feed
Home arrow News arrow Bar News/Berita Badan Peguam arrow Strong backing for Bar Council's call
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Strong backing for Bar Council's call PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 19 August 2006 06:50pm

© Malaysiakini (Used by permission)
by Alvin Yap

Yeo Yang PohThe Bar Council has received strong backing for its call to probe the 1988 judicial crisis which saw the Supreme Court compromised by then prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s sacking of Lord President Salleh Abbas and other top judges.

Earlier this week, the Bar Council - which represents the country’s 12,000 lawyers - urged the government to reopen investigations into events that led to Malaysia’s darkest hours in judicial history.

In 1988, Mahathir had Salleh tried in a special tribunal on charges of misconduct when the former chief judge questioned the government’s constitutional amendments which seriously erode the powers of the judiciary.

Two of five Supreme Court judges - George Seah and Wan Sulaiman - who had ruled that the tribunal was convened unconstitutionally were sacked along with Salleh.

Legal experts have generally agreed that the judiciary had become weaker and more susceptible to government interference after the controversial sackings.

The judiciary is considered as one of the three pillars of democracy, together with the legislative (parliament) and executive (government).

Former Court of Appeal judge Shaik Daud Md Ismail agreed that the government should review the 18-year-old case.

“They have to restore confidence in the judiciary. I think this might bring about more transparency in the government,” he told malaysiakini.

Shaikh Daud also said that his fellow senior judges who were sacked from the bench during the judicial crisis would be able to finally obtain justice if investigations into the case are reopened.

Bar Council president Yeo Yang Poh said his call for a probe into the 1988 judicial crisis was prompted by Mahathir’s incessant demands for the government to be transparent and to declassify certain documents.

“These discussions are bringing up issues of freedom of information and freedom of speech, and the independent investigations of corruption,” said Yeo.

“The council regards the 1988 judicial crisis as the turning point in the erosion of an independent judiciary in a functioning democracy.”

Nothing to hide

Anti-corruption group Transparency International (Malaysia) president Ramon Navaratnam also backed Bar Council’s call for a probe into the judicial crisis.

“The law fraternity is concerned about the (relative) lack of quality and integrity in the judiciary,” he said.

He added that the present administration should be open to setting up an independent commission to review the 18-year-old case.

“There is nothing to hide, so why avoid the opportunity to be transparent?” said Navaratnam.

He added that Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had vowed to make the fight against corruption the central plank of his administration.

“It is in the government’s best interest to be transparent, or else they will lose the people’s votes,” Navaratnam concluded.

Former Internal Security Act detainee, social activist and educationalist Kua Kia Soong disagreed with certain parties who argued that the two-decade-old issue “should not be reopened”.

He lamented that the country had paid a heavy price from Mahathir’s interference into the judiciary.

“It was a serious assault on the judiciary, and the society still suffers to this day.”

In 1987, Kua was detained under the ISA during Operation Lallang when Mahathir cracked down on opposition leaders, social activists and other dissidents.

It was the overturning of a case involving some ISA detainees by the Supreme Court - then the country’s highest court, now renamed Federal Court - that had angered Mahathir.

He later introduced controversial amendments in Parliament which virtually stripped away the powers of the court to review ISA detentions.

Former Suhakam commissioner Prof Hamdan Adnan also gave his thumb-up to the Bar Council’s call.

The ex-human rights commissioner said that any contribution to improve the judiciary should be supported by all parties.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2012 Bar Council Subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2012 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2012 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2012 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Bar Council Bookshop
    Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012)
Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Your Login


We have 231 guests and 3 members online

Malaysian Bar blasts police violence

Bar council: Police brutality worst in Bersih 3.0



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
Google