day he says the police interprets the law, next day he says the court does it. Which is which? Better make up his mind otherwise one will look very stupid saying different things on different days. Ini macam main tikam la. Hari ini kalau tak kena, esok aku tikam yang lain pulak, tengok dapat tak. Haha. Real joke.

Nazri further said &quot;She should not interpret the law. I would like to ask her to read the Police Act which leaves the responsibility for making decisions on whether to allow an assembly within the ambit of the police, not the Bar Council.&quot; I wonder who really needs to sit down to read everything to ensure one doesnt say one thing today &amp; another tomorrow. Tolong la. Firstly, get all of what you want to say sorted out first then only speak, otherwise you seem to be shooting yourself in the foot.

The General Election results have never been disputed? It has been perfect all these while? Sampai pergi mahkamah pun ada YB so dont go trying to cloud the minds of members of the public. This is how he starts throwing it back at us when shit has happened, the whole world is watching, he starts painting a bad picture of the Bar to defend and retaliate. F*&amp;^%$g bare defence la YB!

On another note YB, for discussion purposes, if the Bar Council ever does start a political party, you guys wont be winning seats that easily la. Be assured..)

Carpe diem,

Lim Yeeu Ren - Lim Yeeu Ren</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:57:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

