feed
Home arrow News arrow Bar News/Berita Badan Peguam arrow Report invalid due to absence of Commissioners' signatures, Court told
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
  • Malaysian Bar Web Ads
Report invalid due to absence of Commissioners' signatures, Court told PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:17pm

Report invalid due to absence of Commissioners' signatures, Court told Lingam: 2 panel members biased

©Bernama (Used by permission)

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 27 (Bernama) -- The Royal Commission of Inquiry report which rendered the Lingam video clip authentic and recommended action against six individuals for misconduct is invalid, said lawyer Datuk V. K. Lingam.

He said the invalidity of the report was due to the absence of signatures of the five commissioners who sat in the proceeding.

Lingam, who represented himself at the High Court (Appellate and Special Powers Division) proceeding today, seeking leave to review the commission's findings, said each of the commissioners were statutory-bound under the Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950 to sign the report to give it a legal validity and effect.

"In the absence of the signatures of the five commissioners who sat and constituted the commission, the commission report is null and void," he added.

The commissioners were chairman Tan Sri Haidar Mohd Noor, former chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Amar Steve Shim Lip Kiong, retired court of appeal judge Datuk Mahadev Shankar, former solicitor-general Puan Sri Zaitun Zawiyah Puteh and Professor Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim.

The panel sat in the 17-day inquiry into the 14-minute video clip which was released by Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, purportedly showing Lingam brokering on the appointments of judges on the telephone with former chief justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim.

The commissioners, in their report which was released to the public, found the video clip to be authentic and also recommended that appropriate course of action be taken against Lingam, tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan, Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and two former chief justices Ahmad Fairuz and Tun Mohd Eusoff Chin for misconduct.

The commission found that there was sufficient evidence to investigate the six men on offences under the Sedition Act, Official Secrets Act and the Penal Code, and the Legal Profession Act 1976.

Except for Dr Mahathir, the other five men have filed applications seeking leave for a judicial review of the inquiry findings.

In the proceedings Wednesday, Lingam cited 12 grounds on why the court should grant leave for review of the inquiry's decision.

Among the grounds included that the commission's report was tainted with bias, erroneous and perverse because its findings were not supported by evidence and also did not give adequate consideration to relevant matters.

Lingam further said the panel had committed errors of law in its decision and in its decision-making process, as well as exceeded its jurisdiction because it only considered the first part of the video clip whilst refusing to admit the second and third part of the clip allegedly claimed by Anwar to be a continuation of the other parts of the video clip.

He submitted that the commission's decision to disallow two of his (Lingam) foreign experts to testify on the authenticity of the tape also constituted an act of grave unfairness and injustice against him because those experts were able to give authoritative evidence that the video clip was not authentic.

Lingam said the copy of the video tape analysed to determine its authenticity was not the original copy of the recordings of the events depicted in the video clip but was downloaded from Anwar's website.

He also contended that the commission's findings that he had committed criminal misbehaviour, was a grave attack on his reputation and that he had a fundamental right under Article 5 (1) of the Federal Constitution to safeguard his reputation.

Lingam also said the commission went on a frolic of its own when it made recommendations on the appointments and promotions of judges and on judicial reforms, whereas under the terms of reference, the commission only had the power to recommend appropriate action to be taken against individuals found to have misbehaved.

Hearing before Justice Datuk Abdul Kadir Musa continues on Sept 4.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
  • 2012 Bar Council Subscription
    Click the link above to download Circular 072/2012 pertaining to the 2012 Bar Council subscription, including the payment guide and a set of Frequently-Asked-Questions.
  • 2012 Sijil Annual Application Form
    Click the link above to download the 2012 Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate Application Forms.
  • Having difficulty in finding a lawyer?
    Need to find a lawyer to represent you? Just click on the link for the law firms' advertisements.
  • 2012 Hotel Corporate Rates
    Attending seminars? Going for a holiday? Click on the link above to check out the list of hotel corporate rates for Members of the Bar, which is updated regularly.
  • Bar Council Bookshop
    Read MORE … but pay LE$$! Members enjoy a 20% discount on LexisNexis publications at the Bar Council Bookshop. Click on the link above for the list of available titles.
International Malaysia Law Conference (26 to 28 Sept 2012)
Hurry up! The countdown continues and the current promotion rate ends 30 June 2012. Don't miss what is going to be the best conference in the region! On top of that, if you sign up with 5 or more people from the same organisation, we will give you a 10% group discount. Click on the link above to register.
Your Login


We have 210 guests and 3 members online

Malaysian Bar blasts police violence

Bar council: Police brutality worst in Bersih 3.0



show last 4hrs - 24hrs
April 2012 May 2012 June 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 18 1 2 3 4 5
Week 19 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Week 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Week 22 27 28 29 30 31
Google