News
Bar News/Berita Badan Peguam
Early arrest surprises Bar Council chairman | Early arrest surprises Bar Council chairman |
|
|
|
| Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:44am | |
|
• CID chief explains why Anwar was arrested
earlier Its chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan said: “We are particularly surprised
(about the early arrest) as he had been given until 2pm to show up at the
police headquarters.” CID chief explains why Anwar was arrested earlier Comments (5)
![]() written by Tong Kuan Ling, July 17, 2008
I thought the police had inevitably told the public that they would follow the procedures? - correct me if I'm wrong. written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, July 17, 2008
Well, believe it or not, Anwar has been freed on police bail, according to a malaysiakini report. written by Subasini Muniandy, July 17, 2008
The past has shown us time and time again that the Malaysian government thinks that the general public is so naive and/or gullible that we believe every piece of info that they spew our way. I think March 8 has proven otherwise and the powers that be should seriously re-think about using the Malaysian police as their personal ‘boys’ when the police are there to protect and serve the public and NOT to help the powers that be, achieve their personal agendas. The unwarranted road blocks on Monday being one of the matters on point. written by Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul Gafoor, July 18, 2008
The Anwar Ibrahim’s arrest episode reflects the hallmark of the efficiency of the PDRM, demonstrating how swiftly the police can swing into action in arresting a crime suspect, with 15 patrol cars (despite increase in petrol price) and balaclava include, albeit the offence is rather minor compared to other arrestable offences. Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




•







“He was arrested as we had reason to believe that he was not going to show up at the KL police headquarters.” What a powerful argument. There is no need to even say what the reason might be. It is comfort enough for us ordinary citizens that someone said he had a reason.
The same way another person might be detained under ISA because someone "has a reason to believe that he is a terrorist, or at least going to become one".
But the current use of this impeccable logic seems unduly restricted. It could benefit the nation much more if its use is expanded. For example, a Minister could be imprisoned if someone "has reason to believe he is corrupt", or, better still, if someone "has reason to believe that, though he is not yet corrupt, he is going to become corrupt". Spare us the details, for we ordinary citizens are too busy making ends meet to want to know. It is enough if someone has a reason.
Only then may we hope to become a nation of strong faith.
Yeo Yang Poh
P/S: Only postings supporting and praising this posting should be published. No posting questioning or arguing against the above should be sent to the webmaster, and, if sent, should be disregarded. I have reason to believe that I am absolutely right.