Talk on Intellectual Property Law (10 Feb 2012)Organised by the Selangor Bar Committee, the talk on “Intellectual Property Law” will take place at 5:00 pm, at the Selangor Bar Committee Auditorium, on 10 Feb 2012 (Friday). The talk will feature Bahari Yeow Tien Hong. Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings (21 Feb 2012)Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, the seminar on “The Fundamentals of Bankruptcy Proceedings”, featuring Sanjeev Kumar Rasiah, will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 21 Feb 2012 (Tuesday). Click on the link above for more details.
Seminar on the Fundamentals of Conveyancing (24 Feb 2012)Organised by the Kuala Lumpur Bar Professional Development Committee, this seminar featuring Jeremiah R Gurusamy will take place at 3:00 pm, at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Auditorium, on 24 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Mediation Skills Training Course (29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012)Organised by Bar Council, the Mediation Skills Training Course will take place at 8:30 am to 5:30 pm, at Raja Aziz Addruse Auditorium, Bar Council, on 29 Feb to 4 Mar 2012 (Wednesday to Sunday). Deadline for registration and payment is
17 Feb 2012 (Friday). Click on the link above for more details.
Talk on “Land Fraud: An Australian Perspective” (13 Mar 2012)
Organised by IGIL, GSGSG and UUM COLGIS, this free talk featuring Quintin George Rozario of Delta Law, Brisbane, Australia, will take place at 9:00 am, at Dewan Seminar A, Pusat Konvensyen, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, on 13 Mar 2012 (Tuesday). To RSVP, contact Mr Abutt (04-928 4397; abutt@uum.edu.my).
News 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Circular No 021/2012: Application to State Authority for Consent to Transfer Properties
There is no basis for the issuance of such an order unless the ACA has either technical evidence casting doubt on the authenticity of the tape or a recorded statement from Lingam stating that the tape is a fabrication and a recorded statement from the CJ saying that conversation never took place with him. THIS MUST BE DONE FIRST. Maybe the SOURCE should follow the rest and go into hiding UNTIL THESE STEPS ARE DONE FIRST, so that the risk of fabrication of evidence is reduced should the parties involved IF THEY ARE GUILTY , try to FABRICATE and Manufacture a story using information in the SOURCES STATEMENT. What about the panel of inquiry, does the source go there first or ACA? THE TECHNICAL AUTHENTICITY MUST BE ESTABLISED FIRST. WHY DONT THEY AS FOR THE FBI's help like in the NURIN case. THE ORDER should be challenged in court as it seems to be an unreasonable exercise of a statutory power as the basis for calling the source may not have been establised with crucial statements not taken beforehand.
Derek John Fernandez