feed
Home arrow News arrow Bar News/Berita Badan Peguam arrow The unwritten judgments: Former High Court judge yet to submit in 33 cases
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
The unwritten judgments: Former High Court judge yet to submit in 33 cases PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 23 August 2007 08:22am

Death Row prisoners©New Straits Times (Used by permission)
by V. Anbalagan

KUALA LUMPUR:
The Court of Appeal registry’s records revealed that a former High Court judge did not write grounds of judgment in 33 criminal and civil cases.

The backlog included three criminal cases in Seremban which carried the death penalty.

The judge presided over the cases while serving at the High Court there five years ago.

The rest are civil cases in which he made rulings while there and in Kuala Lumpur between 1999 and 2002.

It is understood that the litigants in all 33 cases had filed notices of appeal against decisions by the judge who is now sitting in the Federal Court.

Checks with lawyers representing the accused in the three criminal cases revealed that they were still awaiting written grounds to file the memorandum of appeal to the Court of Appeal.

In one case, the Attorney-General’s Chambers is also awaiting the written judgment as it intends to cross appeal.

The New Straits Times had on July 23 revealed that the judge had not provided written grounds of judgment in at least 30 criminal and civil cases.

CJ disputed allegations that he had erred

On Aug 16, it was reported that two men were languishing on Death Row in Kajang prison because the judge who convicted them at the High Court in Seremban had not provided grounds of judgment.

Another person was also ordered by the same judge to be held at the Sungai Buloh prison at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan on grounds of insanity.

On Tuesday, Chief Justice of the Federal Court Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim disputed allegations that he had erred in promoting judicial officers who had not written judgments. He had also asked for proof that he had elevated undeserving judges.

Meanwhile, lawyer Karpal Singh questioned the basis on which Ahmad Fairuz had promoted former High Court judge Tengku Baharuddin Shah Tengku Mahmud to the Court of Appeal.

"A delay of nine years and three months with the grounds of judgment not supplied is more cause for Ahmad Fairuz to spring into action" he said.

On Monday, former fish and vegetable vendor Baha Jambol who is on Death Row for dadah trafficking, filed an action in the Court of Appeal to free him or set aside the conviction of the High Court. Tengku Baharuddin had sentenced Baha to death on April 26, 1998.

Karpal also urged acting Court of Appeal president Datuk Alauddin Mohd Sheriff to review all pending appeals where there had been a delay in delivering grounds of judgment. This will help expedite submissions of the written judgments.

Lawyer Baljit Singh Siddhu said there should be a law to compel judicial officers, including those from subordinate courts, to provide written grounds of judgment within a specific period of time.

"Now, we only have the chief justice’s circular which is not legally binding on judicial officers," he said.

Comments (6)Add Comment
er, pardon my ignorance as a lawyer
written by Alex Tan Ken Seng, Thursday, August 23 2007 10:33 am

Can someone tell us readers who that judge is?

Alex Tan Ken Seng

Show The Proof
written by Neo Lok Tian, Thursday, August 23 2007 11:21 am

Since the CJ has disputed the allegation that he has promoted judicial officers that have not written their judgments, it is best that the proof (if indeed the allegation is true) be forwarded to him. Glad to note that the Bar Council is already doing a survey on this.

By the way, Alex, it is not that difficult to find out which Federal Court Judge was sitting in the Seremban High Court few years ago.

Neo Lok Tian

So near yet so far...
written by Shim Wai Loon, Thursday, August 23 2007 12:27 pm

Finally we have the formal records of the Court to 'prove the allegations' to the CJ.

What we need the next is another black & white to reveal who that particular judge is, I am sure that is not difficult at all but just a matter of time for the shield to totally collapse, then the identity of the judge will be nakedly exposed to the public.

Just wonder once the name is out, how would the CJ react to 'ensure justice is served'...

Shim Wai Loon

BETTER THAN METAPHORICAL WHEEL FOUND?
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Thursday, August 23 2007 02:04 pm

My dear Wai Loon

The records may be wrong, you know. Remember there was no record of the Mongolian beauties coming into Malaysia. At least that was what was testified in Court. Significantly, it was not challenged.

So we must rely on what the CJ says, until proven otherwise. After all, the CJ is not an ordinary person, but a highly paid judicial officer of the land.

Lok Tian

Where did you get the impression that the Bar Council is conducting a survey? Mana dia?

... and fellow lawyers

We now have the powers-that-be, however transcient their hold onto power, telling us that we are going for a hybrid system. It seems that the present system is not good enough. Maybe, they have found something better than the metaphorical wheel.

Stephen Tan Ban Cheng

Survey Among Members
written by Neo Lok Tian, Thursday, August 23 2007 02:36 pm

Dear Stephen,

I received a circular via e-mail from the Bar Council on the survey yesterday .

Neo Lok Tian

THANKS, LOK TIAN!
written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Thursday, August 23 2007 04:51 pm

My dear Lok Tian

Thank you. I have not had the time to go through so many of our circulars.

I must congratulate the Bar Council for taking this initiative. At least, we lawyers will then not complain that we are alienated from the Bar Council. If any such complaints should surface, then it will have no basis.

God bless our country.

Stephen Tan Ban Cheng


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
7th LAWASIA Labour Law Conference, Hong Kong (17-18 Sept)
Registration is now open. Visit the Conference official website at http://lawasia.asn.au/labour_law_conference_2010 for more details.
Username Password
Remember Me | Register | Lost Password?

We have 236 guests and 5 members online

Rakyat Service Advertisement 5 @ MyConstitution PerlembagaanKu


Rakyat Service Advertisement 4 @ MyConstitution PerlembagaanKu




show last 4hrs - 24hrs
August 2010 September 2010 October 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 35 1 2 3 4
Week 36 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 37 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 38 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 39 26 27 28 29 30
Google